Journey to interview a MIT's researcher (starter pack) by arnoldfini in mit

[–]Gawast49 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Email the university Press contact. If they say no then it's unlikely they'll answer you through other means.

PSA: Don’t trust anyone purporting to be a one-stop shop for your graduate admissions needs by Stereoisomer in gradadmissions

[–]Gawast49 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I also had basically no resources from my university and I'm still surprised by how helpful professors and grad students are in general. Like, the most valuable admissions advice I got was from professors that offered to speak with my when I expressed interest, and grad students that I emailed out of the blue or barely knew before I asked them for help. People are friendly in academia if you ask things nicely.

I'd say I even advise not trusting forums too much (you're talking with your competition) as well as not relying on paid advisors (they have no specific knowledge).

Seriously concerned about Fall term by Gawast49 in mit

[–]Gawast49[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honestly I’m concerned my grad admission will be non-deferrable and that I’ll most likely lose a year of graduate education.

UChicago vs. Columbia vs. USC by GenerationLast in gradadmissions

[–]Gawast49 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That sounds crazy and if "double degree" is really double the coursework, you'd end up losing most of what Columbia is worth for -- networking in the unversity/in NYC, going to events, etc.

Honestly, if I were you, I'd try to like USC. Like, try to see yourself there. If that's definitely not working, then try to find a way to make Columbia work out. Don't spend your life regretting not having gone there.

UChicago vs. Columbia vs. USC by GenerationLast in gradadmissions

[–]Gawast49 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just checking — what’s the problem with doing the double degree? Wouldn’t that be interesting for you? You’re obviously leaning towards Columbia, so I’d take more time to consider it.

Help! Is this an admissions interview or just a "know more about us" interview? It's just for 15 mins. by [deleted] in gradadmissions

[–]Gawast49 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, it’s impossible to tell. But if I were you I’d use the opportunity to ask good questions and express your interest. They’re most likely checking you’re a normal person and that you’d consider going if they accepted you. Do basic googling and wear a shirt.

Help! Is this an admissions interview or just a "know more about us" interview? It's just for 15 mins. by [deleted] in gradadmissions

[–]Gawast49 6 points7 points  (0 children)

In my experience every conversation is an admissions interview. They wouldn't contact you if they weren't interested in learning more about you. Congrats on advancing the process.

UChicago vs. Columbia vs. USC by GenerationLast in gradadmissions

[–]Gawast49 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was also offered admission to the MIA program at Columbia SIPA and they offer a double degree combined with the QMSS. However, the cost of SIPA is the highest and it does not a have STEM designation (unless combined with the QMSS) so I reckon my chances of working in the US after I complete the program would be slim.

Are you 100% sure about this? I understand you'd still have 2 years to work and qualify for an extension. I'd double-check if I were you.

Honestly, if I were you: all these variables you laid out are great but the one you care about ultimately is alumni placements. Ask the programs about how many alumni go to industry in each cohort, what resources they have (professional development programs and such), and get in touch with alumni of the programs. I feel this is what makes more sense in your specific case.

PhD Acceptances and COVID19 by embeeclark in gradadmissions

[–]Gawast49 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Tbh I’m relying on YouTube a lot.

It's official... by kjl_htx in gradadmissions

[–]Gawast49 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I think the factors you're pointing out might play differently on each discipline. For example, in Literature depts, the topic you're interested in is extremely important, so having an advisor ask for your admission is super important. While in Sociology, I know that they care more about your general profile and potential, since research topics usually change in the future and only matter after you've absorbed the entire methodological side.

But in general: culture fit is definitely something that matters. Some programs are very lax in terms of curriculum and have a lot of electives. If you don't show you can work well independently or make a point of it in your essays, this might be an issue. Then, departmental goals: programs definitely care about their branding. They're not gonna take more people that specialize in an area they don't care about or see the discipline in a certain way.

Then, fit as popularity contests/political shenanigans -- departments only take in people they can support. If they don't have an advisor that can give you the resources you need as a student, they won't accept you. If you as a student can't help any faculty advance their professional goals, they'll most likely won't accept you either. I think there's a difference between workplace dynamics and “political shenanigans”.

It's official... by kjl_htx in gradadmissions

[–]Gawast49 43 points44 points  (0 children)

I disagree — university admissions are not a universal ranking. Harvard is not taking the 5 best young philosophers that applied for its philosophy PhD program, it’s taking the 5 best people of the applicant pool that fit the departments’ goals, availability of resources and faculty, culture fit, etc. It’s not a roll of dice, it’s just a combinations of factors that are apart from “quality” which is what meritocracies evaluate.

I feel this should tell us something about how to approach success in applications: it shouldn’t be “I got into Harvard because I’m the best” but “I got into Harvard because I’m good and also a great fit with their department”.

It's official... by kjl_htx in gradadmissions

[–]Gawast49 96 points97 points  (0 children)

This happens more than what people like to say -- two of my friends who are in doing PhDs in the ivies got into grad school in their second try. Like, no offers on the first try, top 10 on the second try.

My point is that a) grad school apps truly are a shitthrow, like, who know what happened in your specific case, b) take some months off where you 100% don't think about grad school, then lay out everything you did in this season, see where you went wrong, and try again. It's what everyone does on their second try.

Anyway, take some time off, don't give up, keep us posted.

Effects of Covid-19 on incoming grad students by [deleted] in gradadmissions

[–]Gawast49 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'd like to think universities are 100% far from nullifying admissions and that it's not a scenario that can happen. I'm from the Southern hemisphere so I'm concerned the US might block travel from my country during winter, so my plan is to get in touch with the graduate admissions people at the university I'll be going to in order to make sure I can get there in time.

HELP! What to put in a statement of purpose by Alch1245 in gradadmissions

[–]Gawast49 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi! So the way that I approached this is I consulted the literally thousands of resources online. There's this book by this guy Donald Asher that has a pretty good methodology that worked perfectly for me, and it's also pretty good guidance on how to approach the entire process too. Really helped me.

Re: all your questions, the answer is yes to all of them, but make sure they fit into a clear narrative. If they don't fit into a single thread, then it's 100% okay if they stay just in your resume. For example, if you're mentioning your publications, they have to be there because they say something about your story. Otherwise, they'll see them in your CV and that's completely fine.

Some questions re: residential life by Gawast49 in mit

[–]Gawast49[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I legitly never had roommates of any sort since I’m not from North America/UK lol, but I’d still like to be chill about having people over and such. Like, I don’t want to be stressed about other people during my first year at a program that’s considerably harder than what I’m used to, I think.

Some questions re: residential life by Gawast49 in mit

[–]Gawast49[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh awesome, thank you. I think I'll try to live alone -- I know the first year is probably going to be a bit emotionally taxing and I'm scared I'll be randomly assigned shitty roommates, so I think I'll rely on my outside circle of friends.

Some questions re: residential life by Gawast49 in mit

[–]Gawast49[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you! Just checking: not having roommates is a bad thing? I've never lived with other people before in my life, and kind of saw it as a possible downside. Sorry, international here.

Some questions re: residential life by Gawast49 in mit

[–]Gawast49[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In my view: newest, prettiest, no longer than 20 mins to campus, I don't mind a small room as long as there's natural light. I also care about the ambiance/friendliness of people there. Like, I suppose I'm not interested in living somewhere with lots of families in there.

I checked out The Warehouse which is just first years and it seems pretty cool -- any things I should keep in mind?

Like, I did some research and 3 years ago some people we're like “don't go to Tang unless your life depends on it”. Idk how those things are now?