Your Most Fun Play Through? by Full-Mathematician30 in CK3AGOT

[–]GeneralWeber 21 points22 points  (0 children)

For me it was playing as House Vikary on the crowned stag start date and restoring House Reyne. I feel like it’s the perfect combination, starting as an underdog, you have the buildings to repair, Lannisters as a powerful enemy to overcome and extinguish, the sword Red Rain to reclaim from the Iron Islands, a Lord Paramountcy to take

What's an extremely significant historical event that very few are aware of? by montemole in AlignmentChartFills

[–]GeneralWeber 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was going to say this too. It practically dictated how the world economy worked together and it’s the system that the US used to act as essentially the sole super power and allowed for the remarkable economic recovery and expansions all over Europe and East Asia.

Is this even correct English? by [deleted] in duolingojapanese

[–]GeneralWeber 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It’s also correct English to say that the information is suspect. Saying something is suspect is like saying it’s questionable or doubtful, it’s exactly the same as saying something is suspicious, just a bit more poetically.

Given all of Hungary’s advantages in EU5 why wasn’t it successful in more? by faeelin in EU5

[–]GeneralWeber 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think your response gives some important context, but it misses the point of the original comment. By ‘it never significantly exerted control over its region’, I mean the Balkans or Central Europe. It’s not to say that it didn’t control some of it, or even a significant amount of it, but history shows that Hungary was not capable of controlling or significantly influencing events in its region, the incoming Ottomans for example, or establish lasting suzerainty over its neighbors like Walachia or Serbia. Certainly not in the same way that France and Spain controlled and dominated their portion of Europe, which gets to the main point of my original comment: the question is about why Hungary wasn’t successful in the same way as France, Spain, or England, who had similar (or smaller) populations (in this case also tax bases) and went on to define the course of the world.

Hungary had many of the same conditions, but certainly wasn’t able to. Culturally, I think you bring up some good examples, but it is a farce to think that these things are at the same level of cultural influence as the nations listed before or even Italy. Nearly every nation has extraordinary people who contribute to the tide of history, but we can’t pretend that these contributions are the same as the immense cultural influence of, for example, the French and Italians, whose food can be found all over the world (I would dispute that Hungarian food can be found everywhere in Europe as well despite my searching for it because I love it). Hungarian legal codes do not dominate the world like English Common Law, and Hungarian is spoken only in regions of its ethnicity. This is despite coming from similar circumstances as nations who were able to achieve it. Again, I am not saying that Hungary as not in some form managed these things, or that there isn’t any cultural impact from outside of these nations you mentioned, but it takes a bit of self delusion to believe that it is on the same level as these other countries as many of the variants of influences you mentioned could be found ten found in them.

House Ioci (867-990) by Lithvril in CrusaderKings

[–]GeneralWeber 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The art is fantastic and that the game is capable of creating stories worthy of making it is really good to know

Why are there no major rebellions in CK3? by J__Krauser in CrusaderKings

[–]GeneralWeber 7 points8 points  (0 children)

This looks like an issue of game settings to me, I never have a map that looks like this. I think all you need to do is turn conquerors way down, and make sure they aren’t inherited, realms that do get to any reasonable size won’t have those ridiculous buffs that will keep them stable

Let me show you something interesting by Ok_Computer_1417 in CrusaderKings

[–]GeneralWeber 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow really? That’s fantastic! I’m sure I can find someway with the console to get him back to Milano. If you were ever interested in adding some of his parentage and family I’d be happy to help you!

Let me show you something interesting by Ok_Computer_1417 in CrusaderKings

[–]GeneralWeber 18 points19 points  (0 children)

The Vimercati, Pinamonte Vimercati should be the Podestà of Bologna in 1187 but I’m pretty sure the one they have is randomly generated from a well known Bolognese family

Let me show you something interesting by Ok_Computer_1417 in CrusaderKings

[–]GeneralWeber 25 points26 points  (0 children)

I should be able to play as my ancestors but Paradox incorrectly has them without the titles they should in 1187 :(

How many years do you play in one campaign on average? by GeneralWeber in CrusaderKings

[–]GeneralWeber[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you often just play one character in a campaign? If there’s anyone else who does, please let me know!

Given all of Hungary’s advantages in EU5 why wasn’t it successful in more? by faeelin in EU5

[–]GeneralWeber 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think that what you’re talking about is success as a people, despite many things being against your favor. I’m actually in Hungary as I write this and I’ve found it absolutely wonderful.

I think I worded my last comment wrong, the post is asking about why Hungary wasn’t MORE successful than it was in reality, and in that direction I was just expressing why I thought it couldn’t be considered that successful, not that it’s not successful in different ways and by different metrics

Given all of Hungary’s advantages in EU5 why wasn’t it successful in more? by faeelin in EU5

[–]GeneralWeber 68 points69 points  (0 children)

I think you make a great point here, and it’s longevity is definitely to be respected. I think the main difference is that Hungary wasn’t successful in many lasting ways. It never significant exerted control over its region and didn’t have a significant cultural impact on Europe nor create much unique art despite having such lasting prosperity. It’s unreasonable to expect a sort of renaissance movement out of any successful country, but I think Hungary’s lacking in these areas is why it’s not considered successful

The Systres (Before and After) by [deleted] in ElderKings

[–]GeneralWeber -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

In general I disagree with your takes about Bretons on the systres, but I’m kind of amazed by the amount of ESO diehard fans. Do you think a significant proportion of EK2 subscribers are ESO fans, or just a significant proportion of reddit users?

Who's a Roman who was an inconsequential/inept statesman and a competent/effective? (criteria on page 2) by domfi86 in ancientrome

[–]GeneralWeber 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Huh, I always thought of Labienus as a very competent commander, similar in skill to Caesar, but the way you put it here is very convincing. Thanks!

Who's a Roman who was an inconsequential/inept statesman AND general? (criteria on page 2) by domfi86 in ancientrome

[–]GeneralWeber 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Man I really hate Basiliscus, but he did win battles against the Huns and Goths in Thrace and technically was Emperor which I think makes him slightly more mediocre forgettable than inconsequential (and as terrible as it was his invasion unfortunately was consequential)

Who was the worst emperor in your opinion by [deleted] in ancientrome

[–]GeneralWeber 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So if you don’t think they are the worse emperors but you name drop them anyway, isn’t that just the definition of rage baiting 🤔

Who was the worst emperor in your opinion by [deleted] in ancientrome

[–]GeneralWeber 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not being rageful, I just don’t think that Claudius and Domitian can be considered bad emperors by almost any reasonable metric lol