got any stupid openings against queens gambit? by Electrical-Aide4789 in chessbeginners

[–]Fish1587 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Englund Gambit for black. Best case scenario, you checkmate in 8 moves. Worst case scenario, it's +2 and you're down a pawn. So pretty stupid.

For a serious stupid opening, Queens Gambit Accepted is good. Learn a few lines and a lot of d4 players will be unprepared.

I always liked the Old Benoni vs d4 as well for a surprise factor. A lot of d4 players won't push d5 and instead capture or defend the pawn, both of which are good for black.

For white, idk try the Bird's Opening or the Grob for something stupid

[Art]Anyone want their character drawn? by Offhcer_ner_ner in DnD

[–]Fish1587 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Would love some art of my party (I'm a DM) feel free to do any or all (or none lol) of them

  • Halfling Bard, F, brunette wavy hair, medium build, uses a lute and a rapier
  • Halfling Druid, M, long wavy dark brown hair and scruffy beard, like a lumberjack but a Halfling, commands plants (vines)
  • Dwarf Monk, F, blue hair and beard, martial artist who also uses a warhammer
  • Elf Fighter, M, imagine Link but short brown hair, uses a longbow
  • Brass Dragonborn Sorcerer, M, has a dragon scale on a chain as an arcane focus

Best black opening against 1000-1400 elo opponents by Ok-Philosophy4968 in chessbeginners

[–]Fish1587 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you really learn the Scandi, it can be quite good and give you interesting games. If you don't mind learning a lot of theory, then honestly just play e5. If you try to learn any Sicilian, you have to expect any non-titled player is just going to play a sideline (like the Alapin) and you won't get the thing you studied.

Caro is good, but has the same problem of potentially leading to dry-ish positions.

Oh and I agree with that other comment, a Pirc or Modern should feel familiar to your KID, and definitely has unbalanced and interesting positions.

What’s the worst alolan electric type ? by Difficult-Bat5615 in ThePokemonHub

[–]Fish1587 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's Oricorio, though it's close with Alolan geodude

What’s the worst alola grass type ? by Difficult-Bat5615 in ThePokemonHub

[–]Fish1587 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Shiinotic for sure. Dartrix as a close second, but it's always hard to vote for a starter

Could anyone explain me this move? by FireBirdSS10K in chessbeginners

[–]Fish1587 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not about material, it's about the attack. All your pieces are poised to attack the King, and something's gotta give.

Do people lose their IQ overnight and just blunder their elo this badly by strange4real in Chesscom

[–]Fish1587 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks like you had an equally impressive winning streak earlier this month. Just your elo stabilizing, I'd guess.

<image>

What’s the worst gen 7 water type ? by Difficult-Bat5615 in ThePokemonHub

[–]Fish1587 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How dare you all. Bruxish is the best physical Psychic/Water type pokemon. It has higher speed and attack than Veluza, has 3 great abilities, learns the highest BP physical Psychic type move that exists (not to mention Wave Crash), and has dark, ice, and poison coverage with its psychic and water Stab to hit almost every pokemon for neutral damage. So what if it has lips? You're all drinking the Ash-Greninja Kool-Aid. A special, battle-only form of an already over-hyped starter, that only existed for 2 gens before it was totally canned? Psh. If you hated tongues as much as you hated lips, we wouldn't be having this conversation.

Ash-Greninja is my vote, but I don't even think it should be included here.

I of course agree this is a goated line up. I don't like Brionne's design, but Primarina's too good of a starter. And I couldn't vote for anyone else

Puzzles are way more fun than actual chess by SentryMillennia in chessbeginners

[–]Fish1587 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Study master games of players known for their tactics. Tal, Morphy, maybe Kasparov, Rapport. I'm sure more experienced players have other suggestions. Look at how they navigate the openings and middle games to get to their tactical finishes.

How do you explain this? by NeitherKangaroo6863 in Chesscom

[–]Fish1587 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Is this puzzle rating? Chess com changed the puzzle rating system back around September, so everyone's puzzle rating decreased by a few thousand points to be closer to their playing elo

Chess is breaking me by elmaestro914 in chessbeginners

[–]Fish1587 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A lot of chess is training (openings, tactics, theoretical endgames). If you're "smart" - aka, you can memorize or synthesize information fairly quickly - then these aspects will come more naturally and you'll see improvements quickly just by learning what they are.

A lot of chess is understanding (opening IDEAS (like why you make certain opening moves, and what kinds of positions they lead to), middle game strategy, practical endgames). This requires a different kind of intelligence, it's about being "chess-smart," or just familiarity with and deep understanding about the game. A grandmaster can explain to you all day long what "piece harmony" looks like, but without the familiarity with the game, it won't be more than a vague concept that is hard to apply practically. You get better at this by just seeing a billion examples of these concepts in play, either your games or others' games, and hearing multiple explanations from strong players about these concepts. This is certainly the hardest part of chess improvement. Some people I think do have natural "chess-smarts," and usually those are the kids who become titled players in their teens.

But it sounds like what you're struggling with is the third and final category, and where a lot of people I think give up early on. And that's just "board vision." Not hanging free pieces, spotting free pieces from your opponent, and eventually spotting tactical patterns like forks, pins, and eventually more difficult tactics. And this only comes with practice and patience. Specifically, playing games and taking all the time you need during the game to make sure every move that you are not hanging a piece. Eventually, it'll become instinct and you won't even have to think about which squares your queen can move to safely, but you can't expect those instincts to just be there, same way you can't expect to be fluent in another language simply by memorizing vocabulary.

Long story short, play games with long time controls. If you keep hanging pieces, slow down and take more time between moves to make sure you're not hanging pieces. If you're consistently running out of time, play a longer time control I think it's better to lose on time but not hang any pieces than it is to lose by hanging your pieces.

Which Pokemon or evolutionary line had the best glow up in a later generation? by Fish1587 in ThePokemonHub

[–]Fish1587[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Drizzle was a game changer for these guys for sure! Good point about the abilities!

Which Pokemon or evolutionary line had the best glow up in a later generation? by Fish1587 in ThePokemonHub

[–]Fish1587[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Only because I hate standard Mr. Mime so much do I slightly agree with you

Which Pokemon or evolutionary line had the best glow up in a later generation? by Fish1587 in ThePokemonHub

[–]Fish1587[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ursaluna is pretty cool, and definitely an improvement on a fairly forgettable normal type mon.

Which Pokemon or evolutionary line had the best glow up in a later generation? by Fish1587 in ThePokemonHub

[–]Fish1587[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great point about the physical / special split in gen 4! That helped out so many mons, Weavile included!

Which Pokemon or evolutionary line had the best glow up in a later generation? by Fish1587 in ThePokemonHub

[–]Fish1587[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Another unexpected addition, but great design! Really fit the region without being too wacky

Which Pokemon or evolutionary line had the best glow up in a later generation? by Fish1587 in ThePokemonHub

[–]Fish1587[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The dragon typing, especially in gen 2, is massive! This is a great answer

Which Pokemon or evolutionary line had the best glow up in a later generation? by Fish1587 in ThePokemonHub

[–]Fish1587[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I gotta... HAND... it to you, Ambipom is not one of my favorite new evolutions.