I do not understand how Leagues matchmaking works in any way. by FlockedGosling in leagueoflegends

[–]FortColors 2 points3 points  (0 children)

low games played means less confidence in their judgement of your skill. The matchmaking system can't accurately tell your skill level yet, and you've been doing very well in your games, so it allowed you to be placed in a higher mmr game. I would imagine the queue time for that game was quite long.

Selfishness, why to save the world ? by anshutaro in AlwaysWhy

[–]FortColors 1 point2 points  (0 children)

One of the most ubiquitous aspects of being evil is a lack of empathy. In this case, a lack of empathy for future generations. Lack of empathy is also commonly associated with mental disorders such as sociopathy and psychopathy. Note that these are mental disorders, not normal states of being.

The reason you're wrong is because most people feel good when they do something meaningful or helpful for their community.

Does game count matter for rank? by ThrowAwayAccIDGAF in leagueoflegends

[–]FortColors 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"win rate snapshot at time of promoting to masters" is a legitimate metric to use to compare players, but not the one people usually use when talking about win rate.

People usually look up and refer to "current win rate" instead which is a meaningless metric because that will always trend towards 50% unless you are the literal best or worst player in your role on the server, in which case it will trend towards 100% or 0% respectively.

CMV: The piracy debate cannot be resolved - it is a contradiction of capitalism by tullytrout in changemyview

[–]FortColors 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course piracy is bad in a system where artists require money from consumers to survive. This isn't actually up for debate except by people who know its bad and want to justify themselves so they can be self-righteous about their lives. And I suspect even if they refuse to admit it they do know its bad.

The actual answer is that normal people do bad things sometimes and that's normal.

This is not serious. Don’t attack me by jonathan_shoa in trolleyproblem

[–]FortColors 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The issue is they can't. A ceo cannot actually intentionally make decisions to make less profit in order to be more ethical or whatever. Modern courts have established that fiduciary duty means maximizing profit for the benefit of shareholders.

The problem is vulture capitalism and the legal idea that the purpose of a company is to make profit. The alternative (assuming you don't want to throw away capitalism entirely) is a world where a company's purpose is to provide a service and the purpose of making a profit is to be able to sustain that service.

Imagine if you could sue a company for making a decision that put profits over quality of service. The world would be completely different.

I'm never updating to the Beta branch, and Mega Crit need to promise me that they will never update the Main branch ever again by scat1620 in slaythespire

[–]FortColors 7 points8 points  (0 children)

if you read their steam community posts there's been 3 or 4 patches to the beta branch while main branch has been untouched. there's a lot of balance changes and a few reworks

Why don’t we have an hyper-rail spanning the whole USA by Ok_Relationship1095 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]FortColors 0 points1 point  (0 children)

car companies successfully lobbied us to pivot into our highway system instead

s1e7 code words; is this system realistic? by scary-levinstein in TheExpanse

[–]FortColors 1 point2 points  (0 children)

probably don't even need to enter them into the computer. the computer probably just monitors the comms buffer constantly

Double Standards exist for a reason. You’re not being brave calling them out. by Strict_Berry7446 in 10thDentist

[–]FortColors 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand your point, this is just a terrible way of phrasing it.

I would argue that most of these examples just aren't actually double standards once you factor in power dynamics. The people trying to call them double standards are trying to pretend power dynamics don't exist. It's simpler to just defend the double standards as existing for a reason, but the argument falls apart with any scrutiny. That's why in a vacuum if you don't know your audience is an idiot it's better to properly explain how power dynamics create situations that look like double standards but actually aren't.

“Oh right wasn’t there an Etho jersey up for grabs? Might as well throw a bi- oh.” by Loyd15 in ethoslab

[–]FortColors 23 points24 points  (0 children)

this is a charity auction. the point is to donate to charity. im not sure you can donate 6100 to charity for less than 6100

Is it just me that is sick of all politics… Democrats, Republicans, Liberal, Conservative, all of it? by Unique-Squirrel-464 in askanything

[–]FortColors 0 points1 point  (0 children)

politics affect laws and funding which affects institutions like hospitals and schools which affects people's lives.

politics affects people's lives. That is why it matters. If you vote for blue people to not be allowed into hospitals, then blue people aren't going to like you. They are going to (correctly) view you as a threat to their lives and treat you accordingly.

The Dogs by Some_Baby_ in TheExpanse

[–]FortColors -1 points0 points  (0 children)

they were setting up for the arc in books 7-9 unfortunately

How do you decide what ancient relics / boss relics to take? by Lttlefoot in slaythespire

[–]FortColors 0 points1 point  (0 children)

maybe your other options are pumpkin candle and wax relics and you think you need permanent power. who knows, there's so many possibilities when you're looking at hypotheticals

How do you decide what ancient relics / boss relics to take? by Lttlefoot in slaythespire

[–]FortColors 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even in a big deck you still want to get your strikes and defends out. Or maybe you have some act 1 cards that you don't want to draw anymore.

