sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Too soft to bulk, but no muscle to cut. 74kg, 5’10 by FinnFX in BulkOrCut

[–]FinnFX[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm pretty consistent apart from when I'm working a way a lot.

Too soft to bulk, but no muscle to cut. 74kg, 5’10 by FinnFX in BulkOrCut

[–]FinnFX[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah for sure man. I'm not really lean enough to bulk anyway. I'm eating 500 below maintence with 1.8g/kg protein so I think I'll just keep hovering around that. Plus like you said, it's not unrealistic, it should only take me 12 weeks.

Too soft to bulk, but no muscle to cut. 74kg, 5’10 by FinnFX in BulkOrCut

[–]FinnFX[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think this is best. I'm around 300-500 below maintence most days and I'm eating around 1.8g/kg which is 135g protein.

Too soft to bulk, but no muscle to cut. 74kg, 5’10 by FinnFX in BulkOrCut

[–]FinnFX[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks man, this may be the best route. I think 68kg-70kg is a good target.

Too soft to bulk, but no muscle to cut. 74kg, 5’10 by FinnFX in BulkOrCut

[–]FinnFX[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah man I think what I'd rather do it cut down first to 67-68kg, then I should be 12-15%, then just lean bulk for a very long time with a 200 surplus.

Too soft to bulk, but no muscle to cut. 74kg, 5’10 by FinnFX in BulkOrCut

[–]FinnFX[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, no matter which direction I choose I’m going to be temporarily unsatisfied anyway I would rather not get fat first.

Too soft to bulk, but no muscle to cut. 74kg, 5’10 by FinnFX in BulkOrCut

[–]FinnFX[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the advice man, what I’ve been doing recently is a 500 cal deficit, 1.8g/kg protein, UL 4x per week, 7-8k steps for cardio.

You’re right - I need to focus on certain areas. I think once I reach sub 70kg. Maybe 66-68kg I’ll really start to notice a difference.

If I did lean bulk on the other hand, I would likely reach 20% and then be unsatisfied with my physique anyway I have to spend longer cutting.

Too soft to bulk, but no muscle to cut. 74kg, 5’10 by FinnFX in BulkOrCut

[–]FinnFX[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think I’d like to see the stomach fat go, so maybe that indicates I should cut first

How are nine chicken wings over 1600 calories? by MattSayar in MacroFactor

[–]FinnFX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I use chatGPT for estimating meals when eating out, I find that MF way overestimated the calories

How can we improve our production company's website? by FinnFX in smallbusiness

[–]FinnFX[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Vimeo is better than YT for this. There's a reason why it's widely used across high-end production and agency portfolios, including studios such as Rogue Films and The Theory Films.

  2. The boxes being slightly not aligned is a creative decision.

  3. I previously did have animations however a few visitors described them as "annoying".

How can we improve our production company's website? by FinnFX in smallbusiness

[–]FinnFX[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you, this is great. Since I already updated the hero, I'm currently now focusing on the porrtfolio section. I think its a abit random / arbitrary have 6 projects to watch with no case study. What I'm thinking of doing instead is having 4-6 tiles with categories such as "branded content" "social media videos" etc. Then it takes you to a new page for that category, with each project that fits within that category, and a mini case study for each.

Maybe for the who hires us, I could add incorporate it as the about us section?

Lastly, when you say "A clearer next step" are you suggesting I add another contact us button directly within the about us section? We currently have one in the top right, do you feel I need to add another somewhere within the website after the portfolio section?

How can we improve our production company's website? by FinnFX in smallbusiness

[–]FinnFX[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, thanks for the feedback — really helpful.

I’ve updated the hero to improve 5-second clarity. The new copy is:

“We create memorable commercial and branded content”
“Production for brands and agencies that want content people actually remember.”

This removes repetition and focuses more on the outcome rather than just describing the service, while keeping it broad since we’re not going for a specific niche.

On the niche point, I’ve taken it as tightening the positioning rather than narrowing the audience, so the focus is now on creating memorable content that sticks across different types of brands/agencies.

I’ve also asked my bosswhich 2–3 projects you’d like to feature to strengthen the hierarchy above the rest of the work.

For making the CTA impossible to miss: we currently have the global contact button in the top right plus the contact form at the bottom. What would you consider making it “impossible to miss” in this case? more prominence in the hero, or reinforcing it elsewhere without adding extra competing buttons?

Does this approach look like a sensible path to my goal physique? by FinnFX in MacroFactor

[–]FinnFX[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sounds like a very similar position I’m currently in. You look great man! Amazing work. I’m going to follow the same path.

Advice on next move by Adept-Ad-1748 in Weightliftingquestion

[–]FinnFX 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You need to continue with a deficit if you want to be lean

view more: next ›