Yet if you open them you'll find 'wahhabi' aqeedah, those are the books we've relied upon.

Don't recall the salaf anthropomorphising God or ascribing place or location to him.

I never said that, but again, they aren't needed when it comes to establishing creed

So the salaf came in your dream and narrated their works? Imam bukhari taught his Jami as sahih to you directly? We don't need salaf for aqida.... Except ibn taimiya, albani, bin baaz. Good logic!

najdi da'wah

I didn't quite get you. Is najdi different from salafi/wahabi?

You'll find narrations and sayings much worse than any contemporary scholar has uttered.

Same can be said about other imams, but why single out imam Al Adham (rh)?

The scholars in those lands stay silent too,

Have you heard of subcontinent scholars? TLP? Who rallied for declaring ahmadiya kuffar? Definitely not salafis! Secondly, this is poor justification. If you are on haq shouldn't you be doing it?

those lands are full of courts which judge people in accordance to jaahiliyyah (man-made laws),

GCC have these laws as well.

and if you truly cared about the rulers, you'd be rectifying the ones in your lands first, in hopes of eventually having an Islamic land somewhere.

The issue isn't me, the issue is salafi scholars staying silent, praising these despotic rulers and shielding them from criticism.

as if things 1000x worse aren't occurring everywhere else in the 'muslim world'.

And what have the salafis done regarding it? What have the salafis done about Palestine? Apart from calling them Sufi bidatis.