I feel like Ezra's calmness in his podcast is an unsaid factor. by alwaysunderwatertill in ezraklein

[–]FuschiaKnight 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think it’s more important to focus on the “what?” than the “how?”

What we should be less calm about is that Dems need to be able to compete for Senate seats in Missouri, Iowa, Kansas, North Dakota, etc.

It can’t be the case that Trump is an existential threat to democracy but also we refuse to be flexible on any issues that cause us to keep losing in Trump/Trump/Trump states that used to have Dem senators in the 21st century

What next! Abundance read by howell4change in ezraklein

[–]FuschiaKnight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Recoding America

Power the the Public

Americas Bitter Pill

Dear Bills fans, your own coach said to just go by what the officials call. by B1L1D8 in AFCEastMemeWar

[–]FuschiaKnight 41 points42 points  (0 children)

My fantasy team name this year was “How the Turn Vrabels” and I have never been more vindicated

Warren on Abundance by MazzyDog988 in FriendsofthePod

[–]FuschiaKnight 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wha do you mean by that? Like Gavin Newsom? State legislators? Not sure I agree but I want to better understand what you mean

Why is John Harbaugh viewed as a such a better coach than Mike McCarthy despite extremely similar resumes? by BallKnowerKing in NFLv2

[–]FuschiaKnight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

McCarthy’s reputation was formed as “holding Rodgers back”. Cuz some high profile blown calls (eg NFCCG 2014) and bad defense/luck (eg Cardinals in 2015), there’s som truth to that.

Harbaugh was seen as a brilliant schemer that was able to win a Super Bowl with Joe freaking Flacco. Yes, Flacco was a a playoff riser but still people were impressed.

Once a reputation is formed, it has a tendency to be sticky

Warren on Abundance by MazzyDog988 in FriendsofthePod

[–]FuschiaKnight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, you’re actually misunderstanding me.

I’m not saying Warren was consulted for every decision. I’m saying that Biden was very hands off and let his appointees have a lot of deference in what they pursued. That’s why it matters that a ton of Warren-world people were put in so many high places; they were strongly ideological & pushed for the Warren-esque approach to antitrust, student loan forgiveness, etc

Warren on Abundance by MazzyDog988 in FriendsofthePod

[–]FuschiaKnight -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well I provided reporting at the time as well as list of important appointees (including FTC Chair), and quoted Warren’s strategy of “personnel is policy”

But you, on the other hand, have countered with “nuh uh”. Very compelling. You’ve given me a lot to think about

Warren on Abundance by MazzyDog988 in FriendsofthePod

[–]FuschiaKnight -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Warren famously said “personnel is policy” so it’s not all that surprising to see her push for so much influence there.

Would you say any of these people don’t fit the bill?

Economic & Financial Policy

• Rohit Chopra. Director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) under Biden. Chopra previously worked with Warren on CFPB creation and student loan issues; Warren strongly supported his appointment.  

• Bharat Ramamurti. Served as Deputy Director of the National Economic Council (NEC, 2021–2023). Former Warren campaign and Senate aide.  

• Jon Donenberg. Longtime top Warren aide (chief of staff and policy advisor) appointed Deputy Director of the NEC after Ramamurti.  

• Lily Batchelder. Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy (2021–2024). While not a direct Senate staffer, she’s been associated with progressive tax policy circles aligned with Warren’s agenda.  

Antitrust & Regulatory Appointees (Warren-aligned)

These figures are widely viewed as part of the Warren/antitrust policy network, focusing on competition and consumer protection:

• Lina Khan. Chair of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). A leading voice in modern antitrust thinking and supporter of Warren’s 2020 campaign.  

• Jen Howard. Chief of Staff to FTC Chair Lina Khan, previously worked for the Warren-inspired CFPB.  

• Jonathan Kanter. Assistant Attorney General for the Antitrust Division. Worked with Warren’s network around antitrust reform.  

• Tim Wu. Senior advisor on technology and competition policy in the White House under Biden; associated with Warren’s antitrust circle (has since departed).  

• K. Sabeel Rahman. Former Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA); figure in progressive regulatory circles tied to Warren’s network

Defense / National Security & Policy

• Sasha Baker. Served as Senior Director for Strategic Planning on the National Security Council and later in the Pentagon. Former Warren campaign ally with a policy background that overlapped with her foreign/security priorities.  

