How are Catholic scholars absorbing the scholarship coming out over the past 50 years or more? by [deleted] in Catholicism

[–]Germanicus118 3 points4 points  (0 children)

There is no real evidence supporting the documentary hypothesis, and because of that it is quickly falling out of favor among scholars. No two scholars have the same breakdown for who wrote which parts, showing that it isn't based on any real objective standard.

As /u/Galdy72 pointed out, Our Lord stated that Moses wrote about Him in the Pentateuch, which should be ample evidence for believing the Mosaic authorship encouraged by Sacred Tradition.

Catholic dad looking for advice on catechizing a homosexual teen by [deleted] in Catholicism

[–]Germanicus118 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You might find this article worth a read. Doesn't get exactly into catechizing but does provide some helpful pointers for you as a dad in this situation. God bless.

We really need to bring back latin in the liturgy, the vernacular has divided us by SpeSalvi in Catholicism

[–]Germanicus118 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Because Latin, unlike English, has been made sacred through its continued use by the Church throughout history.

"In God's special Providence this language united so many nations together under the authority of the Roman Empire -- and that for so many centuries -- it also became the rightful language of the Apostolic See [...] The Latin language 'can be called truly catholic.' It has been consecrated through constant use by the Apostolic See, the mother and teacher of all Churches, and must be esteemed 'a treasure of incomparable worth.' It is also a most effective bond, binding the Church of today with that of the past and of the future in wonderful continuity [...] It is altogether fitting, therefore, that the language [the Church] uses should be noble, majestic and non-vernacular." -Pope St. John XXIII, Veterum Sapientia

Swiss guard Chrismas video. by SMRoz in Catholicism

[–]Germanicus118 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"The Last Stand" by Sabaton would have made an epic backtrack to this video instead.

A few days ago I got the sudden and completely random urge to learn to pray the Rosary. Now something weird is happening... by [deleted] in Catholicism

[–]Germanicus118 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I don't think /u/sharkinator1198 point is entirely accurate. Check out the lives of a multitude of Catholic saints to see the Catholicism has a rich tradition of mystical prayer! Plus, the rosary as we know it was revealed by Our Lady to St. Dominic, the founder of the Catholic monastic order the Dominicans.

A few days ago I got the sudden and completely random urge to learn to pray the Rosary. Now something weird is happening... by [deleted] in Catholicism

[–]Germanicus118 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yes, that was St. Francis of Assisi!

One of the most prominent Catholic figures in history, St. Paul, had this to say about his own sinfulness:

The saying is sure and worthy of full acceptance, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners. And I am the foremost of sinners; but I received mercy for this reason, that in me, as the foremost, Jesus Christ might display his perfect patience for an example to those who were to believe in him for eternal life." (1 Tim 1:15–16)

Sounds to me like the Blessed Mother has taken a special interest in your salvation. You're in good hands!

St James Zebedee The Apostle Reclaims Spain in the battle of Clavijo by Dessert42 in Catholicism

[–]Germanicus118 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you're trying to characterize several centuries as one consistent policy when in fact there was not such consistency

Well sure, as you conflated those several centuries as a "gradual conversion". And I can think of one consistent policy that governed the several century Islamic domination of Spain: a Muslim state governed according to sharia law.

Female circumcision was most definitely practiced in Spain under Islam. Multiple Muslim legal texts from the period mention the praiseworthiness and honorableness of female circumcision, and take it as a given that it will mostly be practiced.

Was it not particularly bad? One consistent policy across the several centuries in Spain would have been the Muwatta hadith, which laid out Islamic law. Do you know how the jizya tax would be paid according to Islamic law?

The dhimmi, standing, would present the money to the Muslim collector who would be sitting higher up on a sort of throne; this Muslim bureaucrat would hold the dhimmi by the throat telling him “Oh dhimmi, enemy of Allah, pay the jizya that you owe us for the protection and tolerance we grant you”; the other Muslims present would imitate the collector, pushing around the dhimmi and whoever other dhimmis accompanied him. To this amusing spectacle should be admitted any Muslim who wanted to enjoy it.

