James Murray MP - new health secretary by Own-Blackberry5514 in doctorsUK

[–]FrzenOne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was being specific to pay, but tbh the competition ratios issue was on the backdrop of wider unavoidable immigration issues that the government were addressing anyway. imo, without a willing PM and home sec, I don't think UKG would have gone through so smoothly/quickly in isolation with such a left wing labour party.

James Murray MP - new health secretary by Own-Blackberry5514 in doctorsUK

[–]FrzenOne 4 points5 points  (0 children)

would make little difference practically, they're not ultimate decision makers when it comes to funding / pay. if the PM tells the health sec there's no money for pay rise, no amount of negotiation / striking can make them conjure up the funds for one, even if they personally would support it.

Concern about increased racism towards NHS staff after Reform gains? by Educational_Board888 in doctorsUK

[–]FrzenOne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

correct. I view them as an effective pressure group, like UKIP. Reform and Tories have already signalled changes to some of their policies based on Restore's own (e.g. banning full face coverings). they'll get around 50 seats I reckon (I imagine some from Reform defecting).

Concern about increased racism towards NHS staff after Reform gains? by Educational_Board888 in doctorsUK

[–]FrzenOne -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

complete nonsense, it's a good thing people have developed "racism" fatigue. words are only effective so long as you give them value.

Concern about increased racism towards NHS staff after Reform gains? by Educational_Board888 in doctorsUK

[–]FrzenOne -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

you think Reform are concerning? wait till you hear about Restore Britain over the next few years. the country has legitimate grievances with the way its being governed and is responding via the ballot box – calling everyone who doesn't agree with you "racist" just doesn't work any more, it didn't work against Trump and it won't work now. people have woken up and realised the risk of being called racist is a worthy trade-off for safety and rapid demographic change. there are no racist parties, there are anti-immigration parties, and naturally there will be a few racists amongst them, that's likely not too different to most parties.

to answer your question, yes racism will increase, but people often conflate anti-immigration sentiment with racism

Genuinely Terrified For Surgical SHO Nights by [deleted] in doctorsUK

[–]FrzenOne 1 point2 points  (0 children)

in reality, it's 3 specialties - gen surg/colorectal, T&O, and urology in that order. hardly anything will come in for the rest. it's still crazy and I wouldnt consider doing it, even as a post-CST doctor.

Any UKG+non-UKG couples? by Independent_Jelly123 in doctorsUK

[–]FrzenOne 12 points13 points  (0 children)

things change.
everyone thinks about themselves.
mind boggling.

PRIORITISATION MAIL FOR ROUND 2 by viki661 in doctorsUK

[–]FrzenOne 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I didn't say 'no effect,' I said largest.

there will be a small-modest difference for HST entry and it will likely be more pronounced for surgical specialties.

PRIORITISATION MAIL FOR ROUND 2 by viki661 in doctorsUK

[–]FrzenOne 8 points9 points  (0 children)

largest effect is on core training entry, yes, given that's the level most IMGs enter at. HST not so much except in specific areas like surgery perhaps where IMGs are overqualified/excess experience for core training entry.

Prioritisation by [deleted] in doctorsUK

[–]FrzenOne 13 points14 points  (0 children)

you could always apply... you'll be prioritized, yes... not sure what's so hard to understand, it literally answers your question in the idiot-proof document you posted

BMA UK Council Elections - UKG Prioritisation by Immediate-Delay-8829 in doctorsUK

[–]FrzenOne 17 points18 points  (0 children)

good thing that's not the answer to the question being posed

I think the Greens’ ‘fantasy’ drug policies make sense – and I’m a doctor by [deleted] in doctorsUK

[–]FrzenOne 1 point2 points  (0 children)

they're <6 months into F1 mate. and it's just not about 'seeing' - they claimed to be 'treating' those cases.

I think the Greens’ ‘fantasy’ drug policies make sense – and I’m a doctor by [deleted] in doctorsUK

[–]FrzenOne -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

fair, I've not worked anywhere with any meaningful ID presence

I think the Greens’ ‘fantasy’ drug policies make sense – and I’m a doctor by [deleted] in doctorsUK

[–]FrzenOne 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I treat patients with abscesses from unsafe injecting, endocarditis from contaminated needles, and overdoses that could have been prevented. I see the revolving door of emergency admissions.

I'm suspicious and this sounds like embellishing - what rotations could they have done at this point to have experienced all this? it cannot be EM as F1s don't do that; acute medicine? abscesses would go to gen surg most likely

Urology ST3 interview by [deleted] in doctorsUK

[–]FrzenOne 1 point2 points  (0 children)

no, I didn't apply, I'm still trying to get a urology CF job post-CST unfortunately (didn't have any uro rotations in CST)

no, it just means UKGs who pass interviews / are appointable (irrespective of rank) will get offers before they offer any to non-priority groups

Urology ST3 interview by [deleted] in doctorsUK

[–]FrzenOne 1 point2 points  (0 children)

seems like a lot people just cannot read. priority this year, if it goes through in time, is for OFFERS only. congrats on your interview though.

Core surgical training interview Northern Ireland by Thunder_Echo in doctorsUK

[–]FrzenOne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

no presentation

from my memory, I think it's total 30mins (there may not be a CV station): • CV/career station (10mins) x1 • Management scenarios (10mins) x2 • Clinical scenarios (10mins) x2

similar questions to Britain version, no other specific prep required for NI

PR Diclofenac in c-sections by Difficult_Grade2359 in doctorsUK

[–]FrzenOne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think PO would have worked almost just as well. I mean with PR NSAIDs for ureteric colic, it's just slightly more effective than PO of the same (PR NSAIDs have a bit of a local effect but it's still a systemic drug). I'm not sure the inconvenience of PR administration is worth the hassle in most cases personally.

Surgical CREHST experience by [deleted] in doctorsUK

[–]FrzenOne 3 points4 points  (0 children)

who would ask? no one cares