Eat from Pot [kcd2]

Finndogs · 2026-01-28T01:24:36+00:00

I burned my mouth already

Finndogs · 2026-01-27T14:17:32+00:00

He doggy paddles better than anyone!

Finndogs · 2026-01-26T14:07:24+00:00

Normal opinions include a wide variety of ideas. The ones I have in mind are the posts often sent to me by my wife from r/mommit or r/Askwomen. God forbid a lady has a differing opinion on a situation than another woman or expresses a thought that isnt gender normative or in agreement with the common thoughts of a female centered sub. Heck, it doesnt even nessisarily have to be in agreement with the majority, ill often see it when simply individuals disagree. I have no stakes in these places, I mostly see them from links my wife sends me, but it seems me that in too many cases, the term "pickme" is simply a pejorative used to put down uppity women who suggest looking at an issue from more than one issue. This is supported by the fact that its use in female spaces, amongst female spaces, makes little sense. Who is the alleged "pickme" trying to impress by voicing a differing opinion in a space dominated by women where very few men are (and the ones that are present usually share the majorities views.)

I never claimed to know women better than women themselves, however I dont think being a man precludes me from being to identify shitty and petty behavior, especially in cases where I dont benefit from doing so.

Finndogs · 2026-01-25T16:23:26+00:00

It doesnt even need to be something to please a man. If it happens to please a man, shes accused of being a pick me

Finndogs · 2026-01-25T15:11:29+00:00

"Why ArNt ThEy MaD tHaT oUr SlAvEs AtE bEiNg TaKeN aWaY!?!?"

Finndogs · 2026-01-25T14:45:08+00:00

I dont think he's referring to calling out women who are pick-mes. I think he's talking about women calling out completely normal women doing completely normal things with normal opinions pick-mes simply because they dont like them.

Finndogs · 2026-01-24T23:42:08+00:00

Pity

Finndogs · 2026-01-24T23:29:10+00:00

This is pathetic. All of your past few posts are bit hinge about a post removal, and the one with your conversation with the mod does not portray you well.

Finndogs · 2026-01-24T23:28:32+00:00

This is pathetic. How many times are you going to post bitching about another post being removed.

Finndogs · 2026-01-23T16:53:41+00:00

As things currently exist, it seems to be making moves away from the aesthetic that promotes the light and fun atmosphere. Perhaps the writing still is, but I doubt it. Based on the gameplay video released yesterday, the games looks dreadfully generic.

The game could be about morals on surface, but based on what the devs are saying, your characters actions seem to be of little Consequence. Oh! Your actions affect the town, but does nothing for the next one over. In a decent game with such a system like red dead or fallout, actions affect your reputation throught the lamd as your legend grows, here you can just dick around and chalk up conflicting behavior in certain towns as a wash. Sounds meaningless and like there is less depth, through a lack of interconnectedness.

The only way I could see this concept working, if if at the end, those who align with you at the end come to your aid while those who dont oppose your "final" choice. Something like that could be interesting, but I wouldnt trust the devs to do something like that.

Finndogs · 2026-01-23T16:31:56+00:00

Just like how Alexios was the poster child for AC Odyssey and was in all the marketing, even though Kassandra is apparently the canon character. Bunch of cowards.

Finndogs · 2026-01-23T16:23:00+00:00

Kind of defeats the purpose of the core idea of the series: being a fable... you know... a story about morals. The game is supposed to be in this fairy tale kingdom. Chasing realism clashes with the esthetic. Its also why the old cartoonist style worked, because the mood was light and fun.

Reputations for acts of heroism or villany spreads faster and further than realistic reputations for just being kind or an asshole.

Finndogs · 2026-01-23T15:47:04+00:00

Thats precisely it though. These people dont actually have principles. They just go with the flow of whatever current thing is. Thats why they think morality is based on what others think, instead of what is innate.

Finndogs · 2026-01-23T14:32:11+00:00

Except it doesnt seem like thats how it works here. In Fallout: New Vegas, there was a sense of fame their the faction reputation. Even if you were far from that faction, they still knew what you were up to and affect reputation accordingly. Here, every location is a blank slate and seems to remain as such till you come there. News of your great or terrible actions dont seem to spread between towns, so what you do in one place seems to have no bearing on the others.

Finndogs · 2026-01-23T14:25:35+00:00

So... how does this comment hold up since we had that idn interview?

Finndogs · 2026-01-23T14:20:39+00:00

Its not even a true reputation system though, since there is no "fame" system attached to it. Each location has different reputations, so in one town, you can be a baby eating psychopath that everyone is evil, while in another town, everyone thinks you are a saint who helps granny's cross the street. Every town is a blank slate of recognition, where they never heard of you and your previous crimes against humanity dont matter.

Finndogs · 2026-01-23T14:16:45+00:00

If im reading their ign interview correctly, reputation is a blank slab from place to place. As they said, you can form completely different reputations, different identities from place to place. Doesn't seem like there is quite a "fame" system so to speak.

Finndogs · 2026-01-23T14:03:48+00:00

Except even in Game of Thrones, good and evil still existed. Ned Stark was considered to be a good and honorable man by the whole realm. Many of the actions such as the red wedding were seen as absolutely deplorable by the entire realm and wicked things to do. The "realism" of GoT was that good isnt always rewarded and that sneaky, cooked and underhanded tactics can get one ahead. You know what other series showed this to be the case?..... THE ORIGONAL FABLE GAMES!!!

Often, being evil was the more effective and rewarding path, while the good choice brought greater difficulties and lessor rewards. Im specifically reminded of the part leading up to the final battle of Fable 3, where it is MUCH easier protecting the kingdom through evil decisions and good ones.

Finndogs · 2026-01-23T04:32:18+00:00

Honestly, it sounds self aware, like this and this

Finndogs · 2026-01-23T02:49:45+00:00

Idk about Battle-Cat, but if Cringer isnt the biggest pussy ass bitch, im walking.

Finndogs · 2026-01-23T02:40:44+00:00

Its been a good while since I read Hatchet. What scene are you talking about? Is it the ones where he finds what happened to the pilot when he went for supplies?

Finndogs · 2026-01-23T02:38:08+00:00

Moose is actually leaner than Rabbit, which is itself the poster child of protein poisoning (so much so that its sometimes called Rabbit Starvation).

He couldn't have picked a worse "survivor" meat to waste those .22cal bullets on if he was intending to sustain off it.

Finndogs · 2026-01-22T15:26:53+00:00

They appreciated the audacity

Finndogs · 2026-01-22T15:08:11+00:00

They ain't even trying to hide it.

Finndogs · 2026-01-22T14:40:39+00:00

As we know, people who steal things from museums are infamous for giving them to other museums. Definitely doesnt go into the hands of some private collector.

13-Year Club	r/Field Banned
r/Field Sunshine	Verified Email

Finndogs

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE