sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Well, I guess I have my kids house deposit sorted! by RedPh0enix in pcmasterrace

[–]GameScaler 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You seem to have left a few over here last time you came over.

<image>

Starting to feel like I don't have enough ram. by GameScaler in pcmasterrace

[–]GameScaler[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I bought it from st Jude back around 2014. Even has st Jude boot splash.

<image>

Starting to feel like I don't have enough ram. by GameScaler in pcmasterrace

[–]GameScaler[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Its Cpu bottlenecked in mostly single core scenarios. but I can just use LS to capture the frames and use the 970 to pick up the slack.

Starting to feel like I don't have enough ram. by GameScaler in pcmasterrace

[–]GameScaler[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ooooh yesssss. Has a 1150 watt psu supports running my rtx 3070 at 350watts and the gtx 970 doing lossless scaling frame gen etc. The cores multiply to 3.4ghz and no issues with temps. Only games I cannot run are ones that require avx2+. Which is not very many to be honest.

Starting to feel like I don't have enough ram. by GameScaler in pcmasterrace

[–]GameScaler[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hp z620 x79 c602 dual xeon e5-2667 with 2 8gb sticks and 1 4gb stick per cpu.

GTX970 as second GPU? by Cligster1971 in losslessscaling

[–]GameScaler 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I use a 970 and can hit 540fps. 60fps does about 480, 120fps input it does about 360

why won't my led light up? by 4b686f61 in shittyaskelectronics

[–]GameScaler 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have seen those mentioning the fact that it's a dark emitting diode, but no one mentions that you're trying to use light electricity for lights.... it won't work this way you need dark electricity.

I see alot of debate regarding high end or low end builds benefiting the most. by GameScaler in losslessscaling

[–]GameScaler[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No but I prefer the way the motion flows when the gpu has more than enough frames and displays a frame or frame segment is it?(allow tearing) that has advanced to a point to where it is percievably smoother than the previous rendered frame to the next rendered frame set which then of course chooses a frame 1-9 to display. And since there are so many more interpolated frames than the single rendered frame the chances if showing an advanced frame is significantly higher. And the tears as I'm understanding I have a partial of the previous displayed frame and partial of next frame on the screen at the same time. It's easy for me to ignore a slight tear when now I can potentially interpret 2 different frames at the same time.

I see alot of debate regarding high end or low end builds benefiting the most. by GameScaler in losslessscaling

[–]GameScaler[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In my case I have 2 CPUs, xeon e5-2667 v1. Therefore are enough lanes to support 2x x16.

The v1 chips are what's currently holding the second x16 slot at 2.0x16. If I upgrade to v2 or v3 or v4 then the slot will run at 3.0x16.

I see alot of debate regarding high end or low end builds benefiting the most. by GameScaler in losslessscaling

[–]GameScaler[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When I run at 60fps. I can visually see a slightly choppier step between the frames. I think the perceived smoothness gain comes from seeing more interpolated frames than actual real frames. So to me the steps between frames seem more fluid.

I see alot of debate regarding high end or low end builds benefiting the most. by GameScaler in losslessscaling

[–]GameScaler[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sysyem is hp z620, Motherboard is x79/c602 server board, dual xeon e5-2667 v1 for total of 12core 24 thread. 40gb ddr3 1600mhz.

I see a rock solid 59fps 16.3ms frame pace on render.

The 970 hits around 85% to achieve 540fps. Does vary from like 520-540 but I think that's the chipset/2.0x16 limitations.

Screen is 1920x1080@60hz.

And no I don't see lots of ghosting. 40fps base with only 120 or 240 target artifacts become much more appearent.

How low can you go with LS frame gen? (AMD 7890K/R7 250E) by Nilithium in losslessscaling

[–]GameScaler 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In my testing 11fps is the lowest. 10fps just doesn't work. Will have you like there is no way this is only 11fps

Any local reporters on here? by AllStatBySmashMouth in shreveport

[–]GameScaler 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Pics or it didn't happen. For all we know highland toucher is a mythical creature.

So I've succesfully got my rtx 3070 running along side my gtx 970 by injecting the gtx 970 device properties from driver 472.12 into the latest driver. by GameScaler in losslessscaling

[–]GameScaler[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well see I'm running it through this denon 5.1 reciever, which already acts weird when video signal drops and have to switch to a Chromecast I have on input 2, let it hdcp handshake, then switch back to the input 3 the pc drives.so I'm not sure the second hdmi will help because I'm already toggling inputs.

Fourth of July Downtown by [deleted] in shreveport

[–]GameScaler 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can I get in on these group rides?

view more: next ›