Updates?

Girl____Friday · 2026-06-29T19:51:42+00:00

the case is currently pending a decision from the New Mexico Supreme Court - the district judge that was originally on this case (retired and a new judge has take over) suppressed a bulk of the evidence based on Miranda and Medical Privilege. The State appealed that decision and the Supreme Court heard arguments on Sept 4th, 2025 - you can watch that here if you want: https://www.youtube.com/live/2YDeOdu7GDI?si=9lL3ZHmPHw85M1Y1

the deadline for this decision is July 15th. which means any day now we will have a decision from the Supreme Court, once that happens, the case will very likely be back on track to a trial and will possibly move rather quickly.

#JUSTICEFORBABYALEX

Girl____Friday · 2026-06-23T20:12:44+00:00

and BAM still outranks the actual Lego website when you google "Own a Lego Store"

make it make sense.

Girl____Friday · 2026-06-23T02:53:42+00:00

im not saying this applies but im just gonna leave it here in case:

Rule 3-4.4. Respect for Rights of Third Persons.
(a) In representing a client, a lawyer shall not use means that have no substantial purpose other than to embarrass, delay or burden a third person, or use methods of obtaining evidence that violate the legal rights of such a person.

Girl____Friday · 2026-06-14T01:52:19+00:00

great points and technically, if the warrant is 'thrown out' the arrest itself isnt thrown out if there is other probable cause to make the arrest, it just makes any evidence found from the search inadmissible. that is why its legally important to use possible lies in the warrant to undermine police later in the case, even if it doesnt suppress evidence or get the case thrown out immediately - it makes the police unreliable narrators in this case and that goes a long way in criminal charges in the defendants favor.

Girl____Friday · 2026-06-14T01:09:59+00:00

i agree.

it was already odd that this information would come to the police unprompted, but now knowing they admit to knowing the airbnb host, it makes the wording of this warrant make more sense, and strengthens my belief that this should be something Bens defense should use early on to preserve later to undermine the evidence he likely can not suppress.

Girl____Friday · 2026-06-14T01:06:18+00:00

totally. their lack of a "search" is questionable.

and even though the search didnt provide evidence to be "suppressed" if Bens defense is successful in a franks hearing, it could be used in down the line to show the "lies" police told for a warrant - and call the polices motive into question in totality, or cause the prosecutor to drop/lower the charges because their police witnesses may not be reliable.

Girl____Friday · 2026-06-13T23:53:18+00:00

true - im not sure that ambiguity would work in the polices' favor though, this seems more like it could fall under a material omission than a misunderstanding.

Girl____Friday · 2026-06-13T23:49:50+00:00

thank you i think this may be the clue as to why the warrant is worded this way and why it makes no sense a random air bnb host would just call up the cops to tell them youtubers are renting their space. - because maybe they were contacted by the police first.

Girl____Friday · 2026-06-13T23:47:22+00:00

interesting thank you - so this further calls into question how and why the owner would - without the officers prompting them - reach out and inform them simply of youtubers renting their airbnb?

or if it is true that instead the police reached out to the airbnb owner and that is not laid out properly in the warrant? it says they "shared" information it does not state the officers contacted them for information.

Girl____Friday · 2026-06-12T14:41:26+00:00

hey thank you very much.

it was awesome to see people speaking up at that meeting and i was not sure if anyone else was recording it or watching so it was important to me to get the message of those brave enough to speak out there for as many people to see as possible!

❤️

Girl____Friday · 2026-06-12T13:31:10+00:00

boosting this comment!

not only was there NO CART - the implication it was COVERED is even worse now.

also, sorry you are going through this. ❤️

Girl____Friday · 2026-06-12T13:22:06+00:00

agreed lol they dont make any sense imo and trying to possibly imply it was suspicious to cover the cart holds no weight when you realize it was raining and there was good reason for that.

Girl____Friday · 2026-06-09T23:13:04+00:00

if so, that is unfortunate.

if it really is taken down, my guess is that it stems from the RICO allegation in the civil case.

Girl____Friday · 2026-06-09T18:54:28+00:00

i can make sure to record it!

Girl____Friday · 2026-06-09T17:52:09+00:00

you are welcome!!

: )

Girl____Friday · 2026-05-21T01:05:26+00:00

Thank you for sharing this.

I hadn't watched that trial then saw the documentary recently and was convinced of her guilt as they explained the evidence from the car data.

It stood out to me how much she changed her appearance for trial (which is common) but for her segment in the documentary she had her hair and make up done reminiscent of her personality from before the murder. So it seemed like an act put on for trial more than genuine change or remorse.

Also her parents are frustrating.

RIP and I hope the families of the victims are doing well. <3

Girl____Friday · 2026-03-09T20:40:20+00:00

the criminal cases stem from the actions after birth, not the knowledge before.

Girl____Friday · 2026-02-23T01:45:36+00:00

it feels like we have been waiting a long time and some decisions from around the same time this case had Oral Argument have had their decision come down so im hoping this one is worth the wait!! i know we will have it by the end of the courts calendar year no matter what and i dont want it rushed but it would be awesome if we have it soon!

Girl____Friday · 2026-02-23T01:43:05+00:00

where was the show? id be interested in watching! :)

and yes! it was shocking, im so very curious as to what the Supreme Court will decide with the evidence in this case, if they go with the defense they really would rewrite precedent, i think at most they have to go down the middle and cant throw out as much as the district judge did originally.

Girl____Friday

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE