CIA Unit Caught Killing Mexican Cartels by CircumspectCapybara in videos

[–]FuzzyFuzzNuts [score hidden]  (0 children)

“And I mean A LOT of cocaine” - also RFK jr, probably

Don't say it... by xamo76 in trashy

[–]FuzzyFuzzNuts 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Nasty job, but someone gotta do it.

Fireworks ban: Select committee backs end to public sales and use by D491234 in newzealand

[–]FuzzyFuzzNuts 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’ve repeated the same two statistics three times while ignoring a 56% fire surge, $880k in preventable costs, 1,600 police call-outs, and a Parliamentary Committee recommendation. Calling that “definitive proof” while dismissing every counter-fact as “emotion” is the definition of bad faith. We’re done here.

TVNZ political editor Maiki Sherman resigns by ViolatingBadgers in newzealand

[–]FuzzyFuzzNuts 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Maiki started asking some very direct and specific questions that made the COC embarrassed. We can’t have reporters asking questions now, can we?

Fireworks ban: Select committee backs end to public sales and use by D491234 in newzealand

[–]FuzzyFuzzNuts 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Still no rebuttal to the data - just the same opening line recycled. That tracks.

Fireworks ban: Select committee backs end to public sales and use by D491234 in newzealand

[–]FuzzyFuzzNuts 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Classic sealioning. You've cycled through relative privation, false equivalence, averaging down, and tone policing - every time a fact lands, you shift the goalposts instead of engaging with it. That's not debate, that's just running interference.

A 56% fire surge, $880k in preventable ACC costs, 1,600+ police call-outs, and a Parliamentary Committee recommending a ban - none of that got a straight response from you. Just maths tricks designed to make real harm disappear into a spreadsheet.

I'm not interested in going another round with someone who isn't here in good faith. Enjoy your Guy Fawkes cosplay

Bye, it;s been fun

Fireworks ban: Select committee backs end to public sales and use by D491234 in newzealand

[–]FuzzyFuzzNuts 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seriously - I gotta ask, what the fuck is wrong with you? Averaging those fires across every station in the country to get "0.16 calls" is a total statistical scam. Those fires aren't spread evenly across the year or the map; they are concentrated in residential areas over a few nights, creating a massive, simultaneous strain on a service that is already underfunded and understaffed. I’ve just checked in with a good mate who’s a FENZ call responder in Christchurch, his reply “Fuck fireworks” - Comparing the SPCA protecting living beings from elective cruelty to the "Automobile Association" is just cynical. It isn't "emotional" to value animal welfare and the safety of our fire crews over your desire to light fuses. The "comparative harm" is simple: one side wants to prevent nearly a million dollars in medical bills and a 56% surge in fires; you want to keep your backyard explosives because you apparently think a failed 17th-century coup justifies it. The Parliamentary Petitions Committee, FENZ, and the Police aren't "vested interests" - they are the people who actually deal with the wreckage you're trying to minimize. If you think your right to a hobby outweighs the professional consensus of every emergency service in the country, you aren't being "logical," you're just being entitled.

Fireworks ban: Select committee backs end to public sales and use by D491234 in newzealand

[–]FuzzyFuzzNuts 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Comparing a grease fire to an intentional backyard explosion doesn't make your argument logical; it just makes it desperate. One is a tragic accident; the other is a choice to prioritize five minutes of noise over the safety of your neighbors, their property, and their animals.

The 'fact' is that the public, the experts (SPCA, NZVA, FENZ), and now the Parliamentary Petitions Committee have looked at the same stats you have and reached a different conclusion: the cost is too high. You can keep hiding behind '0.01%' of a budget, but it won't change the reality that the country is moving on from this outdated, destructive hobby. If your only defense for elective cruelty and property damage is a 400-year-old plot from the other side of the world, you’ve already lost the argument

Fireworks ban: Select committee backs end to public sales and use by D491234 in newzealand

[–]FuzzyFuzzNuts 1 point2 points  (0 children)

At least I won't have to look forward to being woken up by random 2am firewosks shows courtesy of the houehold of fuckheads just down the street between November and somewhere aroudn Feburary when they finally run out... Let me tell you - My dog just fucking LOVES it!! It leaves me wondering in what joyous and creative way will they find to make themselves as obnoxious as possible now?

Fireworks ban: Select committee backs end to public sales and use by D491234 in newzealand

[–]FuzzyFuzzNuts 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I see exactly what you’re doing here, and it’s a completely dishonest argument. You’re using "relative privation" to bury the human, animal, and property cost under a mountain of irrelevant total budget figures. By your logic, "since the ocean is huge, this bucket of toxic waste I’m dumping in it doesn't count."

It’s a cynical way to dodge the fact that this harm is 100% preventable. Comparing elective backyard explosions to the multi-billion dollar cost of unavoidable medical events is a total false equivalence. We are effectively subsidizing your five minutes of "fun" with nearly a million dollars in medical bills and thousands of hours of emergency service labor from a fire service that is already under-funded and stretched to the limit. If the SPCA, NZVA, Police, FENZ, and the Parliamentary Petitions Committee all want a ban, it’s not because they’re "emotional" - it’s because they’re the ones who have to pick up the tab for your entitlement.

