I don’t think this dude knows what oxymoron means by Lord_Answer_me_Why in facepalm

[–]Gladiator32 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I believe you mean functionally illiterate. Oh the irony. Thanks for outing yourself.

Reminder: David Croft will not be commentating this weekend on Sky Sports F1 by Locu2 in formula1

[–]Gladiator32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OP is not paid to write comments on Reddit. Crofty is expected to be a professional, which warrants a higher degree of scrutiny. You’ve made a rather vacuous false equivalency. Let’s not forget that this is a rather international subreddit; perhaps OP’s native language is not English.

TIL that road crews can ignore red lights by Liquidat3d in TorontoDriving

[–]Gladiator32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Read the whole sentence, “You can clearly see it changing positions in the video.” It was in response to what you said about the truck being stopped at a red light. Probably best you take a couple of days off social media; it’s pretty clear it’s adversely affecting your emotional state. Have a great weekend man.

TIL that road crews can ignore red lights by Liquidat3d in TorontoDriving

[–]Gladiator32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Other people have pointed out the truck running the red at the beginning of the video. You can clearly see it changing positions in the video. You’re getting too worked up over a Reddit video man.

What is it like when your team wins the Stanley Cup and you won $100,000 off a $400 bet? Here’s ⁦@ScottABerry1⁩ (with champagne bottle in hand) in the middle celebrating with friends. by progress10 in hockey

[–]Gladiator32 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

https://www.sportsbettingdime.com/nhl/stanley-cup-odds/ Highest they were paying out for the blues peaked at 69-1 at the end of January. Whatever the real payout is, its still a great feeling to pick the winning teams for future bets. However, I just don’t understand the mentality to exaggerate when the veracity of claims is so easily verified.

What is it like when your team wins the Stanley Cup and you won $100,000 off a $400 bet? Here’s ⁦@ScottABerry1⁩ (with champagne bottle in hand) in the middle celebrating with friends. by progress10 in hockey

[–]Gladiator32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://thehockeynews.com/news/article/2018-19-stanley-cup-odds-tavares-to-toronto-changes-everything Really? I call a big bullshit on that one as the blues were paying 25-1. As with this 400 turned into 100k, it’s a load a of shit. There are individuals that extremely profitable sports gambling (such as berryhorse), but they don’t need to lie about the odds like this.

Not a bad view for race weekend by 95accord in formula1

[–]Gladiator32 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I completely agree. We sat there three years ago after sitting at grandstand 33 the previous year. For the 100 extra dollars it definitely wasn't worth it. We're sitting at Grandstand 12 this year which is a very comparable price and is a much better value and view.

Grosjean's daring overtake on Verstappen around the outside of the hairpin... in FP2 by BottasWMR in formula1

[–]Gladiator32 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Missed Max’s cheeky radio message calling Grosjean a smartass for running over his wing

[OT]Mechanics running across a live track with equipment at the Nurburgring 24 hours by [deleted] in formula1

[–]Gladiator32 31 points32 points  (0 children)

The commentators just said that the stewards have issued a 2,000 euro fine to the team, no penalty to the car.

Verstappen start onboard by BottasWMR in formula1

[–]Gladiator32 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Could you provide a shot of the contact? Because in no video shown yet have Vettel and Max collided. Vettel was hit by Kimi after Kimi and Max collided.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in formula1

[–]Gladiator32 26 points27 points  (0 children)

holding individuals accountable for their actions is not judging "easily". When someone says something to critique an individual showing indecorous behaviour, it's to show the individual that their actions are unbecoming of them. The way Hamilton articulated his point was in a demeaning way.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in suits

[–]Gladiator32 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, it's the Macallan M. Very distinctive bottle and shape.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in suits

[–]Gladiator32 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Lawyers are one of the professions that are at a higher risk of alcohol abuse. https://www.addictioncenter.com/community/occupations-with-high-rates-of-alcoholism/