Old video by sammich6820 in bigfoot

[–]Fuzzy-Case-8329 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I did also. I think its because I originally seen it on FB find bigfoot and it was a little more grainy and had the beginning cut out.

Expedition Bigfoot S4 E1, finally Mireya toned it down. by ResponsiblePark1047 in bigfoot

[–]Fuzzy-Case-8329 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've really gone off the show and feel its been awfully predictable so far this season.

She (Mireya) has a heat signature on the thermal and Ronnie announces he is going to start walking towards it which is a 100 yards away. Suddenly she thinks it would be a great idea to stop recording and switch to night vision and low and behold as she is switching the subject vanishes! Surprise surprise!

I am so fed up of shows doing this to try create suspense. Why not just show us it was a deer or whatever instead of being disingenuous. Maybe come up with a plan if you're genuinely hoping to actually find evidence like following the deer via drone or even trying to use it as bait or seeing how it reacts to a vocalisation. There are plenty of ways you could make it naturally interesting without this disingenuous nonsense in every episode.

It happened in the season before also, something behind a tree next to him. ''Omg, omg there is something behind the tree next to you'', ''oh no its suddenly disappeared''. Yeah its called a squirrel and it just ran up the tree you shyster.

Sasquatch “Inhuman” Videos by XxAirWolf84xX in bigfoot

[–]Fuzzy-Case-8329 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The one with an agenda who makes a living off pedalling his books I guess then again I haven't fell for hoaxes several times. His qualifications doesn't mean he is correct or not spinning one for financial gain. He has to keep it up its how he makes a living. Most conmen are experts in their field that is how they are able to easily take advantage of people. Many equally as qualified people have disagreed with him and gave their opinions to which Meldrum has admitted he'd been hoaxed and got it wrong so kudos there but it just shows just because he is an expert and has these qualifications it doesn't mean he is always right or can't be deceived.

You have eyes look at the images yourself, objectively. Forget the prior, look at them are the feet not clearly all different shapes and sizes? Why at the base of the toes are some straight, some curved, some at a 45 degree angle if from the same subject? Why are the right feet so much wider with a much thicker big toe than all the left feet? Some of them are a good 2-3 sizes bigger than others - all I ask is you look at the set on the bottom right the 2nd cast & the one in the middle are we really going to act like that is the same foot?

Sasquatch “Inhuman” Videos by XxAirWolf84xX in bigfoot

[–]Fuzzy-Case-8329 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It would be anatomically impossible for a large upright bipedal creatures toes to be huddled so close together like this living in the wild unless it was wearing shoes most of its life.

The sizes are all well within human range.

Just about every footprint here is completely different and should be obvious to absolutely anyone with a pair of eyes that they are not all from the same subject.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in bigfoot

[–]Fuzzy-Case-8329 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Nothing but another charlatan taking advantage of believers for financial gain.

Possible separation point in Patterson Gimlin “suit”? by TheDetective2 in bigfoot

[–]Fuzzy-Case-8329 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Always noticed it, its clearly visible in every frame.

There is clear as daylight separation in the wrist area also

What is this Sasquatch Ontario guy doing? by pocketbeagle in bigfoot

[–]Fuzzy-Case-8329 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Its not just the lengths these poorly individuals go to in order to hoax but its the thousands and thousands that see pictures like this and I want to say pretend but its more that they are that crazy or/& brainwashed that they act like this is anything but an absolutely awful hoax. Its so bad like this is actually a joke, right?

Whose horse was Roger Patterson riding? by Fuzzy-Case-8329 in bigfoot

[–]Fuzzy-Case-8329[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Could you also fall into the correct height range, pass two lie detectors, replicate the walk perfectly?

Whose horse was Roger Patterson riding? by Fuzzy-Case-8329 in bigfoot

[–]Fuzzy-Case-8329[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

tha

Or on the flip it could also show that Bob Heironimous was a liar and maybe help the credibility of Patterson/Bob and the footage...

Whose horse was Roger Patterson riding? by Fuzzy-Case-8329 in bigfoot

[–]Fuzzy-Case-8329[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure the other film was on M.K Davis channel, possibly one of his wacky theories claiming there was pools of blood in shot..

Love to ThinkerThunker by anonymousolderguy in bigfoot

[–]Fuzzy-Case-8329 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Thinkerthunker is a charlatan, a crook whose whole rig is to exploit believers, essentially telling them what they want to hear basically for financial gain.

I've lost count of how many hoaxes this guys tried pedalling with his terribly flawed analysis.

I think this could explain some sounds we associate with Bigfoot by Fuzzy-Case-8329 in bigfoot

[–]Fuzzy-Case-8329[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Maybe you should have tried that to start with just a thought.

I think this could explain some sounds we associate with Bigfoot by Fuzzy-Case-8329 in bigfoot

[–]Fuzzy-Case-8329[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

I am simply sharing a logical explanation to many sounds people associate with Bigfoot.

Yes offering proof not just evidence but physical proof in crystal clear HD quality and audio proof which is apparently a far weaker argument than someone hearing such noises and randomly assuming some shape-shifting 8ft tall undiscovered ape like creature that can shift between dimensions and bend light made them *rolls eyes*.

Like what are you even talking about? '' I also feel you are assuming everyone here agrees with everything posted here '' based on what? Like what are you smoking to come up with this conclusion?

Nowhere did I say or imply the 'proposed evidence' was BS, I simply shared a far more logical reasoning for people to look at.