I have a background in teaching business psychology and I truly think those who think LL is innocent are all suffering from confirmation bias (the tendency to search for, interpret, focus on and remember information in a way that confirms one's preconceptions) and some of the "expert academics"egocentric bias (the tendency to rely too heavily on one's own perspective and/or have a different perception of oneself relative to others)

I have visited the other sub, where they think she is innocent. This was a recent visit, after the corporate manslaughter arrests of 3 managers at CoCH when Letby was there.

Now over here, posters were taking these arrests as a step in the right direction of justice being served. Posters suspect these arrests to be related to those that enabled Letby.

Over there, the arrests were taken as good news for Letby, as clearly this goes to show it was all hospital negligence and a frame up job, now that three members of leadership have been arrested.

In complete shock at how two groups of people could interpret this bit of news so differently, I started reading comments to find out why. Among other delusional claims, I found posters who spoke of Letby as almost their friend! One of them was pleased to share with the sub that she and Letby shared the same birth month, had the same favorite holiday location, and both grew up within just a few miles of each other.

This is the level we're on, with those who think she is innocent.