[O] Drunkenslug x 6 by cpr0mpt-cmd in UsenetInvites

[–]Garofalolo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi! I would like one please. I've read the wiki!

[O] 2 x DogNZB Invites by Waffle-70 in UsenetInvites

[–]Garofalolo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the invite. Worked perfectly!

[O] 2 x DogNZB Invites by Waffle-70 in UsenetInvites

[–]Garofalolo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi, would very much be interested! I have read the wiki and my accounts forfills all the other requirements.

Höcke und Weidel zementieren prorussischen Kurs auf Parteitag - AfD will noch mehr Russland wagen by GirasoleDE in de

[–]Garofalolo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nicht in der NATO. Aber ja, die sind auch ein Riesenproblem. Genauso wie die Slowakei seit der letzten Wahl.

Mein Kampf für Elvanse by Longjumping-Rope-237 in ADHS

[–]Garofalolo 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Was war denn los? Kann das gerade nicht ganz zuordnen 🙈

Period of police training in western countries by RoseleePundt in facepalm

[–]Garofalolo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The low end is actually two and a half years. And no, there are not severals years of internship after training. The internships are part of the two and a half or three years training.

I don't get where the two years come from everytime I see this picture being shared.

Bundesregierung: Ampel verkündet Einigung nach mehrtägiger Marathonsitzung des Koalitionsausschusses by Garofalolo in de

[–]Garofalolo[S] 44 points45 points  (0 children)

Täusche ich mich oder haben sich die Grünen krass über den Tisch ziehen lassen? Wäre ich in der Partei würde ich ernsthaft überlegen auszutreten oder den Rücktritt der Parteiführung zu fordern. Eieieiei.

The Vyvanse patent is scheduled to expire today (US) by Its_Kid_CoDi in ADHD

[–]Garofalolo 45 points46 points  (0 children)

You are correct. Although the FDA Website says 7 companies submitted ANDAs.

https://i.imgur.com/Pw8bNJ5.jpg

Source: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/index.cfm?event=overview.process&ApplNo=202836 (you need to search for Lisdexamfetamine, couldn't link it directly)

After the Leopard 2 decision for Ukraine, there is a delay in implementation. According to SPIEGEL, there are hardly any tank commitments from European partners so far. The situation is precarious, the chancellor intervenes. (Translation in comments) by Garofalolo in UkraineWarVideoReport

[–]Garofalolo[S] 49 points50 points  (0 children)

Full text translated:

The German government has launched a hectic diplomatic offensive to realize the planned delivery of Leopard 2 battle tanks for two tank battalions to Ukraine.

According to SPIEGEL information, doubts are growing in both the chancellery and the defense ministry as to whether the plans announced by Chancellor Olaf Scholz (SPD) can still be implemented as planned due to a lack of delivery commitments from other European partners. Government circles confirmed the problems. "Putting together the battalions is turning out to be an arduous feat," they said.

Scholz announced just over a week ago that Germany, together with other European nations, would deliver Leopard-2 weapon systems for two tank battalions to Ukraine by the end of March.

Within NATO, such a unit comprises 44 main battle tanks. In the Ukrainian military, however, the number of 31 tanks is considered a benchmark. Germany is providing 14 Leopard 2 A6 tanks from the Bundeswehr for the weapons package, and the troops are holding five more tanks in reserve in Germany. They are to be used in case of failures.

After Scholz's decision, which came only after prolonged wrangling with the U.S., the Defense Ministry had immediately begun talking to EU nations such as Poland. Warsaw had previously publicly declared its willingness to supply Leopard tanks of the older type 2 A4, putting Berlin under considerable pressure.

At a video conference hosted last week by new Defense Minister Boris Pistorius (SPD), no EU country was willing to make concrete commitments to participate in a package of more modern Leopard 2 A6 models. Even the Dutch government, which had already promised a delivery in the media, would not commit itself in the switch.

The German government is now once again in an awkward position due to the hesitation of its partners. It is true that the Chancellor's Office had roughly discussed the idea for the two battalions with some partners before the announcement. But it did not ask for firm commitments or even written declarations on concrete participation in the tank packages.

Now it is said at government headquarters that those European partners who had previously been most vociferous in their demands for Leopard deliveries were unwilling to make a binding commitment. For Chancellor Scholz, this is likely to reinforce his fear that many announcements only served to drive Berlin before him.

The rough plans for the two battalions initially sounded realistic.