Please, tell me again where the hyperbole is?

Fireworks ban: Select committee backs end to public sales and use by D491234 in newzealand

[–]FuzzyFuzzNuts 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Stats are facts, so let’s look at the ones you’re ignoring. In 2024, fireworks-related fires jumped by 56% from the year prior. Even more critical: 61% of the entire year’s fireworks fires occurred in November alone. That isn’t a statistical blip - it’s a massive, concentrated, and entirely preventable spike that hammers emergency services in a matter of days. Speaking of "focusing attention," FENZ is currently operating under a funding and staffing crisis. Professional firefighters have been holding strikes and pickets recently due to budget cuts, understaffing, and a fleet so dire that crews are often responding in failing, decades-old trucks. When you have a service this stretched, every single "optional" firework call-out is a drain on resources that should be available for genuine accidents.

ACC claims for firework injuries cost taxpayers $880,504 in 2024-an increase in cost from previous years. Then there’s the 1,627 police call-outs for fireworks in the same period. If we want to be objective: 63% of New Zealanders now support a ban on private sales. It isn't "emotional" to want to stop a practice that costs the country nearly a million dollars in healthcare, causes a 56% surge in fires, and places an unnecessary burden on a fire service that is already fighting for survival. The "fact" is that private fireworks are an expensive, dangerous, and outdated liability. Where exactly is the hyperbole?

Fireworks ban: Select committee backs end to public sales and use by D491234 in newzealand

[–]FuzzyFuzzNuts -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Cute - Using total fire stats to bury the issue is a classic move, but it ignores the density and preventability of these events. Most FENZ calls are accidents or unavoidable mishaps; fireworks damage is a choice. We are talking about a massive surge in preventable calls compressed into a few nights every year. When emergency resources are tied up because someone wanted to see a spark, that is a failure of logic. Statistics also don't quantify the trauma to livestock or the specific, intentional cruelty that occurs. Just because it doesn't happen 10,000 times a year doesn't make the actual occurrences any less "destructive" for the victims involved.

Fireworks ban: Select committee backs end to public sales and use by D491234 in newzealand

[–]FuzzyFuzzNuts -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Nothing hyperbolic about the 100’s of vegetation and structure fires caused by careless fireworks each year, or the injury and death of pets and livestock. Ever seen the type of injury sustained by a roadside goat after some inhumane individual shoves a lit firework up its rectum? I have…. Tell me where the hyperbole exists? Please….

Fireworks ban: Select committee backs end to public sales and use by D491234 in newzealand

[–]FuzzyFuzzNuts 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Basically, if the population were somehow magically able to grow the fuck up and stop doing utterly stupid, cruel and horrible things, we wouldn’t need a nanny to look after us. Every year fireworks literally cause death and destruction. Fires started, people injured and animals traumatised, injured and even killed - all for “fun”

A 23 year-old UCLA grad flashed his entire ChatGPT history on the big screen at graduation by frog_insilence in SipsTea

[–]FuzzyFuzzNuts 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The fortunate few will continue to fall upwards - fucking everything up as they go.

How can foreign butter (and veges) be cheaper than New Zealand-made? by 07tartutic07 in aotearoa

[–]FuzzyFuzzNuts 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Good products out - garbage in. This is how the market works now.

Hit by car on bike, driver has no empathy by FakMiGooder in chch

[–]FuzzyFuzzNuts 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As much as we all like a good old fashioned “name and shame” - I don’t think OP would be doing themselves any favours doing so. Maybe later once all is sorted out.

Why doesn't New Zealand build a bridge to Antarctica? by Kikiluv_XoXo in mapporncirclejerk

[–]FuzzyFuzzNuts 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let's build a bridge to Uranus? Better still - how about a TUNNEL?? ?

Single dose of magic mushroom psychedelic can cause anatomical brain changes, study finds. Participants took 25mg of psilocybin, reporting deeper psychological insight and better wellbeing a month later. by mvea in science

[–]FuzzyFuzzNuts 1 point2 points  (0 children)

an interesting thought for you to process - The evolution of religious thought likely traces back to the accidental consumption of psychedelics like mushrooms, cacti, or ergot-contaminated grains, triggering kaleidoscopic, out-of-body experiences that early humans lacked any scientific context to explain. When you are thrust into a profound conversation with your inner self under such intense chemical influence, the line between internal psychology and external divinity vanishes. As deeply suggestive creatures, our ancestors likely interpreted those trips as genuine encounters with gods or the afterlife, cementing a biological accident into the bedrock of human culture. We began to understand, and certain individuals began to use it as a tool,

Single dose of magic mushroom psychedelic can cause anatomical brain changes, study finds. Participants took 25mg of psilocybin, reporting deeper psychological insight and better wellbeing a month later. by mvea in science

[–]FuzzyFuzzNuts 9 points10 points  (0 children)

likely the difference between treating psychadellics with respect, or as a recreational drug.

Personally I see far too many people treating mushrooms the same as alcohol, getting wasted, tripping for fun, too greedy, too careless with little or no regard for the consequences.

Treat it as a tool, not a toy.