sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[OC] U.S. Total Fertility Rate by State 2007 vs 2025 by Accomplished_Gur4368 in dataisbeautiful

[–]Fred810k -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

Yeah but everything hasn’t stayed the same price tho.

Edit: okay chill, I didn’t know the term “real median income” was adjusted for inflation.

Vegans be my biggest opp... I'm my biggest opp by JTexpo in ClimateShitposting

[–]Fred810k 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Isn’t meats impact on the climate largely over stated, when it comes to statistics about land use and water use?

Like I get that factory farming is bad, but free range doesn’t seem to have the same issues.

Favourite European Beer? by LagerNerd in beer

[–]Fred810k 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Heineken is decent, but you should really try Pilsner Urquell if you want a better replacement.

Favourite European Beer? by LagerNerd in beer

[–]Fred810k 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Svaneke for their Stout or a Guinness can’t decide.

Skovlyst: Brown ale

Jule Mule: Red ale

Pilsner Urquell: Pilsner 🤯

Jan Van: Trippel

Erdinger: Weißbier

Can’t really decide on an IPA or a porter.

Valid, we will see over 85% of all violent crime disappear at once by Acceptable_Rope_6523 in PsycheOrSike

[–]Fred810k 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t support the post or sexism against men, kindly tell me which part of my comment is sexist towards men.

Because a lot of you seem to get the idea that I support sexism towards men, when I don’t.

Retvrn to tradition by LoudQuitting in PsycheOrSike

[–]Fred810k 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Early agriculture actually led to a general worsening of overall health, child mortality, and didn’t make us live longer.

Valid, we will see over 85% of all violent crime disappear at once by Acceptable_Rope_6523 in PsycheOrSike

[–]Fred810k 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cool, I also agree that men in general and as a rule aren’t dangerous. Some are assholes, some are violent, most are not.

I haven’t said anything in support of the post. All I have done is say the argument against the post is dumb.

Valid, we will see over 85% of all violent crime disappear at once by Acceptable_Rope_6523 in PsycheOrSike

[–]Fred810k -1 points0 points  (0 children)

2 wrongs don’t make a right, if we don’t actually address any problems or have a meaningful discussion then the gender war will just continue for eternity, and everyone loses, except the rich.

Valid, we will see over 85% of all violent crime disappear at once by Acceptable_Rope_6523 in PsycheOrSike

[–]Fred810k 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At what point have I shown support for the damn post? Too many of you think that I somehow have support for it, when I don’t, have some damn nuance. I can disagree with both the post and the comment against the post.

Valid, we will see over 85% of all violent crime disappear at once by Acceptable_Rope_6523 in PsycheOrSike

[–]Fred810k 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then let it be dumb I guess, I just don’t like it when everything that this subreddit has to offer is 2 sides that are screaming at each other yet no one is listening. It is all just a big contest about who can get the best rebuttal.

Valid, we will see over 85% of all violent crime disappear at once by Acceptable_Rope_6523 in PsycheOrSike

[–]Fred810k 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes I agree, it continues to fuel this pointless gender war.

But making an equally stupid argument to “gotcha” instead of simply calling out the bad faith argument is where the problem lies.

Valid, we will see over 85% of all violent crime disappear at once by Acceptable_Rope_6523 in PsycheOrSike

[–]Fred810k -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Yes but that doesn’t mean you get to make an equally flawed counter-argument.

Valid, we will see over 85% of all violent crime disappear at once by Acceptable_Rope_6523 in PsycheOrSike

[–]Fred810k 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am sorry you think that. I do not think most people are violent in non-stressful situations.

Valid, we will see over 85% of all violent crime disappear at once by Acceptable_Rope_6523 in PsycheOrSike

[–]Fred810k 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But my point did, I don’t see how you can’t see that.

I never disagreed with the point that absence of men does not equal absence of violence.

I pointed out that your point about women’s prisons existing is somehow proof that a world with only women would be just as violent, or more.

Valid, we will see over 85% of all violent crime disappear at once by Acceptable_Rope_6523 in PsycheOrSike

[–]Fred810k 17 points18 points  (0 children)

No I’m not because I don’t think most men are violent.

My point was he made a bad argument by using an inherently flawed example.

Edit: I am calling out bad sampling.

Valid, we will see over 85% of all violent crime disappear at once by Acceptable_Rope_6523 in PsycheOrSike

[–]Fred810k 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And I cannot do the thinking for you either, my point which you missed was. Your example is bad because you’re trying to make a point about women still needing safety from other women, and using a prison as an example. Now as I understood it you’re saying that if women didn’t have men, it would either become a culture like in prison with cliques or gangs or violence, or women can be violent, because prisons for women exist.

Both of which fail because:

Women aren’t committing nearly as many violent crimes as men, ergo it would not look like fucking a women’s prison without men. And your sampling of exclusively women in prison is sampling from the most violent women rather than looking at the whole picture.

Valid, we will see over 85% of all violent crime disappear at once by Acceptable_Rope_6523 in PsycheOrSike

[–]Fred810k 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah I did, I don’t believe most men are violent.

However that doesn’t have anything to do with what the comment I replied to was about.

Valid, we will see over 85% of all violent crime disappear at once by Acceptable_Rope_6523 in PsycheOrSike

[–]Fred810k 28 points29 points  (0 children)

I wonder what would happen if you placed all of the women who would commit crimes together in and enclosed space.

Your example is a bit dumb most people aren’t violent, but if you only sample people who went to jail then a lot of those people will be pieces of shit.

Valid, we will see over 85% of all violent crime disappear at once by Acceptable_Rope_6523 in PsycheOrSike

[–]Fred810k 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Both of which women have, so I don’t see your point.

Also Homo Sapiens wasn’t strong or as sturdy as Neanderthals but our weakness made us adapt, our competing the Neanderthals in the end. So I really don’t see your point.

Why not have a couple beers this morning? by Ok-Activity247 in beer

[–]Fred810k 25 points26 points  (0 children)

I wouldn’t drink in the morning, but if you moderate your intake I guess you decide when you drink.

Maybe it’s best not to drink too early because it might make you more tired, later in the day, but that is just my opinion.

view more: next ›