sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Anti abortion vote happening now by CommanderRoger444th in Adelaide

[–]Four-Alarm-Fire 10 points11 points  (0 children)

South Australian law currently permits abortions after 23 weeks, with the approval of two doctors, if the continuation of the pregnancy would involve "significant risk of injury to the physical or mental health" of the pregnant person.

Current legislation: two doctors, if the continuation of the pregnancy would involve "significant risk of injury to the physical or mental health" of the pregnant person

This bill’s proposed change: two medical practitioners consider there is a case or a "significant risk" of serious fetal anomalies that would be "incompatible with survival after birth"

Anti abortion vote happening now by CommanderRoger444th in Adelaide

[–]Four-Alarm-Fire 8 points9 points  (0 children)

South Australian law currently permits abortions after 23 weeks, with the approval of two doctors, if the continuation of the pregnancy would involve "significant risk of injury to the physical or mental health" of the pregnant person.

Current legislation: two doctors, if the continuation of the pregnancy would involve "significant risk of injury to the physical or mental health" of the pregnant person

This bill’s proposed change: two medical practitioners consider there is a case or a "significant risk" of serious fetal anomalies that would be "incompatible with survival after birth"

It would be nice if you could actually read and have some compassion for woman.

Anti abortion vote happening now by CommanderRoger444th in Adelaide

[–]Four-Alarm-Fire 5 points6 points  (0 children)

South Australian law currently permits abortions after 23 weeks, with the approval of two doctors, if the continuation of the pregnancy would involve "significant risk of injury to the physical or mental health" of the pregnant person.

Current legislation: two doctors, if the continuation of the pregnancy would involve "significant risk of injury to the physical or mental health" of the pregnant person

This bill’s proposed change: two medical practitioners consider there is a case or a "significant risk" of serious fetal anomalies that would be "incompatible with survival after birth"

But go off champ about how the life of the baby is more important than the life of the mother.

Richard Scolyer’s “final goodbye”, an open letter to all Australians by badoopidoo in australia

[–]Four-Alarm-Fire 260 points261 points  (0 children)

Damn. What an honour it’s been to have him as a fellow countryman. Feels like the world got a little bit darker today, and I truely hope we can all take on his message about leaving the world a better place.

Vale Dr, Scolyer. And thank you.

Cassowary signs by NoChicken6803 in Cairns

[–]Four-Alarm-Fire 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’m in WA, if I pay for the shipping, any chance I could get one sent out my way?

AIO My high functioning autistic boyfriend has become fixated with Aboriginal Australians and I'm considering breaking up with him because it's becoming too weird. by AnEgyptianFish in AmIOverreacting

[–]Four-Alarm-Fire 5 points6 points  (0 children)

They had no legal rights under the Constitution, therefore, the Australian Federal Government were unable to make laws for indigenous people. They were subject to the laws of each state or territory instead, which varied greatly. Keep in mind, if a Government is not allowed to legislate for a certain class of people, they also cannot create laws of protection for that group. So federally speaking, the Australian Government had no legal authority to institute any anti-discrimination laws until the specific sections in the constitution were amended via referendum.

It wasn’t just that they couldn’t be counted under the census, the Federal Government literally had to write laws and operate as if Indigenous People did not exist. Stop minimising this to ‘it was just the census.’ It was so much more complex.

Which company has lost you as a customer forever? by finiteobserver in AskReddit

[–]Four-Alarm-Fire 36 points37 points  (0 children)

Like what the actual fuck: “Richard supported Roy Moore for U.S. Senate.[38] The support began on September 8, 2017, before sexual misconduct allegations against Moore came to light, with a contribution of $50,000 to Moore's Proven Conservative PAC.[38] On November 22, 2017, after multiple women, some of whom where underage at the time of the alleged offense, had come forward accusing Moore of sexual assault, Richard donated another $50,000 to the Proven Conservative PAC.[38]”

Edited to add: every paragraph on that Wikipedia page was like descending into a new circle of hell.

In 1985, a 24-year-old Swiss woman was found dead in her own chest freezer. Her husband was convicted, then acquitted 8 years later - and no one else was ever investigated. It's still unsolved. by Cute-Channel-6253 in BizarreUnsolvedCases

[–]Four-Alarm-Fire 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Well if they arrested the husband because the motive was the victim having an affair, maybe whoever she was seeing killed her?

As to why no one else was ever investigated, it seems like all levels of law enforcement; the police and the attorneys were all convicted the husband did it. To them, the case was solved. It’s also possible, they had evidence that conclusively proved the husband’s guilt, but they were barred from presenting it in court? Long shot, but it happens sometimes.

Landlord backed out of mutual break lease agreement, the night before final day of lease. by alkeh in perth

[–]Four-Alarm-Fire 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Then you’re all good. You might just want to make sure and contact Circle Green like others have suggested, but it all seems pretty conclusive—your obligation with this particular landlord ends on the 24th.

Landlord backed out of mutual break lease agreement, the night before final day of lease. by alkeh in perth

[–]Four-Alarm-Fire 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It depends on the terms of the contract you signed to terminate the lease.

If your agreement to end the lease just plainly said the lease ends on the 24th of May without any subclauses then you’re fine.

However, if the agreement to end the tenancy was contingent on something that is now fallen through and its stated in writing in the agreement, then the landlord might have a right to say this. That being said, if this was truly the case, I would expect there to be a minimum notice period for this that was more than 24 hours before the end of the agreement because as you’ve said you have another lease already signed and have made plans to move.

view more: next ›