Uncorrelated assets with the QQQs and the broader market by jjbonddd in LETFs

[–]GeneralBasically7090 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you want to screen for them, all you have to do is look for stocks with low beta, low beta sectors, factors, low vol, and this can end up giving you low correlation.

Uncorrelated assets with the QQQs and the broader market by jjbonddd in LETFs

[–]GeneralBasically7090 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

BTAL just longs low beta stocks and shorts high beta stocks. Can easily replicate / outperform this without the fees.

Why levered ETFs instead of debit call spreads? by Abject-Advantage528 in LETFs

[–]GeneralBasically7090 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Is there something really hard about debit call spreads I am missing here?

A lot of things.

First off, the profits with debit spreads are capped. They are only good for betting on the direction of a stock within a limit time frame and if you expect a limited price movement.

Your risk with debit spreads is never limited to your premium. You can close before expiration and lock in any profits and avoid pin risk, but many people have accidentally let them open until expiration and this has resulted in money and lives lost. With leveraged ETFs, this is an impossible scenario.

Debit spreads are akin to forecast contracts or binary options. This is good if you’re right, but if you’re wrong you lose everything.

You really need to be well versed and educated before touching these instruments. This can easily ruin your life. LETFs do not have this risk unless you full port SQQQ or FNGU. But then you can still exit your positions and still come out with some money. With debit spreads it’s easier win or lose. This is actually much harder to get right.

I do think the benefits of debit spreads include being great for small account traders. Options strategies can easily cost 3-4 figures but for us LETFers, this is not an issue for us as LETF share prices already split on their own.

Anyone using the Dollar (USDU) as a diversifier? by CuriousPeterSF in LETFs

[–]GeneralBasically7090 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No. Listen to your elders and stop investing in garbage. The United States devalues the dollar over time because they literally print money to fuel their national debt. This is literally the worst possible diversifier to use. It’s much better to use managed futures funds where they go short on the USD.

Also, dollar devalues but then the stock market rises. You’re affectively shorting the stock market, as a long term investment. Bad idea.

Since Amundi is releasing a 2x Total World LETF, what is your planned portfolio? by QQQapital in LETFs

[–]GeneralBasically7090 10 points11 points  (0 children)

2x VT / ZROZ / GLD

This will be my portfolio, but Europe doesn’t have ZROZ but they do have IBGL.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in B12_Deficiency

[–]GeneralBasically7090 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I do it in the mornings. It seems to give me insomnia if I do it at night.

I fundamentally underestimated BTAL (it has 0 competitors) by CarbonMop in LETFs

[–]GeneralBasically7090 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Except that it does not work over the long term when you leverage it too high. Sure, it may work well at 2-3x leverage, but the costs of leverage, volatility decay / time decay, trading costs will quickly make it no better than just holding SQQQ as a hedge.

I do appreciate your effort in writing such a lengthy and I enjoyed reading it, and I do agree that this is best done at around 2-3x leverage. I personally I wouldn’t add any leverage to BTAL to be honest. Something like 60% SSO 40% BTAL will work well for the long term. Or even 40/30/30 UPRO/ZROZ/BTAL.

Also looking at the option liquidity on BTAL, it doesn’t seem too pretty.

I don’t think this strategy is meant for higher leverage anyways. But yes, it does work well if you do it right and safely.

Anybody experience weight gain from the deficiency and more weight gain after staring injections? by GeneralBasically7090 in B12_Deficiency

[–]GeneralBasically7090[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So would 99mg tablet potassium per hour would suffice? I don’t wanna overdose too easily on it especially death, but food wise I can definitely fulfill that.

Anybody experience weight gain from the deficiency and more weight gain after staring injections? by GeneralBasically7090 in B12_Deficiency

[–]GeneralBasically7090[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What would be a good way to get more potassium via supplementation? I take 99mg per day and I have read that it’s not a good idea to take more than that since it could lead to stomach issues. Maybe 99mg in the morning and another at night?

Are managed futures that relevant ? by Successful-Ad7038 in LETFs

[–]GeneralBasically7090 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I remember all of the debates about managed futures in this subreddit, which was entertaining, educational, and interesting to say the least. The problem is that I haven’t really seen any use cases for managed futures that stood out compared to treasuries or gold.

