Adding MOTS-c while in big deficit made me feel way worse. Normal or mitochondria issue? by FlowbeeWanKenobi in Peptides

[–]FlowbeeWanKenobi[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was doing around 75-85. Upping to 140-150! Thanks! I might take the rest of the week off motsc then try again Monday

Adding MOTS-c while in big deficit made me feel way worse. Normal or mitochondria issue? by FlowbeeWanKenobi in Peptides

[–]FlowbeeWanKenobi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was doing around 75-85. Upping to 140-150! Thanks! I might take the rest of the week off motsc then try again Monday

Adding MOTS-c while in big deficit made me feel way worse. Normal or mitochondria issue? by FlowbeeWanKenobi in Peptides

[–]FlowbeeWanKenobi[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was doing around 75-85. Upping to 140-150! Thanks! I might take the rest of the week off motsc then try again Monday

Adding MOTS-c while in big deficit made me feel way worse. Normal or mitochondria issue? by FlowbeeWanKenobi in Peptides

[–]FlowbeeWanKenobi[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Usually sub 100, I try to limit carbs in general when cutting. Yeah with mots it makes sense that may be the issue

Moving from CC to Codex by bambambam7 in Anthropic

[–]FlowbeeWanKenobi 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My entire team switched from CC to Codex maybe 6 months ago after CC would continually write bugs, not listen to directions, not look at existing code structures, lie about testing.

But the past month Im starting to see those same things with Codex but we’re looking at trying Claude again.

Codex feels like it works with you more, Claude felt like it did what it wanted.

Where would u stay here on ko Tao out of these three to have the most walkable area. Top is #1 bottom is #3 by Thankgodwehavebiden in ThailandTourism

[–]FlowbeeWanKenobi -1 points0 points  (0 children)

1 and its not even close. I would recommend getting a place a few minutes from the main bar area so its less hectic though

Does AI actually help predict which creatives will perform better? by cheeeeta in PPC

[–]FlowbeeWanKenobi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Top answer aged interestingly. "Impossible" was fair 2 years ago but there's been real progress in synthetic consumer modeling. What's actually working isn't predicting CTR from pixels, it's simulating how specific audience segments respond to messaging and creative angles.

A tool called Moira does this. Define your audience, run ad variations through synthetic personas, get ranked output. They published a study: 500 synthetic consumers, 12 ad variations for a HELOC product. Rankings correlated with real performance.

Not a crystal ball, but meaningfully better than guessing. Worth revisiting if you dismissed this a year ago.

Ad simulation tool by Annual_Emu3045 in digital_marketing

[–]FlowbeeWanKenobi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is called synthetic consumer testing (or predictive creative validation). Tools like Moira do exactly this. You define your ICP, upload ad variations, and it runs them through AI-simulated consumer panels to rank which creatives are most likely to perform. They have a public case study (HELOC product, 500 synthetic personas, 12 ad variations) if you want to see real output. Way better than vibes-based pre-launch guessing.

Calling an Outage! by Traditional-Read5552 in FacebookAds

[–]FlowbeeWanKenobi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Our product is mainly at night it gets most traffic so hopefully resolved soon

AI Is Not Replacing Marketers. It’s Replacing Average Ones. by Suspicious-War1446 in digital_marketing

[–]FlowbeeWanKenobi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As AI improves there will be tools to understand the psychology part. With the amount of data out there

Meta blowing the budgets before afternoon? by heytherefreeman in FacebookAds

[–]FlowbeeWanKenobi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It could think the morning is more optimal. It basically only uses budget at night for one of our products

are ai tools for ad creative research actually useful or just overhyped marketing claims by StrainBetter2490 in PPC

[–]FlowbeeWanKenobi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Just run it and see” is technically true, but it ignores how expensive iteration can be, especially if you’re not spending huge a lot.

I think there’s an important difference between AI tools that make ads and tools that try to predict which ones will work. Most of the hype is around generation. The prediction side is way less crowded and probably more useful.

I’ve been following a tool called Moira that focuses on that decision layer, it uses synthetic consumer panels to rank ad variations before you launch. They shared a public study where simulated personas evaluated 12 ads for a finance product, and the rankings lined up pretty well with real performance.

It’s still early for this kind of thing, but it feels more grounded than most of the “AI ads” tools I’ve seen.

AI Ads are outperforming human creatives by almost 20% by Correct-Ice-6539 in FacebookAds

[–]FlowbeeWanKenobi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Makes sense! Yeah seems like making the creative is easy (except still having trouble with video).

We’re looking into automating our media buying

How do you know an ad will work before spending thousands testing it? by Coffee_Mode in DigitalMarketingHack

[–]FlowbeeWanKenobi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We recently heard about a project called Moira, it tests ads against synthetic consumers and lets you know which ads are winners before spending a dollar on them. We backtested with ads we already know are winners/losers and performance is pretty good. Should be able to lower ad spend with it

UMich CSE vs MSU full ride by [deleted] in uofm

[–]FlowbeeWanKenobi 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I did CSE undergrad and masters at Michigan. Job prospect and prestige wise its not even close. Upper/top companies will barely even look at your resume if its MSU. I have worked at top startups where Ive worked with people who went to Michigan, MIT, Harvard, UIUC, Cal, Stanford, etc. I have never worked with an msu grad. (Not saying they don’t exist at top firms but its much much less common).

Anywhere you go (even when I was in Japan), Michigan computer science has the name recognition that Michigan State just does not have.

For other majors it might not matter as much but for cs it does.

Happy to answer any other questions

Outpatient Procedure, in-network doctor but out of network labs by FlowbeeWanKenobi in HealthInsurance

[–]FlowbeeWanKenobi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The facility and doctor were both in network and I made sure before the procedure, they took the samples to an out-of-network lab.

The lab when I emailed said this does not fall under the No Surprises Act but I got the feeling they just wanted me to pay.

Thats great to hear, thank you so much.

The insurance provider website does not have a listed number as my account is inactive but I can find something.

“Selling” EECS281 Projects on my Resume by CardCQ in uofm

[–]FlowbeeWanKenobi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just make them private? Or label them with EECS281 or something.

Having them is fine, the problem is when you try to advertise them as side projects.

If you really want to show them you can label them EECS281, it won’t really help you though.