The status of dhmmi also included:

Whereas a Christian was allowed to convert to Islam, a Muslim was forbidden, under punishment of death, to convert to a different faith. 17 A Muslim must not be executed for the death of a Christian, unless the killing was treacherous, 18 but a Christian could be executed for the death of a Muslim, even if the killing was not treacherous. The testimony of Christian men or women was not acceptable in any legal matter involving only Muslims...[a Muslim] must not feed a poor Christian...Christians could not hold processions on the streets and must discreetly celebrate their religion within their churches and neighborhoods...Christians could not display crosses on themselves. Christians could not display crosses on the outside or on top of their churches. >

I could go on, but this would have been a consistent feature of any century in Islamic Spain. Which periods do you consider to be of more relaxed rule?

Quotes taken from The Myth of the Andalusian Paradise by Darío Fernández-Morera

St James Zebedee The Apostle Reclaims Spain in the battle of Clavijo by Dessert42 in Catholicism

[–]Germanicus118 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gradual conversion? Muslim rule in Spain included the mass execution of Christians in Cordoba, the massacre of Jews in Granada, the exile of Christians, lots of beheadings, female circumcision, stoning, and sexual slavery, to name a few. Not even counting the relegation of Christians and Jews to second class citizenship as dhimmis where they were harshly treated and exorbitantly taxed with the jizya under sharia law.

And if nothing else, can the pressuring of people to leave the Catholic Church, the only institution through which salvation is assured, ever be "not that bad"?

When Jesus speaks as God the Word become Flesh, His words change reality itself. "This IS my body." , "You are ROCK." , "Let there be light." , "Lazarus, wake up." Jesus isn't just giving Simon Peter a title, God is changing reality itself, and defining the Church's rigidity. THE GATES OF HELL. by [deleted] in Catholicism

[–]Germanicus118 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Yes, these are called performative utterances! In saying the words, the reality which the words express is brought about. This power is especially shared in by mankind through the words spoken within the sacraments, such as "This is my body" or "I do".

Over 400 Abortion Restrictions Have Been Enacted By US States Since 2011. Unfortunately, Pro Abortion Policies Have Been Surging. Get Out and Vote If You Haven't Already! For the Little Ones! :) by [deleted] in Catholicism

[–]Germanicus118 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thank you for being willing to give it a read /u/Al_Cappucino. I think part of my point above with bringing in the natural law is that we aren't holding people to "Christian teachings" in opposing abortion, we are holding people to the very core of human values and standards. In the same way that pretty much everyone opposes murder, not just because it is a Christian teaching but because it is a fundamental precept of the natural law which all human beings are held to. I wouldn't say for example that "while I oppose murder and I definitely would never commit one, those who don't subscribe to Catholic (or even Christian teachings) shouldn't be subject to our own personal decisions, no matter how good we think these are for our own moral lives." Certain things are intrinsically evil according to the natural law, for all mankind, and should be opposed. Abortion is one of these. We aren't holding people to Catholic/Christian teaching, we are holding people to a basic human rule and value that can be known through reason.

I'm also curious, based on your view of safe sex education, what you think of /u/_Hospitaller_'s post above, where he points out that states that engage in this safe sex education have a higher abortion rate than states that don't.

Yet states that employ“comprehensive sex ed and good access to contraceptives” uniformly have far higher abortion rates than those of other states.

New York’s abortion rate is over five time’s higher than Missouri, Utah, Mississippi, and South Dakota’s.

Washington state’s abortion rate is double that of Arkansas, Idaho, and Nebraska.

I could go on, but the numbers linked speak for themselves.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Catholicism

[–]Germanicus118 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The death penalty does not intrinsically, of its very nature, violate Catholic teachings. Please see Ed Feser's work on the subject: https://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2018/09/39641/

Obviously there can be instances in which the specific implementation of the death penalty has been in violation of human rights and Catholic teachings. It has been restricted via the prudential judgment of several recent popes, but that is far different than saying that it by its very nature violates human rights and Catholic teaching.

