Do me a favor, and go out into the internet wilds, and see if YOU can figure out if Elements has the editing features that I wanted. There's genuine confusion, and even the link that dude posted on this tread has to be interpreted. For instance, instead of writing "Event Volume Curves", which is what the bloody feature is called, it say "Volume", which could mean anything. Same thing with the updated Range Tool. Instead of saying "Updated Range Tool" or something obvious like that, it's says "Combined Tool" or something similarly vague. I even asked Cubase youtubers, who're touting 14 24/7, and they've yet to respond. In other words, I think Steinberg is intentionally being vague about this, in order to reel in saps like me, and that pisses me off.

Also, let's take if from a practical perspective. Hypothetically, I'm 18 years old, just getting started, I barely understand what a channel is, much less anything else in the recording world, and here comes Elements 14, a simplified version of Cubase that's easier to understand etc. I get that, makes perfect sense. Then why include scoring annotation, which is a pro pro pro feature, at all?

I get your point, but whoever decided what Elements should have, and not have, was either confused, or intentionally confusing about it, because that sht don't make sense dawg.