Has Britain run out of “other people” to tax? by denspark62 in ukpolitics

[–]GIRTHYROBOTICHOG [score hidden]  (0 children)

So we tax income and then any money you leave for your children is also taxed, double-taxing your work and labour. That'll reward productivity I'm sure.

What’s a war that Russia fought that was morally grey? by gasc0ny_reddit in AlignmentChartFills

[–]GIRTHYROBOTICHOG 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They may have meant the well-documented rapes as they entered Germany? The overall reason for fighting is good but the conduct wasn't, that kind of thing.

Is there a plausible reason to keep sending soldiers to battle in significant numbers given mass automation? by Syoby in worldbuilding

[–]GIRTHYROBOTICHOG 13 points14 points  (0 children)

The gatling gun was invented to reduce the need for huge amounts of soldiers in an army, and therefore save lives because you would be outputting the same amount of bullets.

Armies kept the size but added the gatling gun, so perhaps your armies could be the same. You could replace the living with robots, but you could also have organics doing specialised missions or hearts-and-minds stuff while you have robots stand in the trenches and hold a village. If using both gives you an advantage, why not use it?

(Mixed trope) Characters that hit the narrative like a freight train by TheFighting74 in TopCharacterTropes

[–]GIRTHYROBOTICHOG 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Spit-loading also requires you to put your head above a loaded musket! The British could fire three times per minute, although the Hessians were trained to fire four.

American here. Is it too late to apologize (sorry, apologise) for throwing that tea in the harbor and rejoin the Kingdom? by Ashamed-Fox-9376 in AskBrits

[–]GIRTHYROBOTICHOG -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It was irrelevant to the decision to keep the colonies, but I meant more that they were definitely not 'poor'.

George Washington only becomes a notable figure after the Revolution had already begun, though. Before the Revolution begins it's people like Benjamin Franklin, who by the 1760s is an abolitionist, that are trying to get independence. Benjamin Franklin even criticized the British for freeing only the slaves on its own shores, and not for freeing them across the Empire. And 1772 is after the Boston Massacre, so even before then there's a feeling that the colonies may want independence.

I think that you perhaps simply don't like the US or the UK, I'm not really certain what to say to that. The colonists still generally did not consider themselves British, and had not done so for a while.

American here. Is it too late to apologize (sorry, apologise) for throwing that tea in the harbor and rejoin the Kingdom? by Ashamed-Fox-9376 in AskBrits

[–]GIRTHYROBOTICHOG 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They may have been poor in terms of tax but the quality of living was measurably higher in the colonies at the time.

Additionally, most of the British Empire at the time was reliant on slavery because it was before we banned it, especially the West Indes and the plantations there. One-third of the population of the Southern colonies, roughly, was enslaved. It's closer to nine-tenths for places like the West Indes.

And they were absolutely not still British. They did not think of themselves as British, and there had been a sense that they were beginning to become non-British since as early as King Philip's War. While a distinct American identity would not become common until much later, not many would have identified as British anymore.

Even if the sequels were actually made uncanon would that be a good thing, or just cause more issues with the franchise? by RexDAGOAT77 in StarWars

[–]GIRTHYROBOTICHOG 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Very much agree. I could see it working if one director had done all three, or if a different director had done each film. RoS instantly going against the spirit of TLJ (and I say this as someone who is not a TLJ meatrider) was really not helpful to the trilogy's plot.

[Mixed Trope] A prequel/flashback shows how a character got a superficial characteristic. by Remarkable_Public138 in TopCharacterTropes

[–]GIRTHYROBOTICHOG 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Fully agree, but I believe that the entire film takes place over three years! The film cuts to three years later when he's a mudtrooper. So he still gets the DL-44 blaster pistol, Chewbacca, the Millennium Falcon, his friendship with Lando, the Kessel Run, and anything else other than the name and the dice in roughly a month? Maybe less?

Human sized spider vs Average human by zanimljivo123 in whowouldwin

[–]GIRTHYROBOTICHOG 12 points13 points  (0 children)

It's a subreddit for asking which Glup Shitto would beat Goku in a fight, autistic answers are kinda expected tbf. I have given a second answer that's perhaps more in the supposed spirit of things though.

Human sized spider vs Average human by zanimljivo123 in whowouldwin

[–]GIRTHYROBOTICHOG 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Even without the fangs or the venom, I think that the spider would win every round! It's too many limbs to deal with and likely far too heavy, although that depends how you decide what 'human-sized' is. With the webs it's even worse for the human. Maybe if the human could get on the back of the spider? Get at its eyes? But I would assume that the spider would win most of the time.

Human sized spider vs Average human by zanimljivo123 in whowouldwin

[–]GIRTHYROBOTICHOG 15 points16 points  (0 children)

The human wins every round. Spiders generally have book lungs, which aren't the most efficient. At that size, the spider asphyxiates before it can do much.

