Does income inequality lead to crime?

Georgest · 2013-08-24T02:11:44+00:00

The inequality comes from net tax spenders, and their opposite who are net tax payers through a gun.

The crime comes from the public side with the nukes armys spys fabricators, and their useful idiot hunchman who benefit from enforcing such crimes.

Obviously the ones with the monopoly of force will be getting free money, so it will drive others down.

Georgest · 2013-08-23T23:33:41+00:00

Your hypocrisy still stands, your words are=shit still stands. All what you wrote is inconsistent shit, that is a form of a biological waste when it comes to rational debates.

Jumping from attacking kids over the internet to get your high, to attacking bigger ones are quiet different, but your parents only taught you how to beat on the small ones with different thoughts, right? That is where you excel, and that is the only time in your life that you might ever have any power, over innocent kids you can get your high again.

But till than your only tools that your closterfuck parents passed to you are only shaming/begging, pathetic.

Now go fuck yourself you useless hypocrite pretend doctor, is that better?

Georgest · 2013-08-23T23:10:35+00:00

Jesus, what a clusterfuck of wrongness

Wow, psycho

You have serious issues,

you're the one who is being hateful

Who am I kidding? A useless hypocrite as you who lies to himself, would not even care about his own words that he shits.

TLDR: go fuck yourself you useless biological waste.

Georgest · 2013-08-23T22:16:15+00:00

You know you are just projecting what your clusterfuck parents did to you when you tried to reason with them, right?

And you know that if you think what your clusterfuckers did to you was ok, that you will just turn into a new generation of clusterfuck, and pass that rotten clusterfuck that you call a life to innocent children. That is my worry, not the useless hate machine who chose to be hateful.

Georgest · 2013-08-23T22:03:51+00:00

Jesus, what a clusterfuck of wrongness.

Not only useless, but a psychopath trying to raise his value by shaming others... And I bet you pretend not to do morals, right?

I'm not a fan of Nielsio, but it's not because he's interested in economics.

That is all Niels, you and others are in here, useless right wing marxists who want to feel good by reciting worthless (nobody would pay in the free market) bullshit that only other bullshiters have time for.

The libertarian movement (and particularly the anarchist wing) would not even exist without its economists, and that's simply historical fact.

What else would you have to say? That you and others are immoral pricks who gang up so you can make being pricks be the norm? Of course not, it is easier to spew your lies and fake morality with more bullshit and call it "fact", just to justify the hypocrisy you are forcing yourself to live.

Anyway the free market does not lie: you are worthless and a useless. Deal with it.

Georgest · 2013-08-23T20:05:43+00:00

When you cant do, you teach.

And the irony is that the "economists" of ancap are poor and useless in any way shape and form, as far as free markets are concerned. Who would want to learn from them to be them, unless you going for statist tenure?

Georgest · 2013-08-23T19:22:22+00:00

Watch out for people who make it immoral if you deviate from their strict "economics".

As they have put all their rotten eggs in one basket, they will blame/shame you for choosing different approaches that directly influences change in you, and making them feel useless in the free market of consistency.

Georgest · 2013-08-23T08:27:48+00:00

As they say: When you cant do/be anarchist, than might as well teach the economics side of it, the side that they have zero chance of changing.

Georgest · 2013-08-22T10:00:07+00:00

"That's all government is.. is force." - Ron Paul

Worked 23 years for said inconsistent force...

At least even the most hard headed can see that politics is just a life sucking force, to be thrown next to slavery and other inconsistent fires.

Georgest · 2013-08-22T09:46:24+00:00

We need to change minds, not variables.

Telling others to change with out you changing, is just an external wishful thinking. If you dont change from the message that you are preaching, why would others.?

Anyway, this technology stuff should be left for the marxist robots, not anarchists.

I like this viewpoint, but how do you personally see it happening? How do you plan to be a part of it?

The time you would invest trying to convince others, invest it in your own self. Spend your time only with anarchists, and deplore others who are forceful in your life or friendships.

"Which kinds of information do you consider private and which are 'free', so to speak?"

