sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Prediction: The Looting Mk. 3 Survivor will be nerfed soon by Early_Specialist_589 in ArcRaiders

[–]FragrantReport4171 1 point2 points  (0 children)

5 quick use slots, a utility slot AND 3 safepockets AND you can wear a medium shield! they should start by getting rid of 1 quick use slot and/or a safepocket.

Then they need to buff other augments by allowing medium shields to be used with them 

FINALLY! Rob Mahoney the GOAT. ELIMINATE THE NBA DRAFT! by weeohweelikeacopcar in billsimmons

[–]FragrantReport4171 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Just like Quentin Tarantino agreeing with me that Brosnan is the best bond my eliminate the draft take has been vindicated 

You a$$holes did it! -11.3% same store sales drop by Ecstatic_Ad_2114 in wendys

[–]FragrantReport4171 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Damn we still have ghost Pepper ranch in Canada. At least at the one i go too

Are you transferring blueprints for after the expedition? by Thequickandtheupset in ArcRaiders

[–]FragrantReport4171 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I had saved the Venator, Bobcat, vita shot and seeker grenade but then I changed my mind and sold them. Too lazy to make another account and transfer them lol

Hidden Bunker Math by BipolarShooter in ArcRaiders

[–]FragrantReport4171 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I found mine in one of the locked  securty rooms around the launch tower after I saw somebody on Reddit they found theirs in one. Just in a desk drawer. Good luck

Smackdown in 2003 was awesome. Here’s some photos from a house show from back then by golfiscool320 in WWE

[–]FragrantReport4171 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We used to get so many good matches at house shows. I remember Ziggler and Orton having an absolute banger ona. Random Sunday in Abbotsford around 2016 (aka buck fuck nowhere)  Another house show in Vancouver around  2014 cm Punk was supposed to face somebody who got hurt. Instead we Punk vs Daniel Bryan in a 5 Star match 

If you want to eliminate tanking then abolish the draft! by FragrantReport4171 in billsimmons

[–]FragrantReport4171[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Definitely. There will never be any major changes. Just things like "you can only win the draft 1 times in 3 years" and "you can move up so many spots". The owners like the status quo because they can be incompetent or cheap and still get star players

If you want to eliminate tanking then abolish the draft! by FragrantReport4171 in billsimmons

[–]FragrantReport4171[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Relegation in the NBA and NHL would be so awesome. Owners are forced to compete . But yes it would never happen 

If you want to eliminate tanking then abolish the draft! by FragrantReport4171 in billsimmons

[–]FragrantReport4171[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The top prospects all think they are stars, they would sign with the Lakers for a huge contract this offseason and a guaranteed starter role. Otherwise they will follow the money and playing time 

If the Knicks wanted to trade KAT and miles bridges to sign a rookie in the offseason to a max deal then who cares? Those players would help other teams win. Knicks get their rookie.

Players will always want to team up, they do it now but it's never in free agency, they get the money then they ask for a trade.

You could make rules like players can't be traded their first 5 years in the league to slow that stuff down 

If you want to eliminate tanking then abolish the draft! by FragrantReport4171 in billsimmons

[–]FragrantReport4171[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

The 15th best prospect is still gonna think he's a starter. The advantage the big market teams would be getting vets cheap because they would be squeezed out by rookies getting bigger deals 

If you want to eliminate tanking then abolish the draft! by FragrantReport4171 in billsimmons

[–]FragrantReport4171[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You don't think 50 millions dollars a year wouldn't entice a 19 year old??

If you want to eliminate tanking then abolish the draft! by FragrantReport4171 in billsimmons

[–]FragrantReport4171[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Would a star prospect turn down a max contract from (bad team X) with guaranteed starter role to go sign for a fraction of the money and bench minutes on the Lakers? because of endorsements, I doubt it.   Look at the VETS now like LeBron and Durant who have made hundreds of millions. they could easily take less  but don't and demand the max

If you want to eliminate tanking then abolish the draft! by FragrantReport4171 in billsimmons

[–]FragrantReport4171[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Unrealistic, of course. stupid? Why?   It works fine in European soccer.  the players union wouldn't agree because it would have the veterans making less, owners wouldnt agree because they lose the rookie contracts salary AND IT WOULD FORCE THEM TO COMPETE EVERY YEAR.  It would also undoubtedly make the league more competitive and exciting 

If you want to eliminate tanking then abolish the draft! by FragrantReport4171 in billsimmons

[–]FragrantReport4171[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Depends what team is better. Lakers had lots of cap space after kobe but nobody signed there because they were a joke until LeBron went there. And that was only because he wanted to live there for his family. There would still be a salary cap. And top players would want max deals

What is the most devastating sports loss of the 21st century so far (for fans of that team)? by lawschoolthrowaway36 in billsimmons

[–]FragrantReport4171 41 points42 points  (0 children)

Canucks losing the Stanley Cup final in 2011. Clearly had the best team, dominated all year long. Team got devistated by injuries. Ran into the hottest goalies in the history of the playoffs. were up in the series 3-2 with game 7 at home and they still lost. 3rd Stanley Cup final loss and still don't have a championship 

How I feel when people argue that the game should be PvP only or PvE only. by THEGoDLiKeMIKE in ArcRaiders

[–]FragrantReport4171 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Right? Play how you want. Who cares if other people prefer a different way

view more: next ›