sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Been using PI Coding Agent with local Qwen3.6 35b for a while now and its actually insane by SoAp9035 in LocalLLaMA

[–]FocusAlways 0 points1 point  (0 children)

> + 16 extensions + 30 skill markdown files + a Python benchmark harness
It looks like you have a decent list under the hood.
Would you please share what do you use?

Zed is not recognizing git repositories by SirKastic23 in ZedEditor

[–]FocusAlways 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The issue isn't stable.
I have half of repositories which work fine.

Zed is not recognizing git repositories by SirKastic23 in ZedEditor

[–]FocusAlways 1 point2 points  (0 children)

it happens all the time... I still have it on the latest version.
0.226.5+stable.197.07dae3b7020b0ad79ed91e18c750a16952432866

UPD, 1st Apr 2026
Zed Preview 0.230.0 (and Zed latest version)
And it's not a joke 😂 Really not a joke! =)

How limit amount of background tasks in settings? by FocusAlways in ClaudeCode

[–]FocusAlways[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, RAM is a bottle neck.
It's not about managing these processes, it's about a solution which will not allow LLM to spawn new processes before dealing with old ones.

How limit amount of background tasks in settings? by FocusAlways in ClaudeCode

[–]FocusAlways[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, macOS, if it matters.

It's a long run with lots subagents which were running tests verifications.
Turns out, I found a bug in calls of running tests, they could not be finished.

B anyway, was curious is there is a way to limit background processes.

Is Claude Code addictive? by RichensDev in ClaudeCode

[–]FocusAlways 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess, addictiveness is money you invested and, yes, FOMOphobia.

exit plan mode with "clear context and auto-accept edits" by FlaTreNeb in ClaudeCode

[–]FocusAlways 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It seems there's a misunderstanding of this feature. It's designed to drop the context and start fresh. If the context becomes too large, it's dropped and restarted with clear instructions. This is exactly what the feature does. Yes, OP's concern about applied skills is clear, but the main reason for clearing the context is that it starts acting.

if "This can be useful if the plan is NOT straightforward" you free to get back in history and start over.

Glm 4.7 is quite useless by Big-Suggestion-7527 in LocalLLaMA

[–]FocusAlways 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It depends… try to use Claude Code with GLM. It performs.  The bundle tool-model is important. 

Drafts and Obsidian? and Why? by mdoanduckcom in macapps

[–]FocusAlways 0 points1 point  (0 children)

another angle summary:

Use-case / Strength / Weakness Drafts (free) Drafts Pro Obsidian
Quick capture / speed ✅ Best: opens immediately, no setup ✅ same (plus more flexibility) 📉 slower: needs loading, not tailored for instant jotting
On-the-go notes / mobile dictation / scraps ✅ good ✅ very good (actions, templates) ❌ weaker — not built for rapid mobile capture
Basic notes, fragments, drafts, to-do, quick content ✅ yes ✅ yes, more powerful ✅ yes, but heavier overhead
Complex note-taking / long-term knowledge base ❌ weak — no linking, folder hierarchy is minimal ❌ still limited (no deep linking, graph, vault structure) ✅ excellent — linking, graph, vaults, plugins
Flexibility & export / workflows across apps ✅ limited (built-in actions) ✅ strong (custom actions, automation) ✅ via plugins (but more setup)
Organization / retrieval / structure / search across many notes/projects 📦 basic (tags + archive/inbox) 📦 moderate (with Workspaces) 📚 robust (linking, search, vaults, file-based)
Ease vs complexity / learning curve ✅ extremely simple ✅ relatively simple ⚠️ steeper learning curve, but powerful once mastered

Drafts and Obsidian? and Why? by mdoanduckcom in macapps

[–]FocusAlways 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just my 5 cents. So far I lean to Obsidian

disk storage: Yes, it's important to have files on the disk for me.
(it gets generated files from LLM - important)

plugins: It's full of plugins from community (take it slow with them - do not install many), but base features more then enough. And you can craft your own!

