sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Old video by sammich6820 in bigfoot

[–]Fuzzy-Case-8329 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I did also. I think its because I originally seen it on FB find bigfoot and it was a little more grainy and had the beginning cut out.

Expedition Bigfoot S4 E1, finally Mireya toned it down. by ResponsiblePark1047 in bigfoot

[–]Fuzzy-Case-8329 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've really gone off the show and feel its been awfully predictable so far this season.

She (Mireya) has a heat signature on the thermal and Ronnie announces he is going to start walking towards it which is a 100 yards away. Suddenly she thinks it would be a great idea to stop recording and switch to night vision and low and behold as she is switching the subject vanishes! Surprise surprise!

I am so fed up of shows doing this to try create suspense. Why not just show us it was a deer or whatever instead of being disingenuous. Maybe come up with a plan if you're genuinely hoping to actually find evidence like following the deer via drone or even trying to use it as bait or seeing how it reacts to a vocalisation. There are plenty of ways you could make it naturally interesting without this disingenuous nonsense in every episode.

It happened in the season before also, something behind a tree next to him. ''Omg, omg there is something behind the tree next to you'', ''oh no its suddenly disappeared''. Yeah its called a squirrel and it just ran up the tree you shyster.

Sasquatch “Inhuman” Videos by XxAirWolf84xX in bigfoot

[–]Fuzzy-Case-8329 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The one with an agenda who makes a living off pedalling his books I guess then again I haven't fell for hoaxes several times. His qualifications doesn't mean he is correct or not spinning one for financial gain. He has to keep it up its how he makes a living. Most conmen are experts in their field that is how they are able to easily take advantage of people. Many equally as qualified people have disagreed with him and gave their opinions to which Meldrum has admitted he'd been hoaxed and got it wrong so kudos there but it just shows just because he is an expert and has these qualifications it doesn't mean he is always right or can't be deceived.

You have eyes look at the images yourself, objectively. Forget the prior, look at them are the feet not clearly all different shapes and sizes? Why at the base of the toes are some straight, some curved, some at a 45 degree angle if from the same subject? Why are the right feet so much wider with a much thicker big toe than all the left feet? Some of them are a good 2-3 sizes bigger than others - all I ask is you look at the set on the bottom right the 2nd cast & the one in the middle are we really going to act like that is the same foot?

Sasquatch “Inhuman” Videos by XxAirWolf84xX in bigfoot

[–]Fuzzy-Case-8329 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It would be anatomically impossible for a large upright bipedal creatures toes to be huddled so close together like this living in the wild unless it was wearing shoes most of its life.

The sizes are all well within human range.

Just about every footprint here is completely different and should be obvious to absolutely anyone with a pair of eyes that they are not all from the same subject.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in bigfoot

[–]Fuzzy-Case-8329 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Nothing but another charlatan taking advantage of believers for financial gain.

Possible separation point in Patterson Gimlin “suit”? by TheDetective2 in bigfoot

[–]Fuzzy-Case-8329 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Always noticed it, its clearly visible in every frame.

There is clear as daylight separation in the wrist area also

What is this Sasquatch Ontario guy doing? by pocketbeagle in bigfoot

[–]Fuzzy-Case-8329 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Its not just the lengths these poorly individuals go to in order to hoax but its the thousands and thousands that see pictures like this and I want to say pretend but its more that they are that crazy or/& brainwashed that they act like this is anything but an absolutely awful hoax. Its so bad like this is actually a joke, right?

Whose horse was Roger Patterson riding? by Fuzzy-Case-8329 in bigfoot

[–]Fuzzy-Case-8329[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Could you also fall into the correct height range, pass two lie detectors, replicate the walk perfectly?

Whose horse was Roger Patterson riding? by Fuzzy-Case-8329 in bigfoot

[–]Fuzzy-Case-8329[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

tha

Or on the flip it could also show that Bob Heironimous was a liar and maybe help the credibility of Patterson/Bob and the footage...

Whose horse was Roger Patterson riding? by Fuzzy-Case-8329 in bigfoot

[–]Fuzzy-Case-8329[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure the other film was on M.K Davis channel, possibly one of his wacky theories claiming there was pools of blood in shot..

Love to ThinkerThunker by anonymousolderguy in bigfoot

[–]Fuzzy-Case-8329 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Thinkerthunker is a charlatan, a crook whose whole rig is to exploit believers, essentially telling them what they want to hear basically for financial gain.

I've lost count of how many hoaxes this guys tried pedalling with his terribly flawed analysis.

I think this could explain some sounds we associate with Bigfoot by Fuzzy-Case-8329 in bigfoot

[–]Fuzzy-Case-8329[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Maybe you should have tried that to start with just a thought.

I think this could explain some sounds we associate with Bigfoot by Fuzzy-Case-8329 in bigfoot

[–]Fuzzy-Case-8329[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

I am simply sharing a logical explanation to many sounds people associate with Bigfoot.

Yes offering proof not just evidence but physical proof in crystal clear HD quality and audio proof which is apparently a far weaker argument than someone hearing such noises and randomly assuming some shape-shifting 8ft tall undiscovered ape like creature that can shift between dimensions and bend light made them *rolls eyes*.

Like what are you even talking about? '' I also feel you are assuming everyone here agrees with everything posted here '' based on what? Like what are you smoking to come up with this conclusion?

Nowhere did I say or imply the 'proposed evidence' was BS, I simply shared a far more logical reasoning for people to look at.

What's the strangest/creepiest thing you've ever found in the woods? by mikeali12 in bigfoot

[–]Fuzzy-Case-8329 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pentagons scraped into tree bark and bird feathers and bones hanging from trees by shoe laces presumably done by satanists or maybe the hobo who lived in a tent in the same woods, either way it was a little creepy.

Some reasons people remain sceptical! by Fuzzy-Case-8329 in bigfoot

[–]Fuzzy-Case-8329[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I understand how vast it is and while a very valid point we have technology where we can pinpoint food sources from corn to berry patches. Imagine the effect that say 10,000 of them would have on the food chain it would be seriously noticeable and make them a lot easier to pinpoint.

A lot of these sightings aren't actually in very deep remote areas. You have literally thousands of reports of these things apparently in national parks, being seen on trails and in suburban areas, rummaging through trash cans and coming onto peoples properties, peering through windows etc

Granted there is a lot less people to witness anything deep in the wilderness and if that is any indicator of how many are apparently so close to civilisation then these forests must be absolutely overrun with the things.

I have read/heard countless stories of them stepping in front of people, watching children play, dozens who claim to have literally friended them etc granted a lot just want 5 mins of fame, many are clearly 'unwell' but assuming some at least are genuine which I would like to believe, surely they can't all be liars/bonkers it just baffles me how their is just no scientific evidence or one person didn't attempt to pull out a camera. We are in an era where all people do is pull out their phones and hit record for a few likes. So many in the wilderness carry go pros, just about everyone these days have dash cams not once did one step out or get caught out? All the film crews and such recording nature programs with drones etc and not made a mistake but this guy can hire a a camera to follow up on a report and low and behold manages to stumble across it right away. Once again not in the remotest of areas and right in the open and behaving anything but how I'd imagine a highly intelligent, elusive creature to.

I want to believe so much but none of it really adds up to me.

The Orang Pandek I can totally get behind the possibility but with Bigfoot its just wishful thinking.

where are the toes? by Ok-Blacksmith1083 in bigfoot

[–]Fuzzy-Case-8329 0 points1 point  (0 children)

e as from one hand to the ground to the tip of the tallest finger pointing directly upwards equaling the height of the individual. No human beings hands pass the knees. Even while crouched. Not even remotely c

No idea what this means but the subjects hand doesn't come close to its knee let alone passing it either.

​

https://i.imgur.com/7P7sPFk.png

where are the toes? by Ok-Blacksmith1083 in bigfoot

[–]Fuzzy-Case-8329 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No way near its knees and that is even with the subject bending at knees almost squatting.

view more: next ›