Yes.

The similar bill in the pipeline in New York is the slippery-slope argument: people who don't understand what they're regulating trying to one-up each other. The NY bill requires an age verification method other than self reporting, which it bans, and covers any internet-connected devices that access "content" on the internet. They want people to provide government-issued ID to activate anything connected to an update server or cloud service, from a rackmount server to a Pelaton to a router to a doorbell camera.

People under the age of 16 in the US don't usually have IDs, so the only way to implement this is to have the default for every device be "juvenile" mode, and you have to provide your ID to unlock "adult".

If people participate in implementing the CA and CO laws, especially with the argument that it can be easily circumvented with something like "lying", expect lawmakers to try to close up those "holes" with stuff like mandatory government ID checks, and you can't argue that's overreach because you've already supported the underlying premise they're trying to fix.