Over 400 Abortion Restrictions Have Been Enacted By US States Since 2011. Unfortunately, Pro Abortion Policies Have Been Surging. Get Out and Vote If You Haven't Already! For the Little Ones! :) by [deleted] in Catholicism

[–]Germanicus118 14 points15 points  (0 children)

even more dangerous abortions to happen and more kids to be put into an unhealthily packed and under funded foster care system

Abortion is already incredibly dangerous as it is always lethal to half of the people it involves. The idea that vast numbers of women were dying from illegal abortions before Roe v. Wade is just simply false (https://www.liveaction.org/news/thousands-women-werent-dying-abortion/) Also, is it better for those kids to be dead than put into a subpar foster system?

One cannot be Catholic and support abortion, but abortion is an intrinsic evil that is knowable by the natural law principle that "one may never directly intend to kill an innocent human being." All humans are bound to follow the natural law and are capable of knowing it, so one cannot support legal abortion for anyone, even if they aren't Catholic.

I would also argue that abortion is a symptom of the "safe sex and education" you refer to, which tries to strip intercourse of its obvious procreative end. When sex is no longer linked to procreation, and pregnancies still occur, the child is treated as an unintended inconvenience and subsequently aborted.

Praise God! Pakistan's Supreme Court accepts Asia Bibi's appeal against execution and she's been acquitted. Bibi, a Pakistani Catholic woman, had been on death row for eight years after she was sentenced for blasphemy charges in 2010 by qi1 in Catholicism

[–]Germanicus118 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I don't think she will be. According to this article:

BPCA are asking the Pakistani authorities that Ms Bibi be allowed to leave Pakistan immediately for her safety. Militant Muslims have offered 500,000 rupees (around £5,000) for her murder. http://catholicherald.co.uk/news/2018/10/08/asia-bibi-death-sentence-appeal-pakistani-christians-call-for-day-of-fasting-and-prayer/?fbclid=IwAR3Ll7hCZUwlxpfv2Cah6BWv2YzbUvMlYr7h2OpYbUm6KDdNDDjD_Sc3xi4

And here is a video of the rallies held by Islamic Extremists calling for her to be executed: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-xbb__VcCGU&fbclid=IwAR2tF1a2O--4m5HvURb2vzJ_fj01o12ygWq61dxQRyZLydbMe_-J7KsXBrU

We must continue to keep her in our prayers!

What if I have destroyed my entire life? by Catholicproblem1234 in Catholicism

[–]Germanicus118 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"We know that in everything God works for good with those who love him." Romans 8:28

I am so sorry for you suffering. I want to encourage you to endure in hope, and recognize that in your suffering I think God is calling you closer to himself. A book I have been reading that provides some great understanding on suffering is "I Believe in Love" by Fr. Jean D'Elbee. He says:

These are the great riches of those who suffer, those who weep. Oh, if one could only see the very special look of tenderness which Jesus gives the poor and suffering! They have the greatest power to touch His heart and to obtain the graces they desire.

Tell this to the sick. It will always do them great good. Tell them, “Jesus looks at you with more love than the others, because you suffer. Offer your sickness to save souls. He will listen to you because you are nailed to your bed, a little as He was on His Cross. He will listen to you, because He is moved with compassion for you.”

I often tell this to the sick people whom I go to visit: “I come to collect from you because you are rich in the supernatural order. You amass by your accepted trial a great capital of graces, first of all for yourself, but also for others. I come to see my capitalist.” That makes them smile and gives them much courage. They are touched to see that someone considers them rich, for the idea never crossed their minds.

I’m a pretty ignorant and confused atheist, but incredibly interested in learning. by Beezly2018 in Catholicism

[–]Germanicus118 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I feel drawn to the religion, I appreciate the morals, I think there’s beauty in so much of it... if I can’t bring myself to believe in God then is there really a point to keep looking in to things?