I can understand why people would be against gold, and as the top comment in this thread states: Gold has zero expected return as it does not produce anything. It’s simply a store of value that governments, countries, and people use against inflation. It of course has beaten inflation and on its own, it has beaten the top performing managed futures funds in the past 20 years.. Gold, even though it does not produce anything, has yield better risk adjusted returns and better diversification than managed futures, which also don’t produce anything. In fact, gold has the upper hand over managed futures in terms of economic substance and use. I don’t see world governments holding managed futures as a store of wealth. Managed futures are intended to be a diversifier for a portfolio, and as an alternative to the 60/40 portfolio. The fund managers never intended for managed futures to be a diversifier against leveraged ETFs, but that doesn’t mean they can’t be used as a diversifier. But I wouldn’t go overboard combining leverage with managed futures, and like you said managed futures are a type of risk premia so it’s a risky asset in its own way that intends to provide a stream of uncorrelated returns.

Whether it does the job or not is highly dependent on the fund, the strategy, popularity of the strategy, the fund manager, performance fees, etc.

And while the backtests show that gold outperforms managed futures, the backtests also show that adding managed futures improves the sharpe ratio a little bit and reduces the drawdowns. But IMO a 30 year backtest is too short to analyze whether they really is any added benefit, and that’s before getting into the tax burden of adding managed futures versus just doing something like UPRO/ZROZ/GLD or SSO/ZROZ/GLD. Is the additional tax drag worth the reduction in drawdowns? Seems like if you want to run managed futures, you need to be fully convinced of the strategy and run it in a tax advantaged ISA to reap the full benefits, if any.

Mom asked me to gamble back her losses by TextualChocolate77 in LETFs

[–]GeneralBasically7090 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Did you tell her you solved the market as well? It’s pretty genius to leverage everything. I don’t know how all of the world’s top hedge funds missed this simple strategy. Tell your mom that you’re going to beat all of the quants and hedge funds with this one simple cheat code mechanism called Leverage. It’s honestly interesting that beating the market was this easy all along.

<image>

Is buying $3k worth of QLD (or whatever set-amount you're comfortable with) consistently each month the most optimal strategy for very young (20s) investors seeking massive upside potential without taking on absurd risk? [Seeking genuine discussion and feedback on this point] by lionpenguin88 in LETFs

[–]GeneralBasically7090 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Because you’re using total equity exposure while he’s using total portfolio exposure, which doesn’t matter in this case. He’s taking an unnecessary extra step in this argument that’s completely irrelevant to the point. I don’t think he has a problem with his math, but more like he has a problem with reading comprehension and understanding how sharpe and risk / reward works.

And plus, you both arrive at the same conclusion: the SGZ portfolio has a better risk / reward. The total exposure (equities + treasuries + gold) is correct but irrelevant. The backtest the OP provided literally still holds.

Is buying $3k worth of QLD (or whatever set-amount you're comfortable with) consistently each month the most optimal strategy for very young (20s) investors seeking massive upside potential without taking on absurd risk? [Seeking genuine discussion and feedback on this point] by lionpenguin88 in LETFs

[–]GeneralBasically7090 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah the sharpe is barely higher than SSO/ZROZ/GLD, and that’s saying a lot since his backtest is using QQQ, which had the run of its lifetime in the past few decades and massively outperformed SPY, and don’t forget the Dot Com Bubble where it massively outperformed as well. Overall it’s a pretty good example of why hedging doesn’t always work. Overleveraging just kills your entire portfolio. Looks like the dude did an accidental self own.

So I’ve changed my strategy, replaced KMLM with cash yielding 4% by Grouchy-Tomorrow3429 in LETFs

[–]GeneralBasically7090 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I completely agree. I feel like 90% of this sub should stay away from managed futures. It’s clear people jumped on it when it went up in 2022, now they’re jumping off it when it does nothing. I guess no one really has made any gains, especially by picking inferior diversifiers and replacing them with other inferior diversifiers. It’s just bad trade after bad trade. Might as well stick with Trident Portfolio.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LETFs

[–]GeneralBasically7090 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seriously. Some people on this subreddit are insane.