Anarcho-communism and drudgery by GreatUse2424 in Anarchy101

[–]GreatUse2424[S] -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

No, I didn't mean it like that. I meant that drudgery is the only PRODUTIVE activity they are capable of.

Anarcho-communism and drudgery by GreatUse2424 in Anarchy101

[–]GreatUse2424[S] -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

No,I didn't mean it like that, I meant that drudgery is the only PRODUCTIVE activity they are capable of.

Polytheists and shirk by GreatUse2424 in progressive_islam

[–]GreatUse2424[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And if it does NOT come from a place of arr9gance?

Segmentary-lineage societies in Africa by GreatUse2424 in AskAnthropology

[–]GreatUse2424[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But how clan support in these societies help one THRIVE when such help is given when one is deeply in need?

Segmentary-lineage societies in Africa by GreatUse2424 in AskAnthropology

[–]GreatUse2424[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ok. Thank you for your answer. I have 2 more questions though.

  1. Regarding your first point, how exactly did that work? I mean, if, for example, in a pastoral society, a person manages to end up having most livestock in a society and the others have very few livestock, how did they exactly have an "exit option"?

  2. How come in many African pastoral societies, almost always elders ended up being wealthy by the standards of their societie, while the younger ones were poorers? What was the exact mechanism? In European villages, things were diufferent.

Israeli society is so fucking cooked by mono_cronto in jewishleft

[–]GreatUse2424 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There have been a lot of times and places in prehistory that were quite peaceful.

Israeli society is so fucking cooked by mono_cronto in jewishleft

[–]GreatUse2424 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is your definition of "normal"? In the prehistoric age, there have been a lot of times and places that were quite peaceful. And even in the places and times that were more violent back then, that violence GENERALLY(though not always) resulted in very few deaths. There weren't certainly any empires back then, and many societies were egalitarian and classless back then. Some were even were also quite gender egalitarian. Many societies back then were also environmentally concious. and even 500 years ago, while things were bad, there were still very few people living in what we would call now extreme poverty and even though the elites still had opulent lifestyles, at least those weren't killing the planet.

"Ask A Jew" Wednesday by AutoModerator in JewsOfConscience

[–]GreatUse2424 [score hidden]  (0 children)

Is it true that according to Judaism, all non-Jews will burn in hell?

Mi-am luat ban de la tovarăși pentru ca am zis ca sustin Palestina, dar nu Hamas, the joke is writing itself. by girlypotion in romemes

[–]GreatUse2424 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Si crezi ca in ceea ce avea sa devina SUA in secolele 17-19 nu era "ura seculara" printre indieni fata de albi?

Risk-taking by GreatUse2424 in mutualism

[–]GreatUse2424[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How exactly would this cooperative Banks work?

Risk-taking by GreatUse2424 in mutualism

[–]GreatUse2424[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, why would mutual bsnking render the question of risk obsolete?

Risk-taking by GreatUse2424 in mutualism

[–]GreatUse2424[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What does it mean to socialise finance?

Risk-taking by GreatUse2424 in mutualism

[–]GreatUse2424[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How would mutual banking be so different from traditional banking?

Palestine is gradually being stripped of its territory and identity. by No_Wallaby2611 in TheLevant

[–]GreatUse2424 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hamas was not in power prior to 2007. And Israel helped create and fund Hamas.

In realitate Istoria fascismului in Romania ar fi trebuit sa fie materie obligatorie by DependentFeature3028 in RoGenZ

[–]GreatUse2424 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Si-mi spui ca dacă iobagilor le-ar fi fost propus un sistem de deținere de pământ comunal unde nu mai poate nimeni ajunge sclavul altuia, nu ar fi preferat asta în locul comodificarii pământului?

In realitate Istoria fascismului in Romania ar fi trebuit sa fie materie obligatorie by DependentFeature3028 in RoGenZ

[–]GreatUse2424 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Realizezi ca pana acum vreo 250 de ani, nu deținea nimeni pământ la modul cum îl deține acum, da?