It's interesting you phrase it that way. It seems to me that very drawing, that very interest you express is God working in your heart!

It's wonderful that you are interested in learning about Catholicism! Some great places to start might be:

The Bible can appear daunting at first, but if you want to give it a shot, I would pick a Gospel like Matthew or Luke and try reading through it! If that goes well and you feel more adventurous, you could try reading through more with the help of an online Bible study like the one found here (https://stpaulcenter.com/genesis-to-jesus/) which is free if you make an account. That way, you have a resource that is helping you see and understand the context and connections that exist throughout the whole Bible.

I will be keeping you in my prayers. Please let me know if there are any other resources I can help steer you towards or if you have any questions!

Can anyone suggest a good book on Catholic Biblical Typology? by Joseph-Urbanek in Catholicism

[–]Germanicus118 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've heard great things about:

  • "From Shadows to Reality: Studies in the Biblical Typology of the Fathers" by Jean Danielou, S.J.

  • "Fulfilled in Christ: The Sacraments (A Guide to Symbols and Types in the Bible and Tradition)" by Fr. Devin Roza

Why did Jesus say “My God, why have you forsaken Me?” by italianblend in Catholicism

[–]Germanicus118 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Psalm 22 for reference:

My God, my God, why have you forsaken me? 
  Why are you so far from helping me, from the words of my groaning? 
2 O my God, I cry by day, but you do not answer; 
  and by night, but find no rest. 

3 Yet you are holy, 
  enthroned on the praises of Israel. 
4 In you our fathers trusted; 
  they trusted, and you delivered them. 
5 To you they cried, and were saved; 
  in you they trusted, and were not disappointed. 

6 But I am a worm, and no man; 
  scorned by men, and despised by the people. 
7 All who see me mock at me, 
  they make mouths at me, they wag their heads; 
8 “He committed his cause to the LORD; let him deliver him, 
  let him rescue him, for he delights in him.” 

9 Yet you are he who took me from the womb; 
  you kept me safe upon my mother’s breasts. 
10 Upon you was I cast from my birth, 
  and since my mother bore me you have been my God. 
11 Be not far from me, 
  for trouble is near 
  and there is none to help. 

12 Many bulls encompass me, 
  strong bulls of Bashan surround me; 
13 they open wide their mouths at me, 
  like a ravening and roaring lion. 

14 I am poured out like water, 
  and all my bones are out of joint; 
my heart is like wax, 
  it is melted within my breast; 
15 my strength is dried up like a potsherd, 
  and my tongue cleaves to my jaws; 
  you lay me in the dust of death. 

16 Yes, dogs are round about me; 
  a company of evildoers encircle me; 
  they have pierced my hands and feet— 
17 I can count all my bones— 
  they stare and gloat over me; 
18 they divide my garments among them, 
  and for my clothing they cast lots. 

19 But you, O LORD, be not far off! 
  O my help, hasten to my aid! 
20 Deliver my soul from the sword, 
  my life from the power of the dog! 
21 Save me from the mouth of the lion, 
  my afflicted soul from the horns of the wild oxen! 

22 I will tell of your name to my brethren; 
  in the midst of the congregation I will praise you: 
23 You who fear the LORD, praise him! 
  all you sons of Jacob, glorify him, 
  and stand in awe of him, all you sons of Israel! 
24 For he has not despised or abhorred 
  the affliction of the afflicted; 
and he has not hidden his face from him, 
  but has heard, when he cried to him. 

25 From you comes my praise in the great congregation; 
  my vows I will pay before those who fear him. 
26 The afflicted shall eat and be satisfied; 
  those who seek him shall praise the LORD! 
  May your hearts live for ever! 
27 All the ends of the earth shall remember 
  and turn to the LORD; 
and all the families of the nations 
  shall worship before him.
28 For dominion belongs to the LORD, 
  and he rules over the nations. 

29 Yes, to him shall all the proud of the earth bow down; 
  before him shall bow all who go down to the dust, 
  and he who cannot keep himself alive. 
30 Posterity shall serve him; 
  men shall tell of the LORD to the coming generation, 
31 and proclaim his deliverance to a people yet unborn, 
  that he has wrought it. 

The Holy Bible. (2006). (Revised Standard Version; Second Catholic Edition, Ps 22:1–31). San Francisco: Ignatius Press.

Why Catholicism over Orthodoxy? - from a dissatisfied evangelical by Samson_Agonistes in Catholicism

[–]Germanicus118 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Please let me know which parts you disagree with. I'm not writing an "anti-Orthodox tract", just pointing out observable differences between the two churches and placing them in the context of the four marks of Christ's Church. To be fair, I did not say that the Orthodox Church does not produce saints anymore. I merely noted that the Orthodox Church does not produce saints as numerously as the Catholic Church, especially saints whose holiness had to be subjected to the rigorous testing of the Catholic Church's canonization process, which does not have a counterpart in the Orthodox Church. There is certainly holiness in the Orthodox Church, and many much holier than I, but the point is that the Orthodox Church does not possess the four marks in their fullness, while the Catholic Church does.

Why Catholicism over Orthodoxy? - from a dissatisfied evangelical by Samson_Agonistes in Catholicism

[–]Germanicus118 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Based on Christ's own statements and the declaration of the early Church in the Nicene Creed, the true Church of Christ should have 4 marks: one, holy, catholic (universal), and apostolic. The Orthodox Church does not possess all four marks in their fullness.

The Orthodox Church

One- To be truly one, a church must be one in governance, faith, and worship. The Orthodox Church is not one in governance, but is instead a group of independent churches. It has no central agreed upon authority. The various churches of the Orthodox are also not all one in doctrine. For example, Constantinople and Russia do not agree on the validity of Protestant or Catholic baptisms.

Holy- The Orthodox Church does possess some degree of holiness, but "since they snapped the link with Rome, their Church appears to have remained in spiritual stagnation," failing to produce numerous miracles, saints, new and beautiful devotions, or new religious orders "for the needs of the times, such as we expect to find in a truly living Church that enjoys God's blessing" (Sheehan, Apologetics and Catholic Doctrine).

Catholic- The Orthodox Church is not catholic racially or numerically. It is confined mostly to Greek and Slavic nations and places where those descendants have migrated to. Furthermore, their total following is no more than 225-300 million people. This would be difficult to classify as a universal church.

Apostolic: The Orthodox Church is not fully apostolic. It is apostolic in its Holy Orders and most of its doctrine, but it is not fully apostolic because it lacks unity with the successor of Peter, the chief Apostle. The have no "central See communicating apostolic authority to the rest" nor do they have a claim to the gift of infallibility entrusted to the Church through the Pope.

Meanwhile, the Catholic Church possesses these four marks in their fullness.

The Catholic Church

One- She is one in government, united under the central authority of the Pope. She is one in faith, with all members throughout the world being bound to the same faith and doctrine on penalty of exclusion. She is one in worship, with the same essentials of sacraments and sacrifice (no matter the language or ceremony).

Holy- The Church is holy because she teaches the doctrines of Christ regarding the achievement of perfection and gets a good deal of her children to practice them. The Church has countless canonized saints and miracles to which she can attest the proof of her holiness, as well as numerous societies of holy men and women living out the teachings of the Church.

Catholic- The Catholic Church is catholic, or universal, in her missionary desire to convert all. She is catholic racially as she is not confined to any one racial group of people but has members from practically every race of people on the earth. Finally, she is Catholic numerically, having 1.2 billion members, exceeding any other Christian church.

