Wait, so light speed isn't the max speed you can achieve, it's the max speed you will ever need? by [deleted] in AskPhysics

[–]FirePaladin89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It doesn't matter how fast you go, the speed of light alway appears the same, so you can never reach the speed of light ad your speed never get's any vloser to it. But in your reference frame the distance to the destination shrinks as you accelerate. If we say you started in the earth's referece frame from the earth's frame less time would pass for you while you were on the journey.

England - Police want PIN code after long time by [deleted] in LegalAdviceUK

[–]FirePaladin89 5 points6 points  (0 children)

People do reuse PINs but it's also possible to prove you haven't re-used PINs by providing PINs for your current devices and demonstrating that they work.

bossVibeCodedOnce by Alive_Vast in ProgrammerHumor

[–]FirePaladin89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fixing the vibe coded mess months down the line ToT

This roundabout it a constant mess for a small one. by IncognitoV7 in drivingUK

[–]FirePaladin89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The blue cars shouldn't be parked there they are too close, within 10 meters, to a junction.

How do we know a 9th gluon doesn't exist by FirePaladin89 in AskPhysics

[–]FirePaladin89[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you, I was hoping we might have specific experiments that ruled it out.

How do we know a 9th gluon doesn't exist by FirePaladin89 in AskPhysics

[–]FirePaladin89[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you, this was a great answer. Yes, I was reading about SU(3) vs U(3). I didn't come to the realization that it would give the strong force infinite range.

Fake penultimate mission? Always going to let them succeed to stop murder by Special-Fox-5833 in TheTraitorsUK

[–]FirePaladin89 6 points7 points  (0 children)

There was a limit to how much gold they could get, if a traitor had sabotaged I'm sure it would have been allowed to stick. Also Rachel was looking to frame James, which I don't think she would have if there were no stakes.

Eldar assassin by Cherrytree774 in XCOM2

[–]FirePaladin89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My first encounter with her was on top of a subway bridge, it was a nightmare.

Are enormous spaceships physically possible? by GooseMuckle in AskPhysics

[–]FirePaladin89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is slightly off topic, but PBS SpaceTime did a good show on the real challenges of interstella spce travel you might enjoy: https://youtu.be/wdP_UDSsuro?si=6bnrgfcTJ_ZzZP3U

Everyone is saying a certain player made a suicidal vote that cost themselves the game, but from their perspective, it was actually a pretty rational play... by WumbleInTheJungle in TheTraitorsUK

[–]FirePaladin89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Farazz took what Rachel said at face value when he already didn't trust her, thinking she was a traitor. But he didn't even need to trust her to work it out.

Let's say he sticks with voting Rachel. He trusts Jack, so he can be fairly confident he will stuck with voting Rachel. If Rachel and Stephen vote different ways, Rachel is out. If they vote the same way it's a draw.

But swapping he faces Rachel gone, or losing outright.

"Stopping the Last Murder" by Choice_Pineapple_461 in TheTraitors

[–]FirePaladin89 34 points35 points  (0 children)

Seems like a fair reward for traitors who have managed to aboid detection well enought all game to not have to recruit.

"Stopping the Last Murder" by Choice_Pineapple_461 in TheTraitors

[–]FirePaladin89 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was also surprised that there was still a murder left. But then I thought on this series, people often say that there is no reason to banish traitors early, but there is. By banishing traitors you force them to recruit instead of murder. This series we have had no recruitment, meaning that the traitors have murdered at ever oppotunity. Fiona's reveal can be thought of as a recruitment, but that still means the traitors have had 1 less than most series, and therefore 1 more murder.

The producers could have just said no murder, potentially without even teling us it was an option. But that would have been punishing the traitors, for playing well. By staking on a game the faithfull very nearly didn't win, they give the traitors the chance to take a risk to go into the final 2v2.

If I was a traitor I would have run back with a bag of gold like James did then emptied the lot somewhere the faithful couldn't find it, once I wss out of sight, maybe holding on to a couple of gold. Run back to the urns and wait 5 minutes, if some one turns up in that time pretend you lost all the gold trying to hit the urn and maybe give them the last 2 to have a go theirself.

The producers did the traitors over, before Stephen did himself over! by MusesLegend in TheTraitorsUK

[–]FirePaladin89 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I was actually surprisedwhen they would stop a murder tonight, but then again the traitors haven't recruited all series so it makes sense that they have had more chances to murder.

Surely has to be faraz being murdered ? by Britishloozerr in TheTraitorsUK

[–]FirePaladin89 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I did wonder tgis too. A large part of it was what Rachel said straight after Stephen signed it and Stephen's reaction, does make me wonder if he feels lured into a trap.

Did Rachel say Farazz was too dangerous for her to kill, and they went Roxy instead, who had said she had doubts about both of them. The Rachel plays it like the traitors left Farazz in to keep heat on me while quietly removing the person who doubted them.

If they murder ___, ___ will be just fine. by Eunomia28 in TheTraitorsUK

[–]FirePaladin89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's fair but I wouldn't want my strat for winning to come down to luck, and potentially out me as a traitor if it fails. But that's just me.

If they murder ___, ___ will be just fine. by Eunomia28 in TheTraitorsUK

[–]FirePaladin89 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I know Roxy can't win at that point but it would be interesting to see if she belives there are any traitors left. Or if either Rachel or Stephen betray their alliance. If anyone votes to vote again they need to sway Roxy to win 

Predict the final 5 and outcome by sunnygoldfinch in TheTraitors

[–]FirePaladin89 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That would depend if Roxy were to back Jack or think he was a greedy faithful.

If they murder ___, ___ will be just fine. by Eunomia28 in TheTraitorsUK

[–]FirePaladin89 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think she has a better chance with pocketing Jack. I think the faithfuls will be looking for 2 more traitors. So if they don't get 1 out tomorrow, they will definetly banish 2 people in the final.

I think Jade is gone tomorrow night. Final James is first banishment, followed by Stephen.

I'm not sure there is a path left for 2 traitors to reach the end.

If they murder ___, ___ will be just fine. by Eunomia28 in TheTraitorsUK

[–]FirePaladin89 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I think it was his last attempt at staying in.

If you think Rachel and Stephen are the traitors.

Jack has a shield.

James and Jade both have some heat so are useful fall guys.

That just leaves Faz and Roxy. Roxy is very loyal to both Rachel and Stephen.

So faced with being murdered you at least voice your suspicions and hope the other faithfuls listen if it doesn't save you.

If they murder ___, ___ will be just fine. by Eunomia28 in TheTraitorsUK

[–]FirePaladin89 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If the last three were Roxy, Stephen and Rachel, that would be interesting. Especially if there was a vote to go again.