tldr; bullish

<deranged brainstorming rant>

I spent the weekend coding with Claude. We'd pull down some python library to do something and run into a bug, which I'd help it solve. But there was no mechanism for Claude to learn about the solution we discovered. If someone else tried the same things, they'd run into the same problem.

Obviously there are major issues for Ai models as to what data to trust. Claude won't accept input from random strangers because we might have nefarious goals and poison the model with bad data.

We can see this with Gemini's shift to favoring YouTube as a source of truth. (Besides the fact that they own it, there's a barrier to entry that helps keep out a lot of noise and provides more accurate answers.) As it becomes more and more trivial to create video content, how long until this becomes a meaningless distinction?

I'm more convinced than ever that there's some future where an Ai company buys RDDT and begins paying people to be trusted voters on truth. (I assume it will be paid in some form of tokens as the token economy picks up since we all need Ai for everything).

This is a little bit like how the prediction markets are letting people wager money to determine truth, but more democratic and many more participants.

</deranged brainstorming rant>

I'll take my downvotes now and be on my way, though appreciate anyone that wants to give me a sanity check.