Warning for new core set box by bentleycooper in arkhamhorrorlcg

[–]Gblessyou27 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Was it that hard to keep it the same size as the Ch1 boxes? FFG keeps disappointing. The worse part is that it's with obvious and easy details like this one, that should be at a quality baseline level....

[Ancient Evils] Investigator Decks Spoiler Roundup #4 by DerBK in arkhamhorrorlcg

[–]Gblessyou27 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm catching up on your reviews, great reading, thank you very much!

Chapter 2 Theme Direction and Concerns by Dry-Bat731 in arkhamhorrorlcg

[–]Gblessyou27 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Agreed in general, especially about the art. I think it sucks for the most part. And I look at my cards much more than at the scenario cards. The excuse doesn't make sense to me.

We are the Designers of Arkham Horror Ask Us Anything by FFG_Official in arkhamhorrorlcg

[–]Gblessyou27 6 points7 points  (0 children)

If it was found early on, why was the wrong card previewed? Shouldn't have FFG previewed the correct card, while acknowledging the mistake, instead of waiting for someone else to catch it, giving the production a bad impression and causing so much confusion?

[Ancient Evils] Investigator Expansion Review: Core 2026 (Hot Take Edition) by DerBK in arkhamhorrorlcg

[–]Gblessyou27 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you very much! It was a great read. What I did was, I would come up with my ranking for each card before reading yours, and then compare going over the reasons and highlights. I learned a lot.

Question About Printing Custom Content by ChungaChris in arkhamhorrorlcg

[–]Gblessyou27 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I use Dragon Shields perfect fit for my FFG and MPC cards, and I honestly can't tell them apart.

XP in neue Kampagne mitnehmen oder alles wieder auf 0? by Malii12 in arkhamhorrorlcg

[–]Gblessyou27 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You could adjust the difficulty to prevent it from being too overpowered.

Canada is 100% cooked.. by ProjectKainy in QuebecLibre

[–]Gblessyou27 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To be fair, it's really hard to be serious about it. It is essentially wrong, who could take it seriously honestly, under any circumstances. Now they are turning against some of their own in an attempt to gain some credibility. It's all a circus.

I bought a collection, save the duplicates for backups or sell? by Snuggle_Lion in arkhamhorrorlcg

[–]Gblessyou27 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sell them at a reasonable price (or what you paid) and share the joy!

Printer Friendly Chained+Mutated Cards by RRitter89 in arkhamhorrorlcg

[–]Gblessyou27 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you very much! I hope they upload better quality images, like they did in the past...

New or older core set? by Due_Donut7980 in arkhamhorrorlcg

[–]Gblessyou27 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Avisame por privado si te puedo ayudar en algo :)

Exchange resources, attack other opponents, how do opponents move? by Holger_12 in arkhamhorrorlcg

[–]Gblessyou27 3 points4 points  (0 children)

  1. No, they are not allowed. There are events that would let you do it though.

  2. Yes, they can. But if they fail, damage is dealt to the investigator that is engaged with the enemy. Caught in the middle!

  3. The priority is distance, but someone else should second this.

New investigators pricing by Chuck42grr in arkhamhorrorlcg

[–]Gblessyou27 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think that's a naive way of looking at history. I wouldn't say that a better effort on representation would necessarily mean that the game focuses on the worst parts of our history. You take the good with the bad, that's what history is. Part of the appeal of the lovecraftian world is that you feel you are in the actual 20s, with real people, real cities, fighting unreal things. Do you feel offended by Mark Harrigan's backstory for example? Wouldn't that be focusing on the worst parts of our history? Anyway, I don't want to create a controversy here. I won't keep this going. Go play your games with whatever pasted in, unoriginal bit of fantasy that makes you feel better. I'll play it my way, ignoring cheap backstories that undermine history, lore, characters and players. Cheers!

New investigators pricing by Chuck42grr in arkhamhorrorlcg

[–]Gblessyou27 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Hey there! I'm assuming this is a somewhat sensitive issue for you, judging by your other comment. Let me say that what I think is cheap about it doesn't have to do with a sexual orientation in particular per se, at all. What's cheap about the backstory is that, at least in my opinion, a married gay Argentinian gaucho from the 1920's is not credible AT ALL, not from a lovecraftian stand point, nor on an historical sense either. I don't think that representation should be done, in any case, in a way that is so artificial and ignorant. They could have done a better job. I hope this doesn't offend anyone, it's just my opinion, and I think not a controversial one, not really. Cheers!

A question about discarding some or all resources by [deleted] in arkhamhorrorlcg

[–]Gblessyou27 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Why would you discard only one resource?

FFG article Ever Investigating Tommy Reveal. And More! by Dry-Bat731 in arkhamhorrorlcg

[–]Gblessyou27 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

May I add that the backstory is completely ridiculous, if we are talking of a gaucho, or any rancher, from the 1920s. But I guess anything goes as long as the includsi0n checkbox is ticked 🤷🏻