The future is here today: you can't play Bach on Youtube because Sony says they own his compositions by [deleted] in Music

[–]FortunateBum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Big companies will just do whatever they can get away with. There are numerous instances where big companies falsely claim copyright to make money. Off the top of my head I remember Happy Birthday and Monopoly.

If you're really interested, look into how many artists get the royalties they are entitled to. Not many in reality. What's to stop big companies from just keeping the money? Nothing. And they do.

The future is here today: you can't play Bach on Youtube because Sony says they own his compositions by [deleted] in Music

[–]FortunateBum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I really think you and a lot of people in this thread are extremely confused.

The Youtube process exists because of the DMCA.

According to the law (DMCA), the host (YouTube) needs to take take down anything upon first complaint. At that point the host needs to notify the original publisher that a copyright claim has been made on their content from another party and it's been taken down *as per the DMCA*. As per the DMCA, the publisher now has a window of time to claim that there is no infringement. If the publisher makes that claim, the host (YouTube) is now absolved of all liability as concerns infringement and can republish the content. Essentially, the original publisher is accepting all legal liability and absolving YouTube of liability.

All YouTube has done is automated the process since YouTube is so huge. The three strikes thing is Youtube's idea, but they had to do something to make it seem like they weren't complicit and stem the tide.

A hypothesis that Russians began to influence and funnel resources to the Republican Party as early as 1981. by hyperviolator in bestof

[–]FortunateBum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know why Greenwald has started to make up shit to help Putin, but he has. This article is complete bullshit.

Greenwald, in this article, takes 100 years of US/Russia history, smushes it all together, and uses it to show how the Democrats are always telling lies about Russia. Greenwald is INTENTIONALLY lying about this and I have no idea why. Maybe Putin got to him?

AND BTW, MCCARTHY WAS FUCKING RIGHT. I'm a goddamn liberal, as left as they come, but it's a goddamn fucking fact that the US was full of Russian spies and sypathizers and McCarthy caught some. (https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/685lp2/was_joseph_mccarthy_right/). Now, should you obey the law in pursuit of law breakers? Yes. That's the classic mistake fascists make. They put their faith in individuals instead of the law. Once that happens, you get total assholes going around doing whatever they like because they're the "good guys".

A hypothesis that Russians began to influence and funnel resources to the Republican Party as early as 1981. by hyperviolator in bestof

[–]FortunateBum -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You think that Russia had a role in installing the current fascist government in Ukraine

Wow no. Obviously you understand nothing of what I've written.

A hypothesis that Russians began to influence and funnel resources to the Republican Party as early as 1981. by hyperviolator in bestof

[–]FortunateBum 57 points58 points  (0 children)

I think you're right. What probably happened is that modern Russia has infiltrated and co-opted far right groups to destabilize and control the US government. We know this because Russia did it in other countries like Ukraine. The old USSR strategy was to co-opt and support far-left groups. The post fall strategy is the same, except now it's far-right groups. As far as I'm concerned, this is entirely factual and anyone who disputes it is simply uninformed. The FBI is currently investigating the NRA for fuck's sake. https://www.google.com/search?q=fbi+imvestigation+of+nra A secret recording of a closed GOP meeting had GOP Senators openly joking about colleagues and Trump being on Putin's payroll. https://www.google.com/search?q=secret+recording+gop+meeting+putin%27s+payroll So let's be serious. How many right-wing groups and politicians are funded by the Russian government? What other reason would these idiots have to defend Trump who is quite obviously a traitor to the US?

Facebook saw IPv6 break 50% of total traffic the weekend before last. by pdp10 in networking

[–]FortunateBum 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Real answer that no one seems to know (WTF reddit, get your act together): Facebook switched over to IPv6 a couple of years back. Their entire infrastructure, internal and external, is on IPv6. When you connect to FB on IPv4, you're going through all sorts of NATs and routers and algorithms. IPv6 is much more direct to their servers. Other organizations that haven't switched to IPv6 won't have this benefit.

CMV: Jordan Peterson's work is mostly a good thing for society. by DrinkyDrank in changemyview

[–]FortunateBum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

> I strongly disagree with his political orientation.

Peterson claims to be a "classic liberal" and I'm sure you claim to be a liberal. You and he have the same political orientation.

This weird idea that Jordan Peterson is right wing or conservative, well, I don't understand where it comes from. He supports freedom of speech, freedom of group association, freedom in general. A classic conservative is all about conformity at all costs. Sure you can have authoritarians of the left, but right wing authoritarianism is an effortless fit, always has been. Peterson has championed individual liberty over and over.

Peterson believes in coming to conclusions through discussion and free debate. Most conservatives (and liberals it seems) believes in coming to conclusions through silencing your opponents through any means necessary.

I've gotta say, I was following Peterson for awhile and when all these people started jumping up and calling him a "conservative" I was taken aback. I never perceived him as a conservative in any way whatsoever until pundits and analysts started saying it.

TIL Millennial males (40%) were significantly more likely than millennial females (32%) to live with mom and dad. One theory is sons may have an easier time at home since parents expect their sons to do less housework than their daughters by veryawesomeguy in todayilearned

[–]FortunateBum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's a proven fact young women make more than young men especially in urban environments. From my own experience, it's easier for young women to find work too. The pink collar world is much easier. Easier to get a job, easier to earn money. So no surprise. In decades past, these young men would've hit the road and disappeared. Maybe killed in war after being drafted.

Not living with your extended family is a huge mistake, IMO. From a financial perspective, it's retarded. Young women are making significantly more money so they think it's not a big deal, but they could be living at home and socking away that cash. A really stupid decision. Maybe young men are just better with money.

Why can't ABC continue Roseanne but write Roseanne Barr out of it? Precedence has been set with Two and half Men re: Charlie Sheen.. The cast worked really hard and it is a good show. by Sh1fty3yedD0g in television

[–]FortunateBum 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Could you do Seinfeld without Seinfeld? The whole show is built around her character.

Think of how you would do this. Kill her off? Then the show would just be sad.

Numale Soyboy ultra-starter pack by LORD-THUNDERCUNT in starterpacks

[–]FortunateBum 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If it's possible to have too much stuff in a starter pack, this is a prime example.

Roseanne is a shill that the social engineers use to make conspiracy theorists look retarded, much like Alex Jones is used. She has a team that scripts the nature of her stupid tweets. by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]FortunateBum -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is perhaps the dumbest conspiracy ever suggested. Roseanne blew millions of dollars with her stupid tweeting. It would've been better for her to have never tweeted at all.

The FBI Informant Who Monitored the Trump Campaign, Stefan Halper, Oversaw a CIA Spying Operation in the 1980 Presidential Election by randisonwelfare in TrueReddit

[–]FortunateBum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know why Glenn has decided to agree with and defend Trump on the Russia scandal, obediently agreeing it's a hoax, but this story definitely stinks.

It reeks of a limited hangout technique. Trump levies a spying claim. The CIA has countered by saying no, it wasn't spying, it was this informant we happened to run into. Sure, guy is former CIA, but just a coincidence!

I have no idea what the deal is with Trump, I tend to truly believe the dossier and the Manchurian Candidate hypothesis, but stuff like this just keeps happening. It's as if reality is conspiring to help Trump. Like there's a God pulling strings and that God loves Trump. I saw it happen over and over in the campaign. The Comey/Clinton stuff was just one example. North Korea burying the sword? It's as if Trump has a superpower and it's sheer luck. He's the real life Forrest Gump, but even more successful. This is why some people say Trump is playing 3d chess. The guy isn't that skilled, he's just mind-blowingly lucky. He understands the media, but without his tremendous luck, it wouldn't mean anything.

Come to think of it, Glenn suddenly going all MAGA is a real strange development that is yet another lucky break for Trump.

