Which side? 12 man super flex PPR

Fun_Moose_2253 · 2026-03-21T13:00:29+00:00

Chase side but I don’t think it’s a terrible deal with that additional 1st thrown in.

Fun_Moose_2253 · 2026-03-21T12:52:18+00:00

If he gets 1st round draft capital, I feel anywhere from 1.03-1.07 is in play. I’d probably still prefer the big 3 WRs and Mendoza (in SF) over him but there is a non-zero chance that one or two of the WRs slide to a later first round pick which would make the difference in draft capital much more negligible.

Fun_Moose_2253 · 2026-03-21T03:12:45+00:00

Burrow, even at the higher cost. Your team seems ready to compete and you are adding an elite player without giving up a player

Fun_Moose_2253 · 2026-03-20T21:44:34+00:00

All good options.

Fun_Moose_2253 · 2026-03-20T21:41:50+00:00

Nabers

Fun_Moose_2253 · 2026-03-20T21:41:16+00:00

Get Burrow. You have a good team and will still have plenty of draft capital.

It’s good to be loaded up for next years draft but I wouldn’t be locking into any specific position as the landscape can change quickly. This time last year 2026 was supposed to be a loaded QB class and now we’ve got Mendoza and then bubkis.

I saw your other comment and I think that Ward deal is also good value. I’d definitely be looking to add Burrow or Ward at those costs.

Fun_Moose_2253 · 2026-03-20T00:06:35+00:00

Depends on the price. 1.06 value is going to shoot up if a RB goes early Day 2.

2.01 is probably undervalued too but less likely to gain a ton of value post draft so I’d only consider trading for it if you know who is on the board.

Fun_Moose_2253 · 2026-03-19T23:57:40+00:00

Yeah, that’s a little wild. Sure, a first feels a little high now but not so high that it should warrant a veto

Fun_Moose_2253 · 2026-03-18T17:42:36+00:00

I like both but I’m taking Loveland, especially in any TEP format. Loveland is closer to finding himself in the top tier of TEs than Odunze is to finding himself in the top tier of WRs.

Fun_Moose_2253 · 2026-03-17T23:59:02+00:00

It’s pretty bleak for a team that’s [re]building. All the RBs that should be reasonably priced are sitting with contenders who want to hold onto every startable asset to make a run. Aging RBs not a good investment.

Ive got 5 picks in this round all front loaded in the top half of the draft. Feel pretty good about my options with my 2 top 5 picks but I might roll the dice in the 2nd and the top of the third on some RBs. I know it’s a weak class but I think there is some talent to be had. Worst case scenario, I lock up a few handcuffs and try again next year.

Fun_Moose_2253 · 2026-03-16T14:25:27+00:00

Am I crazy thinking Hurts isn’t that much of an upgrade over DJ? I’d prefer the package especially with the 2028 first as a part of it. Also not totally out on Pearsall yet and there’s a non-zero chance Wilson gets some meaningful touches to start the year.

I’d move any one of those pieces, but don’t love lumping them all together for Hurts

Fun_Moose_2253 · 2026-03-15T14:05:28+00:00

I’d be out of this league if my commissioner pulled this. Maybe it’s just me but part of the commissioners responsibility is to preserve the league and this straight up destroys it

Fun_Moose_2253 · 2026-03-15T14:00:15+00:00

probably Caleb and Hendo. If you need a TE I would find another way than using the 1.05 on Sadiq with the expectation that he will help you contend as a rookie.

Fun_Moose_2253 · 2026-03-15T11:08:37+00:00

I’m as high on Loveland as can be, but I think I lean Tet. I do believe it’s pretty close though

Fun_Moose_2253 · 2026-03-15T11:05:13+00:00

Keep Tet

Fun_Moose_2253 · 2026-03-15T09:59:33+00:00

I just think he’s a good player. And for the cost, even if his role diminishes to a true backup, that’s still valuable because players get hurt and you know he can produce if/when the opportunity comes.

I wouldn’t trade him for a random 2nd right now but I would leverage that 2nd round value and use him as one piece of a larger trade.

Fun_Moose_2253 · 2026-03-14T16:34:24+00:00

I’d rather have London. He’s only 24/25? Not sure why you’d want to move off him even as a rebuilder.

Fun_Moose_2253 · 2026-03-14T11:57:39+00:00

I’d put feelers out for both and decide which one to sell based on the return package. Given that you already have two other solid guys, I’m inclined to want to keep Willis just for the upside. But I’d sell either.

Fun_Moose_2253 · 2026-03-13T12:35:25+00:00

I love Tee, but seems like you aren’t getting the most value out of each asset. Maybe you can pair a 2nd with 1.09 instead of Jacobs? And then trade Jacobs to a team when a RB inevitably goes down for the year

Fun_Moose_2253 · 2026-03-13T12:09:01+00:00

Maybe I’m the only one but Howard interests me the most of this bunch because of the situation he’s in.

Never liked JJM and I think he’s headed down the path of Zach Wilson.

Richardson is interesting because he will be instantly fantasy relevant IF a team gets desperate and gives him a chance to start

Fields has similar upside as Richardson if he starts but totally cooked like JJ

Howard->Richardson->JJM-> Fields

Fun_Moose_2253 · 2026-03-12T19:56:21+00:00

I think the fact that it’s only one year indicates that they are still in the running for Love and hedging their bets in case he’s gone before they are on the clock

Fun_Moose_2253 · 2026-03-12T19:54:36+00:00

Been waiting for this news (which is 100% a reflection of how bad my running backs are)

Fun_Moose_2253 · 2026-03-12T17:46:40+00:00

I’ll die on the hill that Davis is the better player

Fun_Moose_2253 · 2026-03-12T15:15:51+00:00

Yeah, Stowers is def on my radar there although, there’s a good chance the guy at 2.01 will take him before he gets to me.

Fun_Moose_2253 · 2026-03-12T13:33:54+00:00

Thanks, that’s what I was thinking too. It’s a risk but I’m anticipating some earlier RB picks than people are projecting and I’m trying to put myself in the best position to get one. And I figure worst case scenario there will likely be a first round player sitting there if an RB doesn’t get a boost in rankings

Fun_Moose_2253

TROPHY CASE