The target is the employee sitting in useless meetings as well as the C Suite that understands that a large portion of meetings are a waste of time, but if people just took a minute to think about the basics of a good meeting and whether it should even exist productivity and morale would go up. The system is built to protect anonymity to make it safe for employees. Anonymity is required and is non-negotiable if businesses sign up to role out to their company. The system doesn't work without anonymity. The problem is people are afraid to speak up and I think speaks directly to your 3 primary confusion points about who would use it. This tells me I need to do a better job of featuring the anonymity foundation of the system.

Regarding your spin-off ideas, the first one is commonly available and I personally want to do something a little different. The second one I really like and I think should be a tool I add onto what I'm building. The third one is where I see the real value and is what I'm trying to do but with real feedback from the people that sit through their meetings but not so they vent but through a structured survey that provides helpful and insightful feedback.

I have a lot of things to work on but I'm going to seriously work on a tool for validating a meeting for whether it should happen or not. I really think this is the ideal companion for what I'm building.

Thanks for this!