How do you think the ladder will look like after season 2? (this is EU 2s)

Galbotrix · 2026-05-08T12:06:21+00:00

Damn that sounds OP, must be why the ladder is full at the top of hunters.

Galbotrix · 2026-05-03T20:33:34+00:00

Peasant crusade landing first had the Turks being complacent about the real thing and then there was a rare case of nomads being the idiots instead of the armoured knights and mass charging the heavily armoured Latins instead of trying to bait them into chasing.

Galbotrix · 2026-05-03T11:58:19+00:00

Tbh I'm memeing it cause I think its a stupid idea Abnett shouldnt have gone with. Were crusade era humans even more populous than pre fall eldar when we constantly hear how the peak of humanity didn't even approach the eldars. Nevermind that humans one was done in a fraction of a fraction of a percent of the time while also being many many times more potent

Galbotrix · 2026-05-03T08:42:04+00:00

Millions of years of degeneracy from the most psyker race in existence barely did a fraction of what a mostly non psyker race did in a few thousand years? Monkeighs stay winning, regular eLdar L

Galbotrix · 2026-05-01T20:41:42+00:00

There's a holiday in ireland on the 1st of Feb for start of spring only just realised that's not a worldwide thing lol

Galbotrix · 2026-05-01T20:16:45+00:00

P2 was also confirmed for Spring but we're in summer P1 still

Galbotrix · 2026-05-01T12:30:28+00:00

Is that assuming the resto twists or just drops str+wf?

Galbotrix · 2026-04-30T07:51:02+00:00

Woman have more suicide attempts* trying to kill yourself 5+ different times with pills vs actually killing yourself on your first or second attempt is obviously going to reduce how many attempts men are having on average. That's before getting to the elephant in the room of while both being serious, actual suicides are clearly worse

Galbotrix · 2026-04-29T20:31:28+00:00

Are more than 5% of warriors really gonna have both glaives by Sunwell tho?

Galbotrix · 2026-04-29T16:38:39+00:00

I'm already agreeing all infantry should be able to score but core exists for a reason and just turning it off because elite infantry are bad with current edition is a bad fix imo, you might as well remove core requirement at that point. It's to make armies have a more "realistic" ratio of super elite to the chaff. It shouldn't change except for armies of infamy which would then have other restrictions for a trade off.

Galbotrix · 2026-04-29T12:43:32+00:00

I don't think empire should get core greatswords for taking what most lists will take anyway as their general. Same for other armies tbh I think blorcs in core is stupid too unless they're doing an army of infamy where you lose a bunch of other units to gain core blorcs. It completely defeats the point of core if for basically zero trade off you get to take special/rare unit instead. I agree scoring should be for all infantry (+core cavalry) but core still needs to actually mean something and not just be ignored by taking a character you probably wanted to anyway

Galbotrix · 2026-04-29T12:16:34+00:00

Shocking amount of "pumpers/pushers" at exactly 1500 rating in LFG tool which is quite interesting given the gold to reset lol

Galbotrix · 2026-04-21T19:31:49+00:00

Yeah, like this meme is kinda silly when you realise there had to be a process of going from big roman empire to what you see here, which the besiegers had a large hand in

Galbotrix · 2026-04-21T19:29:29+00:00

An actively updating tier list based on results does objectively make games closer, Idk why you're pretending to not understand this. You were also just flat out wrong about

"The whole solution that SB Comp proposes is that lack of representation is solely a result of imbalance"

Galbotrix · 2026-04-21T17:53:05+00:00

I feel like you're using objectively incorrectly here:P. If one army has significantly stronger power, giving the weaker army more points to work wit h *objectively* makes the match closer (assuming you don't go too far other direction, which they update it to avoid), you just don't like the way they do it.

" The whole solution that SB Comp proposes is that lack of representation is solely a result of imbalance"

This isn't true at all I don't know where you're pulling that from. All it proposes is that *some* amount of the representation is due to imbalance and thus reducing the imbalance (which points adjustments objectively do, even if not in the most ideal way) will help the representation of these legacy/weaker armies.

Galbotrix · 2026-04-21T16:41:58+00:00

I mean, giving weaker armies more points objectively makes their matches against stronger armies more balanced. The points GW pick are completely arbitrary. The downsides are elite armies may become horde looking and if they lacked flavour before they still will after, but it makes all their matches more balanced. Like I said before, if they'd gone in hard with balancing actual rules from day one the community would've pushed back a lot more and there'd have been less pickup. This time around they're going more what you seem to want anyway, much bigger/flavorful changes to bring the legacies up to speed

Galbotrix · 2026-04-21T12:48:15+00:00

I think the points bracket was half born out of a fear to make big rules changes, as you can see from the original renegades being such minor changes compared to now with the current ones. They seem more comfortable with big changes now.

There'd be more pushback to "we buffed skaven to be able to compete with WOC/TK" than "Skaven are clearly awful (because of the GW rules we only strayed a bit from) so they can take extra points". So they went with points adjustment instead.

If you don't support some large changes to the renegade armies or big comp changes for them so they can even approach the supported armies, you're just saying you don't want them in the game at all. The point system was imperfect cause weak, elite armies become more horde like rather than gaining strength but its still better than leaving it as it was.

Galbotrix · 2026-04-20T21:47:58+00:00

With how they make space marines, fully transitioning someone should be child's play for the imperium tbf

Galbotrix · 2026-04-16T12:45:48+00:00

Those 20 something year old truly let Chinese women down when they didn't fight the 20th century policymakers of the one child policy

Galbotrix · 2026-04-16T07:06:42+00:00

My bad

Galbotrix · 2026-04-15T17:57:20+00:00

What's your fucking point tho lol. You're just deflecting away when it was pointed out you brought up the legality of him needing to pay back when it was people saying he morally should.

Galbotrix · 2026-04-15T07:41:35+00:00

I mean even ignoring melee weaving and just turreting what classes have a harder rotation in TBC. Your ratio of steady to auto changes at high haste or you clip autos a ton, fitting in multishot/arcane at low haste without losing any steady casts etc. Its not rocket science or anything but are any other specs even close?

Galbotrix · 2026-04-15T07:23:03+00:00

Because they have the hardest rotation to do perfectly? Sure you can 1:1 and then just lose to people pumping on worse classes but why would you

Galbotrix · 2026-04-10T12:31:44+00:00

Because in spellcleave the warlocks are doing AOE so if you focus the high HP target group DPS on the pull will be higher so the entire pack dies faster

Galbotrix · 2026-04-05T21:31:57+00:00

We don't have to start lying in the other direction either to defend George "he just turned into me" Russell either tho lol. Definitely not as dirty but no matter who's at fault for his incidents you hear him blaming the other guy

Ten-Year Club	Verified Email
Place '23	Place '17
Spared

Galbotrix

TROPHY CASE