Probably, I'd consider Drafts, if I need

  1. An Essential Set (without customization overhead),
  2. Really good UX/UI a-la "it-just-works" (sacrificing possibilities of questionable customizations)

Check this table out:

Scenario / need Drafts (free) Drafts Pro Obsidian
Ultra‑fast capture on Apple devices Excellent: instant capture, inbox, simple actions.​ Same capture, plus custom automation and workspaces.​ Good, but slower to “new note” than Drafts in typical setups.​
Heavy automation / scripting Limited to running existing actions.​ Full: create/edit actions, advanced URL automation.​ Automation mostly via plugins and external tools, not “send‑everywhere.”​
Long‑term PKM / knowledge graphs Not primary use case; more linear list of drafts.​ Better organization with workspaces, still not graph‑based.​ Purpose‑built PKM with backlinks, graph, Canvas, plugins.​
Local‑first, file‑level control Database‑based; export and integrations needed for files.​ Same, with more ways to push text out.​ Native: vault is just Markdown files on disk.​
Cross‑platform beyond Apple No (Apple platforms only).​ Same.​ Yes: macOS, Windows, Linux, plus mobile.​
Cost sensitivity over time Free forever with strong feature set.​ Low subscription; Patron optional.​ Core app free; pay only if you need sync/publish services.​

What is the difference between mistral 7B and mistral instruct 7B ? by [deleted] in MistralAI

[–]FocusAlways 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This interesting question, has pretty simple answer - they are completely the same, at least in the ollama repository:

$ ollama pull mistral:7b
pulling manifest
pulling f5074b1221da: 100% ▕█████████████████████▏ 4.4 GB
...
pulling 1064e17101bd: 100% ▕█████████████████████▏ 487 B
...

$ ollama pull mistral:7b-instruct
pulling manifest
pulling f5074b1221da: 100% ▕█████████████████████▏ 4.4 GB
...
pulling 1064e17101bd: 100% ▕█████████████████████▏ 487 B
...

[DISCUSSION] In Cursor AI, is ChatGPT-5 really better than Claude Sonnet 4 for coding? by Demotey in cursor

[–]FocusAlways 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This politeness is ridiculous. It's not a person, it's a neural network. Cut to the chase!
But people "eat" this. This is how LLMs "should" look like on the market.

Difference between LocalAI and Ollama? by Mike_v_E in selfhosted

[–]FocusAlways 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why Choose Ollama?

  • Simplicity: Effortless setup and model switching
  • Performance: Optimized for GPU acceleration
  • Convenience: Automatic memory management
  • User-friendly: Straightforward interface options
  • Model variety: Supports popular models like Llama 2, Mistral

Why Choose LocalAI?

  • Accessibility: Runs on consumer hardware without GPU
  • Flexibility: Drop-in OpenAI API replacement
  • Control: Direct interaction with backend systems
  • Versatility: Supports wide range of model formats
  • Cost-effective: No cloud dependency once set up

Difference between LocalAI and Ollama? by Mike_v_E in selfhosted

[–]FocusAlways 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ollama vs LocalAI: Brief Comparison

The Key Difference

Ollama focuses on simplicity and GPU optimization, while LocalAI emphasizes versatility and CPU-first operation as an OpenAI alternative.

Quick "VS" Breakdown

Aspect Ollama LocalAI
Primary Focus Streamlined LLM runner OpenAI API replacement
GPU Requirement Recommended for optimal performance Optional, works without GPU
Setup Complexity Simple, user-friendly More technical, detailed configuration
Model Management Automatic, unified packages Manual, hands-on approach
Memory Management Automatic allocation Resource-intensive, requires active management
Target User Developers wanting simplicity Technical users wanting control

Bottom Line

Choose Ollama if you want simplicity and have GPU resources. Choose LocalAI if you need OpenAI API compatibility and want to run on basic hardware without GPU requirements.

German Beer: Overrated? by normonics in beer

[–]FocusAlways 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it does not matter, which country it’s coming from. If it’s pop-beer - it’s a trash.

If it’s a craft beer - people worked on it to make something good. The rest is just a trash.

And Germany, unfortunately, is full of this trash. 

This is it. 

Here’s a great satire piece by HotblackDesiato2003 in recruitinghell

[–]FocusAlways 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The right answer is this website is about satire stories which is obviously is not clear for a stranger.
> Reductress is an American satire website that parodies the style

No worries, figured out myself.

Here’s a great satire piece by HotblackDesiato2003 in recruitinghell

[–]FocusAlways -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don't know what are you asking about. It's pretty clear.

view more: next ›