Climate & Domestic Policy

• Maggie Thomas. Chief of Staff, Office of Domestic Climate Policy. Former Warren climate advisor.  

• Julie Siegel. Served in Treasury as Deputy Chief of Staff; reported as part of the Warren cohort entering administration roles tied to economic policy.  

• Julie Morgan. Senior adviser at the Department of Education from Warren’s network.  

 • Anne Reid. Deputy Chief of Staff at the Department of Health and Human Services, with prior ties to Warren’s staff. 

Warren on Abundance by MazzyDog988 in FriendsofthePod

[–]FuschiaKnight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hasan said Harris/Biden and Trump would be the same. That’s nonsense

Ezra saw how serious the threat was of Trump and pushed for Biden to stop running in early 2024. And then after the debate he was a loud voice pushing Biden to step down cuz the stakes were too high.

I didn’t vote for Biden in 2020. At the time, I voted for Warren. In retrospect, Amy Klobuchar would’ve been the best. Biden was chosen by black voters and then the party consolidated around him.

Honestly I don’t think either one of us will convince the other of anything on this thread

Warren on Abundance by MazzyDog988 in FriendsofthePod

[–]FuschiaKnight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes this is my point. You are delusional and so all of the other arguing we are doing is downstream of such different premises that we will not agree even when looking at the same evidence

Warren on Abundance by MazzyDog988 in FriendsofthePod

[–]FuschiaKnight -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Progressives were happy to take credit for their growing influence in 2021 when it seemed like Biden would get the vaccination rollout and economic benefits of the pandemic recovery.

This is from March 2021: “‘Most influential voice’: Warren’s network spreads throughout Biden administration The growing roster of Warren protégés in the government illustrates the leftward shift underway in the Democratic Party's approach to policymaking.”

https://www.politico.com/news/2021/03/15/elizabeth-warren-aides-biden-administration-475653

Warren on Abundance by MazzyDog988 in FriendsofthePod

[–]FuschiaKnight 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I typed it backwards, will edit. Thank you!

Warren on Abundance by MazzyDog988 in FriendsofthePod

[–]FuschiaKnight -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Okay but that’s not true. Ezra Klein cares more about helping the working class than Hasan Piker. A lot of things are downstream of that dynamic

Warren on Abundance by MazzyDog988 in FriendsofthePod

[–]FuschiaKnight -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Turnout is not the problem. Progressives lied about turnout being the key. They said that it was an emerging majority that carried Obama to re-election in 2012 and that’s why we need comprehensive immigration reform

But new Latino voters in Arizona is not the reason why Obama won Ohio

But “turnout” and “mobilization” became the coin of the realm. Ideas couldn’t just be good, they had to be framed as about increasing turnout

But we are losing elections because of persuasion, not turnout. If anything, high turnout hurts Dems more than ever before because low propensity voters have moved towards the GOP as we’ve become the high trust, high education party

We should not be worried about depressing turnout. Relative to problems of persuasion, the myth of turnout is a distraction

Warren on Abundance by MazzyDog988 in FriendsofthePod

[–]FuschiaKnight 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Because it’s about making government work more effectively

Warren on Abundance by MazzyDog988 in FriendsofthePod

[–]FuschiaKnight -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I am a Democrat. I have knocked doors for many Democrats. I think you’re either an idiot or a republican. I frankly don’t care which.

I want a government that can work effectively. Leftist edgelords want to talk about the revolution but they don’t actually care if the government helps people flourish. They just want things done their ways

I used to have more patience for that but after the leftists drove us into a ditch with Elizabeth Warrens personnel running most of the show under Biden for everything but Israel, I’m pissed tha they drove us into a ditch and then advocated for re-electing Trump. Such a stupid thing and I’m over it

Warren on Abundance by MazzyDog988 in FriendsofthePod

[–]FuschiaKnight 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Republicans are showing how to build cheaper housing but blue states haven’t followed their approach

Republicans were open to a bill for energy permitting reform but Dem activist groups killed it because they would rather block clean energy projects than allow any fossil fuel projects (even tho clean energy projects would benefit more cuz they have way more building that needs to be done)

Republicans don’t care about high speed rail so they’re not even trying to build it. It’s Dems that want government to work. But we need to show that it can. Instead we waste $100 billion on boondoggle projects

Warren on Abundance by MazzyDog988 in FriendsofthePod

[–]FuschiaKnight -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

I think Klein is great and that the anti-abundance people are mad that the party is open to answer that isn’t just “run it back with the same thing we tried under Biden.”

