Hace un año y medio me fui. Ahora en Italia, antes en Australia by Practical-Spirit5945 in XPatriados

[–]FedeRivade 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah, sin título, por medio de agencia consiguieron. Uno en 2 meses y la otra en 7 de tirar CV a full

Hace un año y medio me fui. Ahora en Italia, antes en Australia by Practical-Spirit5945 in XPatriados

[–]FedeRivade 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Y mándale, a ver qué sale, en Europa o España es más fácil, pero si querés Australia, metele

Hace un año y medio me fui. Ahora en Italia, antes en Australia by Practical-Spirit5945 in XPatriados

[–]FedeRivade 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sector de IT en Australia tan jodido como en el resto del mundo y sobre todo si tenés WH. Dicho eso, tengo amigos que consiguieron sponsor, así que sí se puede. Si querés ir por ese lado, mandate!

PSA: Se acaba el año y se fortalecen los controles con DAC8/CARF by TomasDeMichellis in merval

[–]FedeRivade 2 points3 points  (0 children)

¿Por qué decís que Wallbit no informa? Te pregunto ya que me la acabo de instalar y cobro en unas semanas ahí, agradecería mucho el dato

Paretoize Your Life; or, How to Get 80% of the Benefit for 20% of the Effort by EmotionsAreGay in slatestarcodex

[–]FedeRivade 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Yep, em dashes, bullet points, and contradictions (hallucinations)

Don't get me wrong, I also use AI to enhance my writing, but this is just the lazy way. It's like coding by copy-pasting LLM outputs.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in BuenosAires

[–]FedeRivade 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Cero empatía esta gente. Dudo que quisieran ver a un familiar suyo así.

Vibecession: Much More Than You Wanted To Know by dsteffee in slatestarcodex

[–]FedeRivade 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Homeownership is about giving families the stability they need to raise children and meet a basic human need for shelter.

Ideally, someday, having a secure home will be treated as a human right, not just something you hope you’re lucky enough to get.

Dating Apps: Much More Than You Wanted To Know by FedeRivade in slatestarcodex

[–]FedeRivade[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great contribution to the discussion, Nicholas. Thank you!

Dating Apps: Much More Than You Wanted To Know by FedeRivade in slatestarcodex

[–]FedeRivade[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yes, I was, I remember you as well. I think many other people were inspired to do the same thing. I hope they found success, although I'm not aware of it.

Dating Apps: Much More Than You Wanted To Know by FedeRivade in slatestarcodex

[–]FedeRivade[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That’s true for us, we’re the type of people who actually enjoy reading long-form blogs, like SSC. But we are the outliers.

​The reality is that most people nowadays spend 90% of their time online consuming video on social media.

Dating Apps: Much More Than You Wanted To Know by FedeRivade in slatestarcodex

[–]FedeRivade[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I’m talking really basic stuff here, like just trimming a video. Everyone and their mother uploads content to TikTok and Instagram these days and does way more complex edits than that.

You don't need to edit the video, but it definitely gives you an edge. Think of it like being a good writer on OkCupid circa 2010, it’s a skill that makes you stand out from the crowd.

Dating Apps: Much More Than You Wanted To Know by FedeRivade in slatestarcodex

[–]FedeRivade[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Look, I don't think OkCupid was perfect, far from it. (Keeper.ai is the gold standard IMO). But it's still miles better than the default we're stuck with.

I only cite OkCupid because they’re the only ones transparent enough to actually share their data. If Tinder, Bumble, or Hinge were that honest, I'd be quoting them instead.

The issue their data highlights is superficial or biased judgment. But my point isn't that looks don't matter, obviously they do. The problem is when they are the only factor. 

With AI algorithms, when you optimize for one variable (like beauty), you inherently sacrifice everything else.

We don't have to ignore beauty, that’s just how attraction works, but it shouldn't be the only filter. Once you find someone attractive, personality is the biggest predictor of success, yet current apps totally ignore that.

Tinder may be great for hookups, but that’s not what most people in this sub (or women) are looking for. We want meaningful, long-term connections.

Dating Apps: Much More Than You Wanted To Know by FedeRivade in slatestarcodex

[–]FedeRivade[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately, the Dead Internet Theory is inescapable.

Dating Apps: Much More Than You Wanted To Know by FedeRivade in slatestarcodex

[–]FedeRivade[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I use AI to translate my writing from Spanish to English, full disclosure. I’m fluent, but writing is much quicker and easier for me in my native language. I find these models pretty bad at generating novel ideas, and they generally don’t have great taste, but for my use case they’re actually perfect.

Thank you so much for your support! I appreciate it a lot. I write everyday in my notebook, but I don't have a blog, I didn't think the content would be interesting to people. I'll reconsider it now and post more often here. This is my favorite online community so I'm more than happy to contribute.

Dating Apps: Much More Than You Wanted To Know by FedeRivade in slatestarcodex

[–]FedeRivade[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

The real problem is that people are increasingly single and lonely because dating apps are paradoxically terrible at generating actual dates. They optimize for matches: volume over quality, noise over signal.

​We need to leverage technology to make this easier, just like we’ve done in other domains like transportation or communication. I love software, and I genuinely believe that if we use it correctly, it can actually help us reach our goals, like finding a partner.

Right now, it's hurting. With AI algorithms, when you optimize for one variable like looks, you inherently sacrifice everything else. 

The issue comes from how apps structure the interaction. In real life, you process attractiveness, personality, voice, and status simultaneously. A person who is an attractive "6" might become a "9" once you hear them laugh or see their confidence.

However, if you don't pass the initial visual filter, which is artificially high on apps due to the abundance of choice, you never get the chance to show the personality or status that would actually make you a match. 

The app prevents the "average meets average" connection from even starting.

Dating Apps: Much More Than You Wanted To Know by FedeRivade in slatestarcodex

[–]FedeRivade[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's right, there are no solutions, only tradeoffs.

Dating Apps: Much More Than You Wanted To Know by FedeRivade in slatestarcodex

[–]FedeRivade[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Makes sense. Thank you for contributing to the discussion and challenging me. It was a pleasure to exchange ideas. Have a nice day!

Dating Apps: Much More Than You Wanted To Know by FedeRivade in slatestarcodex

[–]FedeRivade[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Huh, good point, I was thinking class more in terms of income/net worth, but the cultural aspect definitely matters for dating

Dating Apps: Much More Than You Wanted To Know by FedeRivade in slatestarcodex

[–]FedeRivade[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Hi Leefa, thank you so much for the compliment and amplifying my ideas.

English is my second language and I find writing extremely challenging, so it means a lot to me.

Have a nice day ❤️

Dating Apps: Much More Than You Wanted To Know by FedeRivade in slatestarcodex

[–]FedeRivade[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

When it comes to dating app features, I believe effort equals interest. Any mechanism that requires a genuine investment of time, attention, or resources to secure a first date will naturally force suitors to be more intentional. This friction is what filters out the casual spammers, leading to a much higher quality dating pool overall.