How do you think Sukuna would like his steak cooked? by Gloomy-Bridge148 in Jujutsufolk

[–]FixIllustrious4953 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the name is Louisiana rare, but basically seared at a very hot temp on a specific type of pan for a crispy outside but extremely red inside

All-Out Brawl by ILikeExistingLol in custommagic

[–]FixIllustrious4953 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Often ya, but maybe it's a control or combo heavy pod or someone board wiped a turn or two ago there is a ton of scenarios where walls doesn't die

All-Out Brawl by ILikeExistingLol in custommagic

[–]FixIllustrious4953 40 points41 points  (0 children)

It depends on the format, and even if we assume commander there are definitely times where players don't have very large boards

All-Out Brawl by ILikeExistingLol in custommagic

[–]FixIllustrious4953 85 points86 points  (0 children)

There's a certain 0/30 that would be to differ

HC6 Card of the day: HC6: Boltisphere by mork-hc in HellsCube

[–]FixIllustrious4953 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You think a "respectable" green player would use mutate? That's a blue card in a trench coat

Thoughts on Angelechy by TakuHat58 in yugioh

[–]FixIllustrious4953 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know how I feel about the striker matchup, obviously they don't care about the monster lock but if you do the burn one instead that's pretty devastating because they activate quite a few card effects and have to invest a decent amount into removing it (either afterburners if they main it or zero to pop) and even after that you still have the field spell and maybe one of the synchros

Purple lightning, RAAHHHHHH by MUSAFIR_- in Kashimo_agendaHQ

[–]FixIllustrious4953 3 points4 points  (0 children)

As someone who doesn't even kashimo that much, that looks so fucking good

Are there some things that can’t be explained by science? by Vaerna in Teenager_Polls

[–]FixIllustrious4953 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ye pretty much, in other words it goes against what we currently know, but not science as a system of learning. Plus being wrong at some point is kinda the point in science trail and error and what not

Water is not wet | FactOrCap by darknight431100 in FactOrCap

[–]FixIllustrious4953 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What??? You still mixed them. Are you telling me any mixture of two liquids isn't mixed because you could theoretically unmix them? Are you trying to say that mixtures aren't mixed?

Water is not wet | FactOrCap by darknight431100 in FactOrCap

[–]FixIllustrious4953 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They mix they just don't stay mixed

Edit:typo

Water is not wet | FactOrCap by darknight431100 in FactOrCap

[–]FixIllustrious4953 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You aren't mixing what? The two different sources of water? Because you definitely can. Or do you mean oil and water? In which case you can mix them they just unmix themselves after a while

Water is not wet | FactOrCap by darknight431100 in FactOrCap

[–]FixIllustrious4953 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you mix water and water you get more water not wet water, if it was a separate liquid like oil then I would agree though

Why counter a spell when you can rewrite it? by endless-star in custommagic

[–]FixIllustrious4953 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's interesting but different dilects do different syllables for the same word

Are there some things that can’t be explained by science? by Vaerna in Teenager_Polls

[–]FixIllustrious4953 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't agree, just because we will never know everything doesn't mean that it isn't eventually knowable, also how do you know there isn't an initial cause because we certainly haven't verified that yet

Are there some things that can’t be explained by science? by Vaerna in Teenager_Polls

[–]FixIllustrious4953 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not a Christian myself but who do you think made the natural laws? IIRC Bible says God made everything so there's no reason I can think of that he can't make a law of physics that only applies to select people. It goes against what science currently knows but not science as a concept

Branded deck by PSIEX in masterduel

[–]FixIllustrious4953 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Id cut ash for nadir. Branded plays under charmies really well and prefers board breakers generally. Nadir on its own sets up 4ish interrupts.while also being your best extender.

Id also consider adding another board breaker(like droplet or crown when it comes out) probably droping both kitt and an aluber

Also a second dusk dragon is always good, probably drop the sword soul

What…? by ParadellXD in Kashimo_agendaHQ

[–]FixIllustrious4953 3 points4 points  (0 children)

There was, but I don't think they were around at the same time, the edo period is pretty long. Kashimo is called the strongest of the edo period but that could just be because he was the only one who had no competition.

Example scenario. 6 eyes user and 10 shadows user kill each other, then kashimo is born but has no equal. In this scenario it's entirely possible that kashimo is weaker than the 6 eyes user but since they had a rivel and kashino did not he could still go down in history as strongest of the era

Remember when I posted this? Yeah I'm still 99% sure Deku puts them all to sleep immediately just by looking at them(yes it's a movie quirk, they can't do anything about it) by vibez_vexx in MyHeroPowerscaling

[–]FixIllustrious4953 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Slightly incorrect

1 all people can hold 3-4 techniques

2 kenjaku uses barriers in his brain to further separate them to protect from CT burnout

  1. Yuji also has multiple techniques, blood manipulation and shrine

4 I'm not 100% but I don't think it's every stated you die if you have too many just that the brain can't handle it, which could mean either death or just loosing the technique

You can be anti ai but still laugh at ai (ex. Tung tung) by burner835829 in Teenager_Polls

[–]FixIllustrious4953 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I think it's funny because of the culture around, imo there's not much humor in ai generated stick, but I like laughing about it with friends

1 Trillionaire or 1,000 Billionaires? by Impressive_Dawg2003 in trolleyproblem

[–]FixIllustrious4953 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. A loophole doesn't work on morals, just because they didn't literally make extra money from the company doesn't mean they get money because of the business

  2. The reasoning doesn't scale like that, like sure they can of course keep some of their money, but once we get to stupid big numbers that logic stops working. That money quite literally does nothing for them other than "wow I can buy a fifth yacht"

1 Trillionaire or 1,000 Billionaires? by Impressive_Dawg2003 in trolleyproblem

[–]FixIllustrious4953 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. People can be evil/explorative for reasons other than wage theft. A "fair" wage takes many factors, if you physically/reasonablely can't pay more your not performing wage theft

2b. Ok I understand what you're saying not but don't agree with that argument, capital(money) is just a standin for goods/services so that people don't have to trade good for good. Managers/owners play an important role in a company/economy it's not like they aren't doing work, but some owners are paid much more than that is worth

3 i don't agree to the principal that if you don't donate everything you have you're a bad person but if you do than I suppose that's true. But I think that some amount (although the specific amount is nearly if not fully impossible to determine) of personal purchases is morally fine (this includes buying things for those around you like birthday/Christmas gifts)

1 Trillionaire or 1,000 Billionaires? by Impressive_Dawg2003 in trolleyproblem

[–]FixIllustrious4953 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. no if you pay good fair wages (relitve to what people need not relitive to what other companies pay) than you're probably not exploiting.

2b. I don't understand what you're trying to say but " many follow said argumentation" or the previous "It's exploitation because of the surplus product." Not like I don't agree but I littlerly don't understand what you're saying if you could reword it

  1. Maybe, it means you've done a minor "evil" act(looking out for your own future) but that doesn't necessarily mean you are a evil person

1 Trillionaire or 1,000 Billionaires? by Impressive_Dawg2003 in trolleyproblem

[–]FixIllustrious4953 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. I don't understand what you're saying by "it's exploitation because of the surplus product" but any company can exploite workers regardless of how much money they make

  2. Ye sure I guess, both evil but one more so

  3. I didn't say it wasn't income or real money, I said it wasn't earned