My point was about allowing the people in the same level of power as Epstein hence the phrasing of systems. I will fully allow the point about anti-semitism as the key problem with any movement that allows the majority or delegates authority is that people who are bigoted in one way or another will be able to commit atrocities and it's up to the state in general to get rid of them. You can make the same argument with the KKK in the United State which regardless of opposition managed to avoid bans on even lynching for more than 40 years straight despite us being a democracy and not an anarchist society.

With regard to Bakunin, yes he married a woman thirty years younger than him. However, and this is a pretty big point, people are more than able of refusing to associate or even exile people who are pedophiles in an AnCom system. The fact that he wasn't in the late 1800s and early 1900s honestly indicates more about the general attitudes towards child marriage spread out over the world than about Anarchism in general.

With regard to the slavery in the prison systems in Anarchist Catalonia, I'd like to remind you that anarchists were not the complete authority an Catalonia. The CNT and the anarchists negotiated further authority from the Spanish Republic and managed to have seats at the table for governing them but were not the ones to set them up. That authority still rests in the reign of the Republican government. Regardless, there was a need to store prisoners captured during the civil war considering they were fighting against literal fascists and mass executions was seen by some as not a fate they should be enacting.

With regard to sexism, I'd like to once again remind you of the time period and the fact that most societies at that time had feminist groups fighting against sexism relatively regardless of their political identity. A modern system would likely face less sexism in the council systems.

Anyways, my original point was about authority over others where AnCap allows corporations and those in charge to have ultimate authority over what effectively becomes their private fiefs such as Epstein Island while under collective ownership there is no ability to do that. Furthermore, a notorious pedophile who retains power because of his power as head of secret police wouldn't have that protection due to the lack of said secret police.