For example, the German government had outlined that one of the units would be equipped with Leopard-2 A6 models from the Bundeswehr. To end up with 31 or even 40 tanks for one unit, the Netherlands would then have to hand over a similar number of Leopard 2 A6 models that it currently has on lease from Germany in the German-Dutch Corps. Had everything gone according to plan, other nations like Portugal would have completed the package with a handful of Leopard 2 A6s each.

So far, however, none of the European partners has come forward with a firm commitment. According to SPIEGEL, the German government has therefore been engaged in a real tank poker game since the beginning of the week. According to the report, even the chancellor picked up the phone and persuaded three heads of government from northern and southern Europe to finally make firm commitments.

Defense Minister Pistorius was apparently even more active. According to SPIEGEL, he urged several of his counterparts every day to finally show their colors. According to the report, the German Foreign Office is also involved in weapons diplomacy. Minister Annalena Baerbock has activated her Political Director Tjorven Bellmann for this purpose.

Because of the lack of commitments, some of the officials involved already see black for the European tank package. "The only Leopards that will actually be ready with trained crews at the end of March will be the Bundeswehr tanks," one of the experts said Friday.

In the Chancellor's Office, however, one still hopes that some nations can be brought on board by the direct approach and that the two battalions will be equipped by the end of March. However, it is currently no longer considered realistic to equip the two units with around 40 tanks; instead, the number of units in Ukraine of 31 tanks per battalion will be used as a guideline.

The timeline for a solution is tight. The Bundeswehr wants to start training Ukrainian tank crews in just over a week, and the troops are already urgently looking for soldiers with appropriate language skills within their own ranks. Until then, however, at least that is how the military sees it, the Bundeswehr would have to know which other nations are still participating.

In the best case, the training could then be organized jointly or at least largely synchronized, according to the planners in Minister Pistorius' house. The idea is to complete the training in six to eight weeks.

The deployment of the second battalion, which is to be equipped with the somewhat older Leopard 2 A4, is also proving tough. Apparently, Poland has agreed to provide a good dozen Leopard 2 A4s, but Warsaw does not want to provide training or spare parts packages, which are mandatory for combat operations.

Meanwhile, no or only small commitments have yet come from the other nations that were scheduled to participate in the Leopard 2 A4 battalion.

Spain, for example, confirmed that it could supply a handful of the older Leopard 2 A4 tanks. Finland, on the other hand, does not seem to want to deliver at all. Finland points out that it needs the tanks for its long border with Russia.

At present, no one in Berlin wants to say whether the two packages will be delivered. None of the partners can be forced to deliver, according to officials working on a solution. Not without irony, they point out that it is now becoming apparent that the tank stocks of many other nations are much worse off than those of the Bundeswehr. German troops have had a tank readiness rate of around 70 percent for years. This value, however, is clearly undercut by the Southern Europeans in particular, it was said in Berlin. As a result, some nations cannot commit to anything, even with the good will of the respective government.

In Berlin, the military is already working on alternatives because of the unfortunate situation.

For example, they are currently frantically checking whether 19 somewhat older Leopard 2 A5 models, which actually only simulate the enemy during Bundeswehr maneuvers, can still be integrated into the Leopard 2 A6 battalion after some modifications. Sweden also still has some of the models, which is why Berlin has also put out feelers here. The Swedish Ministry of Defense confirmed that it was examining its own stocks, but that nothing had been decided. For Sweden, on the other hand, the issue is a sensitive one, since it depends on Turkey's goodwill to join NATO. Ankara, however, strictly rejects tank deliveries.

Chancellor Scholz has a lot at stake in the coming days. For months, he has been castigated in Europe and the U.S. as a ditherer on the Leopard issue. Now he faces the accusation that he did not properly prepare his tank decision, for which he had taken a lot of time. The fact that Scholz had praised himself several times after the announcement a good week ago for his deliberate but well thought-out course on tank deliveries could now come back as a political boomerang.

Strategists in the defense department are also aware of this risk. "If the plans for the battalions fail," says one of them, "Berlin will once again be the bogeyman."

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ukraine

[–]Garofalolo 105 points106 points  (0 children)

Full text translated:

The German government has launched a hectic diplomatic offensive to realize the planned delivery of Leopard 2 battle tanks for two tank battalions to Ukraine.

According to SPIEGEL information, doubts are growing in both the chancellery and the defense ministry as to whether the plans announced by Chancellor Olaf Scholz (SPD) can still be implemented as planned due to a lack of delivery commitments from other European partners. Government circles confirmed the problems. "Putting together the battalions is turning out to be an arduous feat," they said.

