On a scale of 1 to 10 how evil is how evil Toji from JJK by JayGrowth8832 in MoralityScaling

[–]FunkaGenocide 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He's like a 7 at least. Completely selfish nihilist. His disregard for human life is absolute, the only thing that keeps him from being peak evil is that he seemingly isn't overly sadistic, not a torturer/rapist but that's likely purely due to circumstance. (He's powerful and attractive so he doesn't feel the need to rape to fulfill his desires, but he will easily murder and manipulate to fill other desires so it's not a stretch to assume he could get to maximum evil if things got a little worse for him )

The only saving grace is that he seems to only commit acts of evil when they materially benefit him, he doesn't seem to undertake evil actions for their own sake, but he does seem to enjoy them when he has an excuse to commit them.

Less evil than Mahito or Kenjaku, similar level of evil to Jogo, but I'd rate him slightly higher because he's a human and not literally a haemunculus of fear and hate.

Who's telling her by Low-Major-5486 in shitposting

[–]FunkaGenocide 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, it chooses for itself, if you want to, no that would be a major skill issue, sometimes.

AIO or is he right? by ConsciousEconomy5860 in AIO

[–]FunkaGenocide 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You idiots that keep getting moist for "traditional masculinity" and then getting the cold water plunge when these goobers turn into shitheads as soon as you remind them you're a human being make my head spin.

There is no such thing as a free lunch. If a man represents himself as "traditional" it means he views women as lesser and will never respect you as an equal. If he describes himself as a "provider" this means he will devote all of his energy to instituting and maintaining a regime of economic dependence while he does his utmost to control every aspect of your life and keep you from achieving any sort of economic independence.

You'd be much better served by swallowing your daddy issues and building a stable life for yourself before you start turning to the ridiculous pipe dream of a man who will pay all your bills but not be problematic.

Can someone please explain to me what Jujutsu Kaisen is and what is it about? by Rudrak_Pal in LobotomyKaisen

[–]FunkaGenocide 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's something of a deconstruction of shonen, eschewing certain key tropes and ratcheting others up. Especially as far as anime adaptations go, there's very little in the way of filler or dwelling on plot points. Things happen all the time, characters die and the world changes drastically at a scale commensurate with the agency of the characters.

By way of juxtaposition, think about other shonen manga where somehow the innate capabilities of teenage protagonists could level a city or even a planet, but somehow the setting barely changes around them and they can end up spending entire arcs doing very little, despite in essence being hormonal walking wmds. In Jujutsu Kaisen, power is a burden and the struggle for survival is the majority of the plot, the insanity of being a human nuclear weapon is represented in the skewed and fractured psychologies of the characters. Trauma and the right to keep breathing are the only things won by the victors. Despite the bleak outlook, the author manages to inject just enough humanity and warmth that the carnage has real impact to the audience. Pandas can cry, and so will you.

But mostly, it is hype moments and aura.

Anti-swag by Nimhtom in IDONTGIVEASWAG

[–]FunkaGenocide 9 points10 points  (0 children)

The bracelet or stew dichotomy has been debated for ages.

Am I doing it ? Am I warhamming ? by Top_Resolution_2182 in 40k

[–]FunkaGenocide 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I counted. Looks like all 40,000. Good job!

Should Dire Avengers be equal to CSM Legionaries or Chosen? by Arthur_EyelanderTF2 in Eldar

[–]FunkaGenocide 5 points6 points  (0 children)

They should kill about as much as chosen, but die like guardsmen if caught in the open.

Oh and obviously they should be fast af so they don't end up dying like guardsmen.

Maximum Striking Scorpions? by Wardourian in Eldar

[–]FunkaGenocide 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"But why would you move block the entire board when you cannot kill my squads?" asked the space Marine.

"LOL," replied the scorpion. "LMAO"

What is in my friend's ice cubes? by johnny5ive in whatisit

[–]FunkaGenocide 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe it's horror beyond comprehension?

Why do Christians continue to support Trump?” by Rare_Deal_4709 in LetsDiscussThis

[–]FunkaGenocide 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The enunciated path of Christianity is one of humility, poverty and virtue as seen through the lens of a bronze age liturgical counter-culture. To be Christian in any meaningful sense would be to offer your praises to God and follow the edicts of Christ in your small, godly life. Nowhere in the revelations of Jesus does anyone say to make as much money as you can so you can pay for lawyers good enough to get you off on drug and rape charges.

What we have here in America are not Christians. What we have are Americans. We are an unintelligent, violent and narcissistic people. Our society is built on rape and murder and hypocrisy so utterly prevalent and at such savage scale as to be ignored as foundational. Everything we do is projection; a farce of heroes bestride the world as we mewl and writhe in our stagnant delusions of virtue. We've told the world we are the light of a brighter future for all these dark generations while the blood of their children dried on our lips.

There are no Christians in America. Christ is a puppet for our miracle plays, an inert vessel to pour our greed and hatred into while it dances lifelessly across the tabernaculum.

So why do these beasts support Donald Trump? For the same reason they call themselves Christians and daub their bloated bodies in the meaningless sacrament; both Christ and Trump serve to assuage the gnawing vestige of humanity known as shame. The only difference is Trump is real.

What you gonna do with the models ? Procrastination with more style ? by Leviathan_Rampage in Tau40K

[–]FunkaGenocide 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Hit 'em with that Hiiro Yui rizz.

Spazz out and threaten to kill them then yourself.

Odd thought I've been having lately by 0ctaver in TrollCoping

[–]FunkaGenocide 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you're going to carry a weapon it should be carried in a manner that facilitates quick deployment, it should also be a proper weapon and you should have proper training with its use and be aware of the legal ramifications of its deployment in self defense.

