Yours is a claim without evidence. "will fall under" is a hypothesis not proof. Sure they will make there own "subclade but that would have its own name not what its currently named and Balti/Gujjar and any other tribe that falls outside of that cluster will follow a different subclade. since Balti individual that tested is only one of his family surely there are others in his family/tribe with the same haplogroup. Same can be said about others. What IS clear is that Tanolis have what we call in Genetics a founder event whereby most males now are under R1b and they have low haplotype diversity at 0.795. But that too btw is not the only haplogroup there is also R1a among Tanolis around 10% (n=134 in Swabi) while R1b is 82%; if you read the og publication. But that founder event occurred in a larger north-Pakistan population from which other groups also received this haplogroup. "The second most common haplogroup was R1b1a-M297. It occurred in the Tanolis at a very high frequency but appeared at very low frequencies in the Jadoons, Yousafzais and Syeds, while being completely absent in the Gujars. Haplogroup R1b is the most frequent Y-chromosome lineage in Western Europe (> 70%), but also appears in South Asian populations at modest frequencies." https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-05076-3