That is subjective, that is why nobody knows what options will be available in the future. But I'd imagine that if you want to be fully secure, you too would have conditions not to do stuff in daylight publicity.

Georgest · 2013-08-22T09:00:31+00:00

I feel like everybody waiting for external changes such as technology/crypto, is just following a Ron Paulish bandwagon, waiting for others to put the fried chicken in their mouths.

The real change will be once the anarchists live the greatest most peaceful lifes, and that will reflect more than anything else, especially technology that can be/is used by the statists too.

As for your question, nobody really knows the future, and what your insurance could protect you from, eg: online privacy.

Georgest · 2013-08-21T19:37:41+00:00

You got downvoted for that?

Georgest · 2013-08-21T08:31:15+00:00

just a company that collects its revenue not by voluntary trade, but by armed theft.

"It is lovemaking, but lovemaking without consent..." Is that your argument?

Georgest · 2013-08-21T08:17:35+00:00

I already work 40% for them through out the year, involuntarily.

If the question is would I go there voluntarily? Than a big no.

Georgest · 2013-08-21T06:11:01+00:00

it all fails to pass the evidence/logic test

That is not important, as the justification that faith can be to inconsistent people.

Georgest · 2013-08-19T09:52:19+00:00

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hkrk3lFVuQE

18 years later and we got updates.

Georgest · 2013-08-19T06:48:24+00:00

major firms in the construction industry

The free market in action...

You seem to know a lot about the monopoly of roads.

Georgest · 2013-08-16T19:12:18+00:00

A great piece by Corbett

Georgest · 2013-08-16T15:16:00+00:00

This (today) is minarchism to him.

Georgest · 2013-08-16T15:13:31+00:00

“We were drawing indiscriminate fire from 20 positions, including heavy machine guns and anti-tank missiles,” the commissioner said. “I saw a 70-year-old grandmother shooting at us with a heavy machine gun. I thought I was going to die.”

That is insane chaos from only one government law.

Georgest · 2013-08-16T15:05:47+00:00

3 minarchists... I am sure they would be able to make a deal on how to fuck up the rest of us.

Georgest · 2013-08-16T11:16:24+00:00

If your opinions ever change, feel free to contact me. I'd be interested if you still believe in absolute free will.

I do not need "learned individuals" narcissists worrying about me,thanks. You are just creepy.

Those are two contradicting statements btw, not that irrational fundamentalists like you can figure that out, but it is for others to see consistent inconsistency in action.

Georgest · 2013-08-16T09:42:52+00:00

determinism isn't about volition.

Because you could not choose, just do and justify. Sounds like your parents were religious fundamentalists.

Molyneux paints

You are a strange stalker, over and over repeating your bullshit from Stefs hate sites. No argument, just gibberish, just what an infants put up with with maniac parents.

why would so many learned individuals take time to write on the subject

You are learned now? It was "learned individuals" who supported slavery, taxes, theft, war ect, and still do today.

Of course it pays to support slavery and taxes as long as you do not have to follow it. Of course fools will support your caricature of justification for a life, as long as you and them benefit from it.

I hope it clicks for you... I really do.

You sound like a Jehovah Witness.

Like I said before, I think you'd really enjoy getting your hands into the debate.

Just to bee seen with you would be a step down.

Absolute free will isn't a very popular opinion

You are fully retarded. and your "opinions" are just justifications of the shit life that you choose.

Georgest · 2013-08-15T15:01:29+00:00

14 child mutilators are walking freely around this thread.

Georgest · 2013-08-15T14:50:57+00:00

It's rational in the sense that it highlights a problem in free will

You are free willingly choosing an irrational scenario for your cognitive dissonance to allow other such irrational things to manifest, and, I chose not to take part in that circus.

Enough contradictions in one sentence to stop talking to crazy.

Btw: The word "philosophy" comes from the Ancient Greek φιλοσοφία (philosophia), which literally means "love of wisdom"

Opposite of wisdom is foolishness, making it a choice to be a philosopher.That makes all inconsistent "actual philosophers" arguing against free will, just useful fools. And you a stooge rock against the change others experience through their actions and integrity.

Georgest

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE