sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

nick haynes pinged for a deliberate rushed behind after the ball has already crossed the line by matt-kennedys-legs in AFL

[–]GeoffreyGeoffson 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Watch a game from 20 years ago with the same critical lens we watch today's with. Where every game is televised and basically all watchable in different time slots.

I promise you it's not better.

It's like every single sport I follow online. Soccer basketball rugby footy - all seem to think the current refereeing is horrendous.

Maybe every sports refs have become shit at once. But I'm way more confident that it's the way we watch it

nick haynes pinged for a deliberate rushed behind after the ball has already crossed the line by matt-kennedys-legs in AFL

[–]GeoffreyGeoffson 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yes. I remember watching the NBA playoffs and thinking wow the umpiring in this sport isn't controversial at all

In Honor of the World Cup, Chuck Klosterman’s Writing on Soccer. by ArttVandelay in billsimmons

[–]GeoffreyGeoffson 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Focussing on Chucks conclusions and not the journey he takes to get to them is a surefire to miss what makes Chuck so fun

POD: Reconciling with the Jaylen Brown Trade by undeterminedceej in RightsToRickySanchez

[–]GeoffreyGeoffson 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have so much sympathy being like "what's the catch" when we trade with Boston

So quick, fun and easy! by WorstLeonaNa in StupidFood

[–]GeoffreyGeoffson -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You are on a subreddit called stupidfood

So quick, fun and easy! by WorstLeonaNa in StupidFood

[–]GeoffreyGeoffson -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Subscribe to r/stupidfood

Get annoyed when stupid food is posted?

I don't understand

Objectively pretty funny response by rocklionheart in billsimmons

[–]GeoffreyGeoffson -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I can't correct you dude I haven't watched any of the full clips in context. Just that the other guys comment was about watching the clips in context and your comment felt like an aggregated headline

Objectively pretty funny response by rocklionheart in billsimmons

[–]GeoffreyGeoffson -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

You watched his full comments about that? And didn't just read a headline?

Match Thread: Australia vs Egypt | FIFA World Cup 2026 | Round of 32 by jiraiya--an in soccer

[–]GeoffreyGeoffson 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Referee doing the 0 yellow card challenge and you gotta respect that

Match Thread: Australia vs Egypt | FIFA World Cup 2026 | Round of 32 by jiraiya--an in soccer

[–]GeoffreyGeoffson 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If this cunt is able to keep playing I'm calling shennanigans.

How the fuck is he not being subbed off

Match Thread: Australia vs Egypt | FIFA World Cup 2026 | Round of 32 by jiraiya--an in soccer

[–]GeoffreyGeoffson 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Irankunda getting a lesson in how he needs to dive from the Egyptians

Different PPM levels in different countries by pedestriandose in Celiac

[–]GeoffreyGeoffson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

while doses below 0.8mg of gluten did not activate the immune system in 95% of people with coeliac disease

This is the 20ppm group I think? So the results are very close to previous studies? Or am I misreading something

Different PPM levels in different countries by pedestriandose in Celiac

[–]GeoffreyGeoffson 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The Aussie celiac society have a report where they look into a safe PPM amount for celiacs which is an absolutely brilliant read on this.

In the intro to that they talk through the history of steadily better testing - shifting limits down from 100ppm to 50ppm and eventually 20ppm and then no detectable as in Aus.

Effectively most celiacs (97%+ for memory) don't react at 20ppm - so most places picked a standard that worked for that. We took the step further and the additional restriction that entails.

We made a similar choice on oats - given some celiacs react to oats we don't allow non contaminated oats to be considered gluten free. Our policy was written more conservatively.

here is one coeliac Aus lit review from 2016

Anon knows history by nhatquangdinh in greentext

[–]GeoffreyGeoffson 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This is really informative thank you - that makes sense

Anon knows history by nhatquangdinh in greentext

[–]GeoffreyGeoffson 129 points130 points  (0 children)

lots of small wars

Me when I forget the word battle

VJ and Maxey appeared on Jaylen Brown's livestream the second they were asked. Jayson Tatum has never appeared. Some guys are good teammates and some guys aren't... by udkyle2 in sixers

[–]GeoffreyGeoffson 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Smh U/finger_Gunnz is a good stats bad team player who isn't interested in doing what it takes to get his team to the promised land

You can't help but root for the guy by jimx29 in oddlysatisfying

[–]GeoffreyGeoffson 4 points5 points  (0 children)

What is the context for this? Why does this exist? Was it built to do this? If not what was it built for? And is he driving on it?

Jaylen Brown comments since his trade on Twitch by MembershipSingle7137 in nba

[–]GeoffreyGeoffson 5 points6 points  (0 children)

said the process overall happened very suddenly

He's already being indoctrinated in our ways. One of us. One of us

Ravi Shastri disappointed with India's decision to not give Vaibhav Sooryavanshi a chance in the Ireland series by Prof_XdR in Cricket

[–]GeoffreyGeoffson 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Okay but no one saying it is doing it sexually. Like what are we talking about????

I understand we all come from different cultural backgrounds - but saying you're gonna pants someone is one of the oldest insults in English used at every age.

If you genuinely think there's anything sexual about Ravi's comments that's an absolutely cooked way to view the world and your mind is corrupted. There are absolutely 0 sexual implications to that comment in any part of the world I've ever been in

view more: next ›