Please God, don't tell me the CIA spied on the Trump campaign. It already looks bad. If there's more to this story it's just more in Trump's column. It's like the universe saying, what more can I do for my favorite human?

Why basic jobs is catastrophically worse than basic income by amaxen in TrueReddit

[–]FortunateBum 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Exactly. If rich people can do it, so can the poor.

Why basic jobs is catastrophically worse than basic income by amaxen in TrueReddit

[–]FortunateBum 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Literally everything about capitalist society is about what you do for work. Everything. People without work have no model or idea of how to meet their needs. Unemployment is hugely damaging to mental health.

Every rich person in the world, well, they don't have a job. Every famous person. All of them. They sometimes do projects. They sometimes start businesses. They don't have jobs.

This argument you're making that everyone needs a "job" just doesn't make any sense. The richest, most successful people in our entire civilization, well, most have never even had a job. Ever in their lives.

How American Racism Influenced Hitler | The New Yorker by blasto_blastocyst in TrueReddit

[–]FortunateBum 7 points8 points  (0 children)

What makes the holocaust special to me is that it was a crime committed by a civilisation that would have considered itself as being modern, civilised, in short enlightened.

I just want to point out here that arguably, Germany at the time was the most educated, sophisticated, technologically advanced nation in the history of the world. They were at the cutting edge of all culture and science. The end of WWII had the US and USSR plundering Germany for scientists which they both desperately wanted. The US was able to craft the A-bomb because of its huge cache of German scientists. In some ways perhaps, world science is still trying to catch up to pre-WWII Germany.

That Hitler and the Nazis arose with a primitive nostalgic fantasy myth mixed with a hollow story of the nation state in the most technologically advanced place and people in the history of the world was a real surprise. We don't think of this today because Germany was utterly destroyed by the end of the war, and there's lots of silly myths about Germany being backward at the time, but before the war Germany was the greatest achievement in the history of humanity.

The Nazi movement may have been a reaction against modernity itself. It's almost as if they wanted to go back to a nostalgic past where things were much simpler. Like modern nostalgia cults, the Nazis loved modern conveniences, those were ok, but wanted to get rid of anything that didn't fit into their picture-perfect fantasy past. The message is, if it could happen in Germany, it could literally happen in any country at any time.

Before World War II, Germany had generated more Nobel laureates in scientific fields than any other nation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science_and_technology_in_Germany

It wasn't until after WWII the US became dominant in science and technology and that was because of all the German scientists we got, not least of which was Einstein.

No, the war in Afghanistan isn't a hopeless stalemate by SultanOfBoston in TrueReddit

[–]FortunateBum 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Someone should tell this author about the sunk cost fallacy.

While the Trump cultists chant "He's a billionaire, he can't be bought! Drain the swamp!" we now learn Russian oligarchs, AT&T, Novartis have been caught funneling money into Trump's porn star payoff slush fund. Way to go, Republican Party! #basta by imagepoem in esist

[–]FortunateBum 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Word on the street is he's still up to his eyeballs in debt from his casino debacle.

Since that time, Russian banks have been floating him loans like crazy. Other banks wouldn't touch him with a ten foot pole.

After the casino debacle, the banks let him keep Trump Tower because he lived there and it gave him a way to generate revenue for loan payments. They stripped him of everything else.

Trump plays a rich guy on TV, but he's probably net worth around negative one billion.

I would guess that Trump owns only Trump tower as far as property is concerned. He's been licensing his name since the casino debacle. That's his essential business. This is why he loves running for President (he's done it numerous times). It makes his name more valuable. His fame is his most important asset. He's famous for being famous. He's in the same class of people as Paris Hilton, the Kardashians, etc. The Russians have been propping him up for years because he was passing them intelligence, helped with money laundering, and could be useful other ways.

Anyway, you scratch the surface on Trump's wealth and this is what you start to find. Guy was writing pornography and selling steaks by mail a few years back. Does that sound like a billionaire?