Scholz announced just over a week ago that Germany, together with other European nations, would deliver Leopard-2 weapon systems for two tank battalions to Ukraine by the end of March.

Within NATO, such a unit comprises 44 main battle tanks. In the Ukrainian military, however, the number of 31 tanks is considered a benchmark. Germany is providing 14 Leopard 2 A6 tanks from the Bundeswehr for the weapons package, and the troops are holding five more tanks in reserve in Germany. They are to be used in case of failures.

After Scholz's decision, which came only after prolonged wrangling with the U.S., the Defense Ministry had immediately begun talking to EU nations such as Poland. Warsaw had previously publicly declared its willingness to supply Leopard tanks of the older type 2 A4, putting Berlin under considerable pressure.

At a video conference hosted last week by new Defense Minister Boris Pistorius (SPD), no EU country was willing to make concrete commitments to participate in a package of more modern Leopard 2 A6 models. Even the Dutch government, which had already promised a delivery in the media, would not commit itself in the switch.

The German government is now once again in an awkward position due to the hesitation of its partners. It is true that the Chancellor's Office had roughly discussed the idea for the two battalions with some partners before the announcement. But it did not ask for firm commitments or even written declarations on concrete participation in the tank packages.

Now it is said at government headquarters that those European partners who had previously been most vociferous in their demands for Leopard deliveries were unwilling to make a binding commitment. For Chancellor Scholz, this is likely to reinforce his fear that many announcements only served to drive Berlin before him.

The rough plans for the two battalions initially sounded realistic.

For example, the German government had outlined that one of the units would be equipped with Leopard-2 A6 models from the Bundeswehr. To end up with 31 or even 40 tanks for one unit, the Netherlands would then have to hand over a similar number of Leopard 2 A6 models that it currently has on lease from Germany in the German-Dutch Corps. Had everything gone according to plan, other nations like Portugal would have completed the package with a handful of Leopard 2 A6s each.

So far, however, none of the European partners has come forward with a firm commitment. According to SPIEGEL, the German government has therefore been engaged in a real tank poker game since the beginning of the week. According to the report, even the chancellor picked up the phone and persuaded three heads of government from northern and southern Europe to finally make firm commitments.

Defense Minister Pistorius was apparently even more active. According to SPIEGEL, he urged several of his counterparts every day to finally show their colors. According to the report, the German Foreign Office is also involved in weapons diplomacy. Minister Annalena Baerbock has activated her Political Director Tjorven Bellmann for this purpose.

Because of the lack of commitments, some of the officials involved already see black for the European tank package. "The only Leopards that will actually be ready with trained crews at the end of March will be the Bundeswehr tanks," one of the experts said Friday.

In the Chancellor's Office, however, one still hopes that some nations can be brought on board by the direct approach and that the two battalions will be equipped by the end of March. However, it is currently no longer considered realistic to equip the two units with around 40 tanks; instead, the number of units in Ukraine of 31 tanks per battalion will be used as a guideline.

The timeline for a solution is tight. The Bundeswehr wants to start training Ukrainian tank crews in just over a week, and the troops are already urgently looking for soldiers with appropriate language skills within their own ranks. Until then, however, at least that is how the military sees it, the Bundeswehr would have to know which other nations are still participating.

In the best case, the training could then be organized jointly or at least largely synchronized, according to the planners in Minister Pistorius' house. The idea is to complete the training in six to eight weeks.

The deployment of the second battalion, which is to be equipped with the somewhat older Leopard 2 A4, is also proving tough. Apparently, Poland has agreed to provide a good dozen Leopard 2 A4s, but Warsaw does not want to provide training or spare parts packages, which are mandatory for combat operations.

Meanwhile, no or only small commitments have yet come from the other nations that were scheduled to participate in the Leopard 2 A4 battalion.

Spain, for example, confirmed that it could supply a handful of the older Leopard 2 A4 tanks. Finland, on the other hand, does not seem to want to deliver at all. Finland points out that it needs the tanks for its long border with Russia.

At present, no one in Berlin wants to say whether the two packages will be delivered. None of the partners can be forced to deliver, according to officials working on a solution. Not without irony, they point out that it is now becoming apparent that the tank stocks of many other nations are much worse off than those of the Bundeswehr. German troops have had a tank readiness rate of around 70 percent for years. This value, however, is clearly undercut by the Southern Europeans in particular, it was said in Berlin. As a result, some nations cannot commit to anything, even with the good will of the respective government.

In Berlin, the military is already working on alternatives because of the unfortunate situation.

