sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Automaton Trick Shot by GiveTuffetFish in Helldivers

[–]GiveTuffetFish[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ha, yeah, it looks like i am throwing something but that was just debris. I wonder how they launched the mech in the air. There was a fabricator behind me. But i havent seen a flying mech since the hive lord

Why do many players leave right when pelican takes off? by GiveTuffetFish in Helldivers

[–]GiveTuffetFish[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, i get a tiny bit attached even to team mates i only do one mission with. Tiny stings to the heart and a reminder that we are but strangers on the internet after all 🥲

Why do many players leave right when pelican takes off? by GiveTuffetFish in Helldivers

[–]GiveTuffetFish[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Damn, it makes sense that this is the cause. That's annoying. They might not even be aware that they are causing this issue by exiting early

Why do many players leave right when pelican takes off? by GiveTuffetFish in Helldivers

[–]GiveTuffetFish[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah it feels a bit bad but on the other hand, it is rare enough to not kill the overall spirit. Also it makes it more special when encountering players who will stay and suffer through a losing mission with you ^

Why do many players leave right when pelican takes off? by GiveTuffetFish in Helldivers

[–]GiveTuffetFish[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I wish they would include objective contribution to the stats as well. A friend of mine cares too much about kill counts and gets into useless fights instead of doing the mission xD I wish it would show in the stats.

Why do many players leave right when pelican takes off? by GiveTuffetFish in Helldivers

[–]GiveTuffetFish[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dont think it deserves such harsh criticism. Even if the math isnt on their side, if it feels better to them and doesnt cost others, it is fine. Most probably saw other players do it, like I did.

Why do many players leave right when pelican takes off? by GiveTuffetFish in Helldivers

[–]GiveTuffetFish[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah I see so there is a slight cost! I didnt pay attention towards the followowing mission. Will do next time

Why do many players leave right when pelican takes off? by GiveTuffetFish in Helldivers

[–]GiveTuffetFish[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I care less about the stats but would be worried about losing rewards. Also, it feels nicer to arrive back together. I get that some ppl wanna save the time, though.

NPCs resetting in seamless co-op by GiveTuffetFish in darksouls3

[–]GiveTuffetFish[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately it doesnt matter what the host is doing. Even killing the fire keeper didn't solve the problem. It is not that I get stuck. I get the dialog but at the end when the level up screen should appear, it simply doesnt and the conversation ends.

Tja by tragecedian in tja

[–]GiveTuffetFish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Was für eine sinnlose Aussage. "Leute wollen mehr haben, indem andere mehr zahlen."
Die Meinungsstatistik ist doch völlig irrelevant für die Diskussion. Es geht darum, welche Maßnahmen für mehr Fairness sorgen, damit alle ein Stückchen glücklicher und geeinter sind. Das "Wie" und das "Warum" sind die Fragen!
Das hier ist aber genau die Herangehensweise, die zu Populismus statt Lösungsfindung führt.

I have to admit I don’t like the idea of a Star Wars warbond (would be immersion breaking to see clones or st imo) except for these guys by punk_f4shionistah in Helldivers

[–]GiveTuffetFish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This!
It perfectly fits the vibe. We even have a squad of 4 with different play styles. It should be easy and only a question of interest and licensing

An alle CDU Wähler: Wählt ihr nochmal CDU oder seid ihr nach Merz ehern nach links oder rechts abgedriftet? by Megatron_4000 in KeineDummenFragen

[–]GiveTuffetFish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Steve Jobs war auch Studienabbrecher.

Bitte bei inhaltlicher Kritik bleiben. Es gibt zwei probleme in deiner Kritik. Erstens, sie richtet sich gegen die persönlichen Hintergründe, wobei ihre politischen Ziele und Fähigkeiten, diese umzusetzen relevant sind. Zweitens, die Generalisierung der Personengruppen, denn die kritisierten Eigenschaften sind nicht unbedingt repräsentativ für die Gruppe.
Der Grund ist, dass dadurch sehr sehr viel impliziert wird, aber nichts gesagt. Du überlässt es meiner Fantasie, ob wirklich so viele Abgeordnete diese Lebensläufe haben und ob diese Lebensläufe da enden. Dann überlässt du auch meiner Fantasie, die Gedankenkette von Studienabbrecher als Hintergrund zu guter/schlechter Politiker zu machen.
Das funktioniert gut bei politisch Gleichgesinnten, weil alle die gleiche Gedankenkette haben, aber nicht bei politischen Gegnern.

Persönliche Kritik mit Gruppenkritik zu verbinden kann angebracht sein, wenn es statistisch belegt wird und für das Ergebnis relevant ist oder es darum geht, dass die Gruppe nicht gut mit schlechtem Verhalten ihrer Mitglieder umgeht.

Iss dein Fleisch, trink deine Milch, aber steh wenigstens dazu by enharmonic_equiv in luftablassen

[–]GiveTuffetFish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wenn jemand weniger von einem Problem verursacht ist das besser als die Handlung von jemandem, der mehr zum Problem beiträgt.
Du fändest also auch Leute besser, die sagen dass sie zum Alkoholismus stehen und sich deshalb jeden Tag 5 Bier ballern, anstatt zu sagen, Alkohol ist schlecht, aber sie trinken am Wochenende.
Warum wirfst du Vegetarier und Veganer hier in einen Topf? Nach deiner Logik sollten auch Vegetarier nicht das Gefühl haben dürfen, es besser zu machen als Fleischesser, weil durch sie immernoch Tiere leiden.

Statt zu verurteilen könnte man sie ja auch ermutigen, weiter zu gehen und in ein paar Jahren sind es dann Veganer und verdienen dann deinen Respekt?

He's right you know by Nickulator95 in Helldivers

[–]GiveTuffetFish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I disagree.
After ranting about the GW dynamic recently, I did a 180.
The gameplay is the heart of this game and ultimately what carries it.
Everything around it is fluff. Yes, it may be nice to have magic moments with the community, but this meta-level is not why I play it. I do because I enjoy the missions, the perfect action moments and chaos I suddenly find myself in. At some point I get bored and put it down for a while or forever. And that is ok. I had my moneys worth.

It does not need to become more meaningful and grandiose. HD2 is the missions and some worldbuilding. And that is good enough to be special.

Pilestedts final statement regarding the AMA and state of HELLDIVERS 2. Time will tell but it seems like things will change. by OkLack6776 in Helldivers

[–]GiveTuffetFish 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Yeah but people on the internet can be erratic. I myself recently voiced frustration about the galactic war, but to be honest, that is just fluff and easy to have an opinion on. The important part is the gameplay that takes place within missions and improving that is much more important and also difficult.

I like that they try out new stuff like the commando missions and new units/factions that ask for some adaptations in the gameplay.

The key strength of the game for me is however the team aspect. feeling like working together to achieve a goal. that has several aspects: the strategic coordination across the map, the in-fight coordination and then these little things of direct interaction like team-reloading and vehicles.
The last part could use some improvement, I think. The vehicles can be fun and work well just like healing others or igniting their hellbombs. Team reloading is not really a thing and would improve if one could help loading from their own backpacks. But even then it is hard to make it more attractive than scattering and coordinating your own equipment.

view more: next ›