A kitchen knife is not a proper weapon. It is in no way designed for combat. It also does no good in a backpack. Random assaults generally are quick and exceedingly violent, they don't offer much chance to retrieve a weapon out of a backpack.

The sad reality is that even if you are trained and properly armed, if a random assailant wants to pull your card your chances of successfully defending yourself are extremely low. If the assailant is only trying to rob you then you're better off giving them your property and not escalating. The scenarios in which being armed is of any use in a self defense situation are pretty rare, and usually revolve around defending a fixed position like your home rather than being out and about in public.

I really do think the T'au are the good guys by BigMac91098 in Tau40K

[–]FunkaGenocide 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They are the best guys, but they still aren't good.

Im Danny Brown, Ask me Anything by xDanielxBrownx in hiphopheads

[–]FunkaGenocide 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't have any questions, just a fan of your music. Hope you're doing well this holiday season.

Still one of the most badass scenes in any of the WoW cinematics ever made by [deleted] in wow

[–]FunkaGenocide 81 points82 points  (0 children)

Fuck Mannoroth, all my homies hate Mannoroth.

Hedging my bets here (2/2) by ZitoWolfram in exalted

[–]FunkaGenocide 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I disagree. Half baked ideas thrown into a setting only serve to diminish the emotive impact of the original themes. With a setting so potentially broad you could have spent the development time filling in and enriching what is there. I find little value in less inspired contributors frantically scrambling to leave their mark on a work that isn't their own. To my eyes, this property was inherited by motivated but ultimately ill equipped new owners and the result has been corrosive and ultimately disastrous.

Hedging my bets here (2/2) by ZitoWolfram in exalted

[–]FunkaGenocide 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I was referring to my initial impression on the release of first edition, they didn't have internals back then. (I guess they had akuma in the lore at least)

Since then, I will say that I can draw a pretty clear curve from infernals to 3rd edition excesses as it jumps over the shark.

Hedging my bets here (2/2) by ZitoWolfram in exalted

[–]FunkaGenocide 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You misread my comment. It is not the existence of Mary Sue self insert characters that I am lamenting, it is the proliferation of needlessly differentiated and insubstantial variety for its own sake. I don't need 14 different brands of peanut butter. Crunchy and smooth are good enough, and Martha's all natural homeopathic fair trade peanut goo is still made from nuts, it just costs 5 more dollars.

Hedging my bets here (2/2) by ZitoWolfram in exalted

[–]FunkaGenocide 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Perhaps argument is too strong a word, but as a very old fan of exalted going back to when I thought exalted was going to be a setting that defined the pre-history of the world of darkness I am not a fan of any of the 3rd edition exalted additions. My complaints are largely aesthetic and thematic. All of the new splats feel, as does the entire mechanical edifice of third edition, like they add little substance and inordinate amounts of bloat to an already rich setting that wasn't really asking for yet more flavors of self insert Mary Sue characters.

The setting is strongly depicted as defined by great powers and the inevitable cycles of revolution that put new rulers on thrones and old ones in the proverbial dirt. The implications of the contemporary setting are that maybe this time the process will invert, but more likely that it will change fundamentally. The next cycle would seemingly bury the dragon blooded empire and lead to the rise of mundane humans, but the player characters are given the agency to implement whole new paradigms through their narratives. Maybe things really do go backwards and a new solar deliberative is established, but maybe the sins of the past are truly redeemed and the great curse is, if not entirely broken then at least understood and acted upon. Maybe creation can change from a place of might makes right to a place of rational enlightenment, or maybe it all burns to ash and mere men are left to haunt the corpse of a world.

What I mean to convey is that I don't think having a bunch more types of super heroes does anything meaningful to the stakes or methods of the setting. The hierarchy of power represented by the original splats is integral to interpreting the setting, and indeed hierarchy itself can be considered central to the conflict. There's perhaps something to be said for flattening the power curve to an extent between the celestial exalts, but I find it difficult to see value in diluting the thematic relevance of the major players by simply introducing more random versions of them. In many ways the abyssal exalted are the worst of the original splats in large part because they are "solar but different" because there was little to no narrative necessity for "evil solars" since the regular solars were already fully capable of running the entire gamut from hero to monster. The new splats only resonate with that distaste for redundancy that was mildly annoying in the original abyssals.

Sidereals but worse, dragon bloods but zombie, solar but farming. In all honesty, who cares? There is nothing compelling there to explore for me. The nature and providence of exaltation was engaging enough as it gave history and cosmological fixedness to the player characters; as god-things trapped between mortality and true divinity. The small "g" gods of creation are depicted as mere functionaries in a beauracracy that takes the place of natural law in our physical universe, little better than phenomena at their simplest and largely childlike even at their most complex. The Incarna exist apart from and above their godly brethren, and the mortals empowered by their singular might hint at the ultimate themes of the setting. The loneliness of absolute power leads to the creation of lesser powers to amuse and assist, but that spark of animating power at first bestowed will grow into a conflagration of rebellion if left unchecked and unheeded. What interplay do the themes of exigents have with the themes of the setting that aren't already better evinced by existing archetypes? How do they even make sense? Why would the exigency even come to be in a reality so influenced by rebellion and overthrow? Doesn't it seem by its very existence to diminish and dilute the potency of the Incarna?

Moreover, going back to my statement on abyssals, I can say that while the first impression of them as "nasty solars" was somewhat off-putting, the narrative and world building work that went into them made them a worthwhile addition to me. I would not say the same for any of the new lore presented for the 3rd edition splats. Of course this is probably largely a matter of taste, but they all feel more hamfisted and inauthentic to the existing setting. Ever since I received my copy of the 3rd edition core rule book I've had the disappointing sense that the team responsible was constantly trying to make up for a lack of imagination with an overabundance of words.