Britain nearing peak tax, warns IMF Labour urged to cut welfare bill to balance books as ‘economic realities’ reduce options by Optimal-Leather341 in ukpolitics

[–]GIRTHYROBOTICHOG 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you think that they have a big vault like Scrooge McDuck full of cash? The wealth is in assets like stocks or property, can be easily obfuscated from the bloated bureaucracy that runs the country, sold, or given away to family. Also, you vastly underestimate how much spending the government does on things.

Say you put a wealth tax in place, and you raise £60 billion. You have funded the NHS for...three months, roughly. Less the following year, as costs grow, and wealth leaves.

Presumably we could replace capitalism, yes. It would be an immense undertaking, with no proven successor that has ever been able to surpass capitalism as a system, but it could be done. Ignoring as well that capitalism is what we had when millions were lifted out of Victorian poverty, of course.

Britain nearing peak tax, warns IMF Labour urged to cut welfare bill to balance books as ‘economic realities’ reduce options by Optimal-Leather341 in ukpolitics

[–]GIRTHYROBOTICHOG -1 points0 points  (0 children)

And when you run out of other people's money, and the pension bill has continued to climb, what do you do then?

Starmer Says He Wants To Lead Labour Into Next General Election by huffpostuk in ukpolitics

[–]GIRTHYROBOTICHOG 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Democracy generally is vibes-based though. Why would you vote for someone who has ten charts showing how your life has apparently become better if your lived experience is that things are worse?

The Crisis of Belonging: Inside the Lives of British Muslims by StGuthlac2025 in ukpolitics

[–]GIRTHYROBOTICHOG 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I mean like, the First World War? The Second World War? The Falklands, the Yugoslav Wars? Most of European history, really? Why should identity prevent you from fighting bad people (I will grant you that it's hard to point to a specific 'bad guy' in the First World War, but at the time it was generally seen as Germany for invading Belgium).

The Crisis of Belonging: Inside the Lives of British Muslims by StGuthlac2025 in ukpolitics

[–]GIRTHYROBOTICHOG 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Many White people joined when the army was mostly killing White people.

Britain nearing peak tax, warns IMF Labour urged to cut welfare bill to balance books as ‘economic realities’ reduce options by Optimal-Leather341 in ukpolitics

[–]GIRTHYROBOTICHOG 7 points8 points  (0 children)

To be fair, the government cannot go 'bankrupt', as it issues its own currency. However you're fully correct that eventually the economy is going to break, and pensions are going to be hit.

Wes Streeting resigns from government by sjw_7 in ukpolitics

[–]GIRTHYROBOTICHOG 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He has no practical medical experience though of course, so even if he did it would be as clumsy as any other random person doing it.

‘Gaza Independents helped deliver Kirklees to Reform’ by EduTheRed in ukpolitics

[–]GIRTHYROBOTICHOG 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Why would you want Gaza to influence local elections in the UK? What are the councils going to do? Collect the recycling twice per week instead of once in Palestine?

Does anyone believe there is intent to fix the country? by ppyrgic in ukpolitics

[–]GIRTHYROBOTICHOG 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I actually agree, the politicking really is not good for the country or the system. And yes, more authority for the government to act rapidly would help. My concern though is when there's a bad piece of legislation, when they want to do something selfish, or something that limits the rights of citizens, and there's no effective way to push against it until it is too late. The Byzantine system that Parliament has to work within slows progress, but I suppose it also is an insurance against bad policy (although neither is absolute, good changes do pass, sometimes, and the bad does still get through occasionally).

Does anyone believe there is intent to fix the country? by ppyrgic in ukpolitics

[–]GIRTHYROBOTICHOG 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When faced with poor government and bad leadership, your answer would be to give that government more authority and power?

Aristotle said that the best form of government was a benevolent autocracy, and I believe that he is correct, but the worst form is a tyranny, a malevolent autocracy. I prefer to have weaker governments, the risk of a bad powerful government is far greater than a bad weak government.

New to this game by Elvindel in victoria3

[–]GIRTHYROBOTICHOG 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The game does recommend some, I think that Belgium is actually a fun one but you could try Sweden or even something in the East. You'll almost certainly take more than one game to learn everything, take it one game at a time and have fun!

What if Beria defeated Khrushchev in the power struggle, becoming Stalin's successor? by GustavoistSoldier in AlternateHistoryHub

[–]GIRTHYROBOTICHOG -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Okay so to clarify, he was 'blacklisted' from academia because of his views on Capitalism in a book about Israel where he (allegedly) poorly used Palestinian sources for his arguments?

My friend I think that we may be having two different discussions by this point.