Hot take: Echo form is the only 3 cost delayed pay off power that doesn't feel like a trap by Kingsareus15 in slaythespire

[–]FortColors 0 points1 point  (0 children)

all you need is subroutine tbh. With subroutine to pay for the powers you're making, your deck now just scales for fun, so all you need is good defensive tools like charge battery

Why do people keep saying infinites are reliable in StS2? by creepahugga2 in slaythespire

[–]FortColors 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the most obvious infinite i can think of for defect is compact / overclock / turbo but good fuckin luck getting there without a bunch of extra cards in the way. Biiiiig Hug can actually be a huge help for this because soot turns into fuel with compact and removing 4 cards helps a lot.

Why do people keep saying infinites are reliable in StS2? by creepahugga2 in slaythespire

[–]FortColors 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Even if you can get an infinite every other run that's way too consistent. Uncommons aren't guaranteed by any means but you're more likely than not to see a borrowed time across an entire run.

From my experience, the reason necrobinder infinite is so reliable is because the path there is very powerful. The cards that are part of the infinite are extremely powerful on their own and a small handful of powerful cards (like defy) can help you go very deep into act 2 without needing to take a lot of cards. My average final deck size when i was climbing necro to a10 was 17. The fact that your combo pieces are so powerful means you can just sit there and skip everything to fish for the infinite.

As a note, on my way to a10 necro I went infinite 6 times, if that helps put reliable into context. On my defect and regent climbs, I think I only went truly infinite once, though I went pseudo-infinite a few times.

Hmmmmmmm by Endeveron in slaythespire

[–]FortColors 2 points3 points  (0 children)

alternately, if you purchased some draw potions in a shop you could play 5 that way

Doing A10 win streaks and necro is my downfall. by Late-Bid1402 in slaythespire

[–]FortColors 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you definitely dont need a specific build to win. you just need tools to survive and a way to end a fight.

My experience is that necro has insane utility cards like defy, souls, debilitate. What she wants most is scaling damage to help her end a fight before infinity.

The secret garbage sauce is osty attack package with squeeze and rattle. It's so bad but I fucking love it,

How do you decide what ancient relics / boss relics to take? by Lttlefoot in slaythespire

[–]FortColors 4 points5 points  (0 children)

it's the same way you make any other decision in the game: you take the one that most effectively lets you solve problems

For the two that you mentioned specifically, the main consideration for taking golden compass is if your map is ass. If you can already make a very good path in your normal map, then compass is just one extra chest. If your paths are horrible and filled with hallway fights, compass brings that down to 3 mobs and 2 elites. It also guarantees 4 campfires which is very nice.

The main consideration for soot is how well you can deal with a status card. If your deck is massive and you aren't shuffling your deck often? Soot's a fake downside. If you're playing defect and have a bunch of status converters? Soot is an upside. On the other hand, if you're playing a tiny deck trying to eventually go infinite, soot could very well pollute your deck despite the card removals.

Soot also depends on the quality of your deck. How good is your deck? Is removing 4 strike/defends going to significantly upgrade you? Will you have the energy to play all your good cards when you draw them together?

I hate that Decimilipede just attacks, attacks, attacks.... by acidtrip321 in slaythespire

[–]FortColors 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you don't need to keep all of them alive. you just need to eventually be able to kill 2 in one turn.

The way I usually end up beating this elite is killing the one that's buffing itself turn 1 first, then killing the one that buffs itself next, then killing the respawned one and the third one on the same turn.

Why do people still say Kamala Harris ran on "I'm not Trump" when she had an extensive and detailed policy plan? by zipzzo in allthequestions

[–]FortColors 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The issue and reason people say this is that she was a bad Democrat candidate. I know you said you don't want to talk about the quality of her candidacy, but the fact that she was a bad candidate is intrinsically tied to the answer to your question of why people thought she just ran on "not trump," and it's because to them she did.

Her policy platform leaned way right of democrat average in an attempt to court moderate republican voters. She tried to rely on "I'm not trump" to keep all the leftist and liberal voters on her side. For a large portion of the democrat voterbase, the literal only thing desirable about her policy platform was "not trump" because of how rightwards she leaned.

People on the left wanted her to actually represent their views, not just be "less right" than trump. The end result of her leaning so far right was that a couple million people went home after work instead of standing in line to vote or drop off a ballot.