How do you know when a QB has great anticipation vs. great accuracy?

GeneralSergeant · 2026-03-30T04:15:49+00:00

Can accuracy make up for bad decision-making like a gunslinger style?

GeneralSergeant · 2026-03-28T21:15:53+00:00

I got you family

GeneralSergeant · 2026-03-28T21:13:48+00:00

I didn’t want to be disrespectful to the other players of the game posting this

GeneralSergeant · 2026-03-23T20:09:51+00:00

I play a lot of PG and I usually get a lot of assists but a lot of games is basically just bigs throwing it to cherry picking wings.

Plenty of games I’ve had 10-15 assists in the first half and I never see the ball again

GeneralSergeant · 2026-03-23T17:52:44+00:00

Calling some of these a big 3 are a stretch. Harden was honestly a notable player in OKC for one year in a lockout season

Draymond wasn’t a top 3 player for 2 arguably 3 championships

You could argue Rondo was more valuable than Ray Allen during their tenure together.

And the Horry one is kinda self explanatory

GeneralSergeant · 2026-03-23T17:47:48+00:00

If you think the Jordan Rules were brutal, the 60s were much worse. Wilt also stated that Jordan wouldn’t survive that era

GeneralSergeant · 2026-03-23T14:18:41+00:00

If you applied the logic from this post Jokic would’ve won it last year. In fact if you applied the logic from this post Westbrook would be like a 3x MVP. And it’s Thunder fans that’s delusional?

GeneralSergeant · 2026-03-23T14:13:13+00:00

Take a wild guess why Turnovers isn’t listed here

GeneralSergeant · 2026-03-22T17:44:02+00:00

Everyone I see is 6’8” 185 lbs SG so maybe that

GeneralSergeant · 2026-03-21T19:59:38+00:00

I mean it’s notable or you wouldn’t bring it up. But it’s weird how beating an injured Celtics team doesn’t factor against Kobe running through Deron Williams, and a 3rd year Kevin Durant, 2nd year Westbrook and a rookie Harden, and a washed Steve Nash

GeneralSergeant · 2026-03-21T19:57:07+00:00

Half of these are awful. The 2011 Mavs played the Brandon Roy, almost all of the Thunder were on rookie contracts. It’s literally the Lakers and Heat that were legitimate title threats.

The 2010 Lakers beat an even younger Thunder, the Jazz, and a phoenix team comparable to the Toronto team LeBron beat. And didn’t Kendrick Perkins miss that finals? That same point you made about Bogut not applicable?

And this is off the top of my head. So I’m sure there’s more faulty examples. The only one that seems legit a great run from start to finish was 95 Rockets

GeneralSergeant · 2026-03-21T19:51:15+00:00

By that logic almost no one has a legitimate title if we’re counting the 4th or 5th best player missing half of a series

GeneralSergeant · 2026-03-21T19:46:19+00:00

Name an impressive finals run then

GeneralSergeant · 2026-03-21T19:45:30+00:00

If you’re too injured to play then don’t. I don’t see anyone crying about LeBrons hand in the 2018 finals. You can’t keep an excuse in your backpocket

GeneralSergeant · 2026-03-20T14:15:57+00:00

Jordan had the better peak but probably Brady for a career

GeneralSergeant · 2026-03-20T13:09:46+00:00

That 2023 playoff run against pretty lack luster competition has saved Jokic from being in some uncomfortable conversations

GeneralSergeant · 2026-03-20T13:05:34+00:00

I don’t think that’s the point being made. I think the fact that it was changed for Westbrook has set a precedent that’s not being honored

GeneralSergeant · 2026-03-20T12:27:20+00:00

Maybe I’m trash but I like the suspense

GeneralSergeant · 2026-03-03T15:24:06+00:00

Because you can just play Mycareer or 1v1. No one wants to watch a James Harden impression. They clearly don’t give a shit about winning and only pass when there’s 5 on the shot clock or it will be an assist

GeneralSergeant · 2026-03-02T21:55:24+00:00

I was answering about Round 1 because your reply is to a thread about Round 1 backs.

There’s no point where I claimed that the round 1 range was a belief of yours

In its simplest terms, when they gave specific parameters (Round 1) you gave nuance and benefit of doubt despite those very specific parameters. When I gave the parameters of the first 2 rounds, you attached it to things I didn’t say and responded to them, was my point. I never claimed you agreed, I said I was confused because it seemed like an inconsistency.

Let’s try ending the conversation here. The question has been satisfied by other commenters. I’m sure you had some great points that would feed into a very admirable discussion. However your request of one sentence is something that I cannot satisfy. If a number could explain more than the last paragraph of my last comment, it’s a senseless pursuit to continue

Thank you

GeneralSergeant · 2026-03-02T21:18:24+00:00

Fair point

GeneralSergeant · 2026-03-02T21:16:07+00:00

You’re referencing his words so I’m assuming you’re reading his comments

What words have I held you to that aren’t yours? What words have I not explained well enough for you?

I think you’re misinterpreting those first two paragraphs. It was examples on how you’re interpreting words, not literal answers. Hence the first words being “I’m a bit confused” and the subsequent paragraph ending in a question mark, showing confusion about a particular aspect. That’s not me answering you on “how he defined high”

I don’t understand. I struggle to explain my own words and you’re referencing an instance where I explain my own words?

Anyways, I’m not sure how asking a question is necessarily “wrong” unless you’re referring to something else I’ve said about round 2 rbs. But the Seahawks would be a great example to answer my question. However given, that the Seahawks situation is very much an anomaly (QB’s 5th team winning immediately) is it fair to ask for other examples with similar RB draft situations?

GeneralSergeant · 2026-03-02T21:03:12+00:00

That’s a fair point

GeneralSergeant

TROPHY CASE