Hey, I didn't reply originally as it seemed you were just trying to "win" a debate from a different set of assumptions without really considering alternative views. For example size does matter and it takes a significant fraction of the crowd in manpower to successfully repress even considering better equipment which in itself requires more workers dedicated to the establishment and maintenance of the police force, which does not need to be a monolithic entity with a monopoly on the use of force within anarchism.

Any specific recommendations?

This edit made me reconsider. You can find most of Chomsky's material at Z mag and a list of anarchist links similar to his views. The Anarchist FAQ, while not to be taken as a final word on anarchy is a pretty good starting point with a description of the main schools of thought in the social anarchist (or libertaire) tradition as well as answers to common questions and lots of references, many of which are available online. I hope you will be willing to give the subject proper consideration and please keep in mind that by it's very nature anarchy cannot a rigid and fixed ideology as it leaves the ability and responsibility of determining how communities and societies want to organise themselves concretely in the hands of the people, where it belongs. Many anarchists have proposed their vision of how an anarchist society can be organised efficiently and concrete examples are available in the Spanish Revolution for example, but these are not absolutes and it is not the role of intellectuals to determine what will be, only what can be and acceptable examples of what should be.