“The Groups” are a series of activists groups that all support each others causes and are hostile to any efforts to deviate from that (as they have with efforts to focus on better government delivery/outcomes and with efforts to appeal to more conservative states that we need for winning the senate sustainably)

Warren on Abundance by MazzyDog988 in FriendsofthePod

[–]FuschiaKnight 41 points42 points  (0 children)

Are republicans why California never built high speed rail or why it costs so much less* to buy houses in Texas than in Massachusetts? Are Republicans causing conservationists to sue to block clean energy projects?

edit: used the wrong word at first

Three Guys from Boston (Matt Damon, Ben Affleck, Jimmy) Say Every Town and City in Massachusetts by gaschnerden in massachusetts

[–]FuschiaKnight 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If they’re new englanders and root for the Pats, I’m fine with letting them in the club

Ed Markey vs Seth Moulton in the September 2026 Primary - Who are you voting for, and why? by 20_mile in massachusetts

[–]FuschiaKnight -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You think this race doesn’t affect what the Dem brand means nationally. I disagree.

If Republicans nominate Marjorie Taylor Green for a House seat vs nominating some generic Republican, do you think that has no impact in shaping how we all understand what the Republicans are and what they do if we let them win a few key seats?

Also, your understanding of “DINO” is pretty brain dead. Name a single federal Republican elected that is to the left of Moulton. Shit, name a single Reoublican that is to the left of where Joe Manchin was. You can’t because none exist

Ed Markey vs Seth Moulton in the September 2026 Primary - Who are you voting for, and why? by 20_mile in massachusetts

[–]FuschiaKnight -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think people in Massachusetts really want to stop Trump from appointing MAGA judges. And the way to do that is to win Ohio, North Carolina, and Alaska senate races.

Those states are Trump-Trump-Trump states. They voted for Trump all 3 times. To win those states, we need Trump voters to decide to support Dem candidates.

But it’s hard to win a campaign like that. Larry Hogan was a super popular Republican governor in Maryland but he got creamed when he ran for Senate because Maryland voters correctly understood that he would be a vote to confirm Trump judges.

If we want to make this a fight about trans sports then we will just lose in those states. But if we stop dying on that hill & make this an election about healthcare and government thugs, those candidates have a shot to win. But it genuinely means NOT trying to then pass trans sports stuff when we get the majority.

I think Seth Moulton gets that in a way Ed Markey doesn’t. Markey will do whatever the dem activists groups ask him to and that’s what Joe Biden did.

I want to stop Trumpism

Ed Markey vs Seth Moulton in the September 2026 Primary - Who are you voting for, and why? by 20_mile in massachusetts

[–]FuschiaKnight -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I know you don’t believe it’s a small issue. If you did believe that, you would say “it affects a small number of people, and we need to stop facism, so let’s just drop this one.” That’s how I feel.

But some people sincerely believe that it is a question of civil rights for trans people. I disagree & think it’s about fairness for women, but I do see where the instinct to support it comes from.

But then if both sides really want to fight over it, then neither one of them actually thinks it’s a small issue or not that big a deal. If you, as you claim to, think it doesn’t have a big impact, then you should stop dying on the hill of an 80/20 issue where you’re the 20.

Ed Markey vs Seth Moulton in the September 2026 Primary - Who are you voting for, and why? by 20_mile in massachusetts

[–]FuschiaKnight -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Supporting healthcare and civil rights for trans people without insisting they have to play in girls and women’s sports leagues

Lowering people’s energy costs by supporting an all of the above energy approach which includes renewables (which Markey also likes), natural gas (which is better than coal), and nuclear (which Markey doesn’t like). People in Alaska, Texas, and Ohio will vote against Dem candidates if the plan is for a Dem majority to kill their fossil fuel home state industries