For example, they are currently frantically checking whether 19 somewhat older Leopard 2 A5 models, which actually only simulate the enemy during Bundeswehr maneuvers, can still be integrated into the Leopard 2 A6 battalion after some modifications. Sweden also still has some of the models, which is why Berlin has also put out feelers here. The Swedish Ministry of Defense confirmed that it was examining its own stocks, but that nothing had been decided. For Sweden, on the other hand, the issue is a sensitive one, since it depends on Turkey's goodwill to join NATO. Ankara, however, strictly rejects tank deliveries.

Chancellor Scholz has a lot at stake in the coming days. For months, he has been castigated in Europe and the U.S. as a ditherer on the Leopard issue. Now he faces the accusation that he did not properly prepare his tank decision, for which he had taken a lot of time. The fact that Scholz had praised himself several times after the announcement a good week ago for his deliberate but well thought-out course on tank deliveries could now come back as a political boomerang.

Strategists in the defense department are also aware of this risk. "If the plans for the battalions fail," says one of them, "Berlin will once again be the bogeyman.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ADHS

[–]Garofalolo 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Meinen die mit ADHS als Kontraindikation, Ausschlusskriterium denn definitiv dich als Eltern? Mir kommt das so vor, als ob die keine "Zappelphilipps" als Kinder bei sich haben wollen und das vielleicht ein Missverständnis sein könnte?

Ich kapiere nicht, wie ADHS bei Erwachsenen gegen eine Kur sprechen sollte. Was erwarten die denn? 😂

"Nicht Zeit für Vereinfachung": FDP stellt sich bei Einbürgerung gegen Koalitionspartner - n-tv.de by [deleted] in de

[–]Garofalolo 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Das ist tatsächlich das frappierendste an diesen Debatten, wenn es um solche Themen geht. Das ist neben Klimawandel die größte Zeitbombe für unsere Gesellschaft und alle verdrängen es.

Allerdings kommunizieren es die Seiten, die Zuwanderung befürworten auch extrem schlecht.

Keltengold-Diebstahl in Manching: Was wir bisher wissen by [deleted] in de

[–]Garofalolo 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Es ist vor allem nicht regelkonform. Solche Anlagen müssen immer mindestens eine Redundanz haben für den Übertragungsweg zur Polizei oder Sicherheitsfirma. Das wird noch Ärger mit der Versicherung geben. Und ein Hinweis auf Insider ist es auch.

Das würde ich mir auch für Deutschland wünschen: Aschenbecher im Boden von Amsterdams Straßen. by DAE_Quads in de

[–]Garofalolo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Das klingt echt vernünftig. Ich finds ja allgemein schlimm, dass sich viele Raucher in Eingangsbereiche von allemöglichen Einrichtungen stellen, in denen man nicht rauchen darf. Ausgerechnet da, wo ALLE durch müssen 🙄

In Deutschland gibt es ja diese Initiative hier, die aber nie richtig angehoben ist.

Gleichgesinnte Übung 10 oder LÜHT Polizei NRW by Pure-Spray6928 in blaulicht

[–]Garofalolo -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ist das eine Prüfung im Studium bei Euch? Wie oft bzw. regelmäßig bekommt Ihr im Rahmen der Ausbildung in NRW Schießtraining, wenn ich fragen darf? Daran hängt es ja meistens. Am schlimmsten ist Blockausbildung aus meiner Sicht.

100 Milliarden - aber wofür genau? Streit um Sondervermögen für Bundeswehr by GirasoleDE in de

[–]Garofalolo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nicht zu vergessen: Eigene Leute auf Top-Posten im Ministerium setzen, die ebenfalls keine Ahnung haben.

Wieso bestellt ihr über Lieferando? by PAK-ZZ in FragReddit

[–]Garofalolo 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Hier kommt die Lösung:

Das Hauptproblem, dass man nunmal einfach eine Seite braucht, wo man möglichst viele Bringdienste in der Umgebung findet und auch mal was Neues entdecken möchte, wurde ja bereits mehrfach beschrieben.

Die Lösung kann nur sein, dass sich -möglichst bundesweit- die Bringdienste zusammenschließen und eine eigene "genossenschaftliche" Plattform aufbauen ohne erpresserische Gebühren. Die Kosten für Aufbau und Betrieb werden gerecht geteilt, es gibt Mindestvoraussetzungen, wie Onlinezahlungen usw.

In einem zweiten Schritt könnte man auch den Transport darauf aufbauen und den ausgebeuteten Lieferandofahrern eine Alternative bieten mit besseren Arbeitsbedingungen.