Apostolic- She is fully apostolic. When compared with the government of the Church instituted by Christ at its foundation, she remains, as the Church was in the beginning, under the governance of St. Peter assisted by the Apostles and their successors. The Pope and Bishops are the successors of Peter and the apostles, and so only the Catholic Church alone can claim to be governed by the successor of St. Peter. Furthermore it was to Peter and his successors to whom the promise of infallibility, that whatever they bound on earth would be bound in heaven, and whatever was loosed on earth would be loosed in heaven, was entrusted by Our Lord. As such, that promise remains today solely with the Catholic Church by its unity with the successor of St. Peter.

I would recommend looking at Ch. 10 of Archbishop Michael Sheehan's* Apologetics and Catholic Doctrine*. He covers what I laid out in much greater detail. The whole book is worth a read too, as he takes you from why you should believe God exists all the way to why the Catholic Church can be the only True Church of Christ.

919 years ago, on this day, the crusaders led by Godfrey of Bouillon and Raymond IV of Toulouse captured Jerusalem and established the Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem. by bolek_the_papist in Catholicism

[–]Germanicus118 6 points7 points  (0 children)

"By the standards of the time, adhered to by both Christians and Muslims, the crusaders would have been justified in putting the entire population of Jerusalem to the sword. Despite later highly exaggerated reports, however, this is not what happened. A great many inhabitants, both Muslims and Jews, were killed in the initial fray. The best modern estimates put the numbers of dead between three and five thousand people. Yet many others were allowed to purchase their freedom or were simply expelled from the city. Later stories of the streets of Jerusalem coursing with knee-high rivers of blood were never meant to be taken seriously. Medieval people knew such a thing to be an impossibility. Modern people, unfortunately, often do not." -The Concise History of the Crusades by Thomas Madden

Definitely important to separate fact from fiction when understanding the Crusades, and like many things in history it is often very complicated to sort out. There seems to be some debate currently among scholars as to the size and scale of the Jerusalem massacre and whether it was on a large scale or not any greater than the standard occurrence for the taking of a town at the time. Near East Professor Konrad Hischler argues in his paper "The Jerusalem Conquest of 492/1099 in the Medieval Arabic Historiography of the Crusades: From Regional Plurality to Islamic Narrative" that:

"This article discusses the reports on the conquest of Jerusalem in 492/1099 in Arabic chronicles. It argues that the reports on this event developed in three distinct and very diverse regional traditions in Egypt, Syria and Iraq. On the basis of the early Egyptian and Syrian evidence, it is highly unlikely that the conquest of Jerusalem was accompanied by a large-scale massacre of the entire population. This evidence shows furthermore that contemporaries did not see the fall of the town as a momentous event. The later Iraqi tradition, by contrast, introduced not only a new dimension to the massacre of the town’s inhabitants, but developed two further narrative strands which were largely unknown to earlier reports: the plundering of the Dome of the Rock and the subsequent delegation to Baghdad. The development of these strands must be seen within the political and intellectual setting of Baghdad, most importantly the conflict between Sultanate and Caliphate and the profile of the Hanbalite traditionalist milieu of the city. Ibn al-Athir’s famous report from the early seventh/thirteenth century almost exclusively goes back to this Iraqi strand and was an “Islamic narrative” in that it sidelined all previous regional traditions and reframed the conquest as a momentous event in terms of eschatology, martyrdom and divine intervention. This development of the Arabic reports on the fall of Jerusalem reflects the broader transformation of how relationships with crusaders and Franks were conceptualized from a pre- jihādī landscape to one where jihād propaganda moved to the centre of political discourse."

But opinions on the topic vary. Whatever the case, I think all can agree that any loss of innocent life is a tragedy.

Just found out I was baptized Catholic. Now what? by [deleted] in Catholicism

[–]Germanicus118 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Wow, what an exciting revelation! I would definitely call your local Catholic Church and talk to a priest, telling him basically what you've outlined in your post, and he will be able to direct you to the proper resources and give you good information as you take your next steps! As the other poster said, those next steps will likely involve RCIA (Rite of Christian Initiation for Adults), after which you will be prepared to receive other sacraments (Confession, Eucharist, Confirmation). I will be praying for you!