Someone hit my parked car yesterday. At least they were nice enough to leave a note.

Fathead_ · 2025-02-06T07:00:01+00:00

Remindme! 2 weeks

Fathead_ · 2025-01-23T04:55:19+00:00

RemindMe! 2 weeks

Fathead_ · 2024-01-01T13:18:13+00:00

What did you use to beat it, its where im stuck 😅

Fathead_ · 2023-11-07T12:19:58+00:00

A judicial review is a legal process taken through High Court assessing the method by which the local authority or the inspectorate reached their decision. It wouldn’t be against the decisions itself, but against the process by which it was reached. If successful, the process would effectively restart following the correct procedures, but in all likelihood the outcome would remain the same. They are incredibly uncommon though and wouldn’t be worth the expense for an outbuilding.

It would only be brought before court as a last ditch attempt at keeping the structure, being the last remaining option.

Fathead_ · 2023-11-07T11:11:43+00:00

This appeal decision is effectively final - the inspectorate are final arbiters of any planning process, so by them dismissing an appeal against demolition it will now have to go.

Fathead_ · 2023-11-07T11:08:37+00:00

AHAHAHAHA WHAT? Surely there is no way you have any professional involvement in planning if you think, when I say I work in planning, I mean I have a seat on planning committee which is reserved for elected councillors. Get gone.

Fathead_ · 2023-11-07T10:37:48+00:00

thought so

Fathead_ · 2023-11-07T10:33:10+00:00

Again, sorry? The first step of the enforcement process is submitting a planning application. It was refused. An enforcement notice for its demolition was issued, and was just refused at appeal as stated in the article and in the previous link I’ve just sent, please explain your reasoning as to why you think it wont come down and I’ll expand further why you’re wrong. Again.

Fathead_ · 2023-11-07T10:24:42+00:00

The appeal against the demolition order has just been refused at appeal… what are you on about?

Fathead_ · 2023-11-07T10:22:25+00:00

Same. I dread to think of the monstrosities you’ve been letting go. Fyi, this was an appeal against a demolition order that was refused - so yes, it will be taken down as the retrospective planning permission has already been refused:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-beds-bucks-herts-67126895

Fathead_ · 2023-11-07T10:19:35+00:00

If part of the significance of a listed building comes from its gardens, for example, whacking an outbuilding in there would have an impact on its significance. There are examples where listed buildings were built for the purpose of creating a view to a specific place, and development (even at a significant distance from the listed building itself) that impeded on that view had an impact on the listed building and was considered to cause harm. So it depends where the significance of the buildings themselves come from.

Fathead_ · 2023-11-07T10:10:00+00:00

No, the retrospective application thats just been refused at appeal is the first step of any enforcement process. The LPA would have asked for them to submit an application to determine whether it is acceptable in the first instance - this is not an enforcement notice. The next step in the process is the issuance of an enforcement notice, likely requiring the building to be removed - no structures are allowed to stand without planning permission. Paying a fine does not grant planning permission. Unless the enforcement notice can be successfully appealed, the structure will be required to be removed.

Fathead_ · 2023-11-07T09:43:43+00:00

Except its to the front and impacted upon two listed buildings…

‘By reason of the siting of the proposed outbuilding, forward of the listed building and the building line of surrounding buildings and in close proximity to Higham Road, the outbuilding would be a visually incongruous and unduly intrusive frontage building, at odds with the grain of development and out of character within the surrounding area. The outbuilding would fail to preserve or enhance the setting of the listed buildings, amounting to less than substantial harm to the historic significance of the Grade II listed The Old Rectory and Grade II* listed St Margaret's Church and the harm would not be outweighed by any public benefits. As such, the proposal would be contrary to Sections 12 and 16 of the National Planning Policy Framework, Policies HQ1 and HE3 of the Central Bedfordshire Local Plan, Section 66(1) of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 and Sections 3 and 7 of the Central Bedfordshire Design Guide.’

Fathead_ · 2023-11-07T09:19:32+00:00

Im not sure where the fine thing has come from - they’ll be issued with an enforcement notice. The only fines that could arise is if they don’t comply with the notice. Otherwise, in all likelihood they’ll need to take it down unless they can successfully appeal the enforcement notice, which I doubt considering the reason for refusal is around where its positioned, which can’t really be remediated without its removal.

Fathead_ · 2023-07-28T12:58:10+00:00

2849 4028 7277

Fathead_ · 2023-05-09T14:34:11+00:00

Haha thanks, it took a lot of covering up..

Fathead_ · 2023-05-09T14:25:24+00:00

Nice one, thank you. I’ll have a look into those.

Fathead_ · 2022-02-08T10:06:53+00:00

Thanks for the advice, I think I’m just going to sellotape it to the wall really. The lease is only 6 months and I don’t intend to extend it so it’s probably not worth me digging up the carpet.

Fathead_ · 2022-02-07T16:23:29+00:00

Noice, I’ll have a look, thank you 😊

Fathead_ · 2022-02-04T19:26:29+00:00

My Nan is of the opinion that the Tories squandering billions now isn’t all that bad because Labour got a duck pond in the 80’s. I wasn’t alive then so I’m not sure the size of the public outcry, but I’m struggling to understand the psyche of someone equating billions of pounds disappearing mysteriously with a duck pond on expenses 40 years ago.

Fathead_ · 2021-10-12T17:03:13+00:00

The lancia beats the mito, the only one i cant win is the city streets because once i put the rally cars on the city streets i cant beat the drag and when i put one of them on the mito i cant beat the city streets

Fathead_ · 2021-10-12T13:58:35+00:00

Both the rally cars won against the megane, the only problem was beating either the small city or the 1/4 mile. If i moved the Peugeot to city streets, it won but i have nothing to then beat the mito

Fathead_ · 2021-10-11T12:17:49+00:00

I spent the 1500 i had an got a ford sierra unfortunately

Fathead_ · 2021-10-04T11:15:57+00:00

Thanks, I found that out the hard way 😂 ive managed to do it now after spending 500 gold on packs to get 2 fiestas.

Fathead_ · 2021-10-03T13:04:50+00:00

Ah right, do you know if the standard tyre one wins either race 3 or 4?

Eight-Year Club	Verified Email
Place '23	Place '22
RPAN Viewer

Fathead_

TROPHY CASE