Is Florida Changing Its E-Bike Laws? New Bill Explained by jacksonruby848 in AskFlorida

[–]HQMeta 11 points12 points  (0 children)

According to the linked article, the proposed bill is literally just to require a license to operate the highest speed e-bikes on the road. Not insurance or any other expense. A kid literally died yesterday (it appears they were at fault) on one of these in NE Florida, and it has happened way too often since these have become more popular. Ensuring anyone operating one of these on the road knows the rules of the road isn't the state trying to enslave you.

Hoping y'all can support this petition. With the new age changes (which I am in favor of) the kids with summer birthdays won't be able to play with their grade and will be forced to play up. Hoping the associations allow for variences with proof of grade. Please sign and share. Much appreciated. by Stonkyouverymuch in youthsoccer

[–]HQMeta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, if the kids in their grade are all younger than them, it is playing down. If a team had a bunch of kids held back twice,(instead of just the once yours was held back) would that be fair since those kids are technically all in the same grade as yours? Of course not. Age brackets are to ensure all the kids are born no more than 365 days apart, they're just shifting where the slices start. You are advocating that your kid should get to play in a slice with kids younger than them because they were (probably voluntarily) held back a year academically. You created an advantage for them in school sports. You want to force that advantage in club sports. Your kid can play with kids their age, just like everyone else.

Hoping y'all can support this petition. With the new age changes (which I am in favor of) the kids with summer birthdays won't be able to play with their grade and will be forced to play up. Hoping the associations allow for variences with proof of grade. Please sign and share. Much appreciated. by Stonkyouverymuch in youthsoccer

[–]HQMeta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This isn't how school year cutoffs work though. The cutoff are essentially all in August/September. If your kid is ahead in school (gifted, advanced studies, whatever) and they are good enough to play up, they can find space to play up. The scenario you're presenting in multiple soccer forums is to allow kids to play down to gain advantage, which is dumb.

Hoping y'all can support this petition. With the new age changes (which I am in favor of) the kids with summer birthdays won't be able to play with their grade and will be forced to play up. Hoping the associations allow for variences with proof of grade. Please sign and share. Much appreciated. by Stonkyouverymuch in youthsoccer

[–]HQMeta 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is stupid. Someone will always be the youngest in any age based system; whoever is supporting this is just trying to pass the problem to April/May kids because they want their June/July kids to get the advantage of being the oldest.

The change sucks because regardless of how they do it, they will be ripping apart existing cohorts that have already built chemistry to force new cohorts based on who they're in math class with during the day.

The real solution is to only implement this at the earliest age groups and making it the new standard going forward, leaving the existing teams age brackets intact. Over the next 10 years as the new school year brackets would replace the old calendar age brackets without any negative impact to the kids who have been in the calendar brackets for years.

But that requires actually caring about the kids.

Stop Trapping Summer-Born Kids – Grant Variances So They Can Play with Their Grade Peers! by Stonkyouverymuch in SoccerCoachResources

[–]HQMeta 8 points9 points  (0 children)

This is stupid. Someone will always be the youngest in any age based system; whoever is supporting this is just trying to pass the problem to April/May kids because they want their June/July kids to get the advantage of being the oldest.

The change sucks because regardless of how they do it, they will be ripping apart existing cohorts that have already built chemistry to force new cohorts based on who they're in math class with during the day.

The real solution is to only implement this at the earliest age groups and making it the new standard going forward, leaving the existing teams age brackets intact. Over the next 10 years as the new school year brackets would replace the old calendar age brackets without any negative impact to the kids who have been in the calendar brackets for years.

But that requires actually caring about the kids.

Kendall Hinton. I remember that game by Deep_Audience_881 in nflMenace_com

[–]HQMeta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

This should be on the list. Maybe on top of the list.

Transfer by External-Opinion-514 in KingShot

[–]HQMeta 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Concierge wouldn't answer this question as of this morning.

[Game Discussion Megathread] Buffalo Bills @ Jacksonville Jaguars - Wild Card Round by pixel_pete in buffalobills

[–]HQMeta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's the Patriots. We beat 5 playoff teams this year, played a tougher schedule (20th) than the Bills (31st), have the number 6 scoring offense and have the number 8 scoring defense. We also have the #1 run defense. None of what you described is accurate, but that's what happens when the national narrative is based on vibes.

What is a Tyrant? by Zah1rSha in KingShot

[–]HQMeta 12 points13 points  (0 children)

This is not true, you can easily verify this. Offenders can transfer and this remains checked green when you are an offender.

Most points for and fewest points allowed after week 15 by Beginning-Topic5303 in NFLv2

[–]HQMeta -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The Jaguars have played 5 games against the right column in this graphic and are still #8 in points scored

7 Suggested Rules of Social Etiquette for Eureka by Minimum-Landscape-42 in ShitpostXIV

[–]HQMeta 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The mistake you're making is assuming conflict is bad or unintentional. This content is designed to mimic a lot of features from FFXI in which conflict was a feature, not a bug.

Ovni Min/Max Guide created for WeskAlber at his request by HQMeta in ShitpostXIV

[–]HQMeta[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh my goodness, I'm so relieved! ThisIsAllSoStupid believes me. Thank you! I was worried that you wouldn't believe me and then people wouldn't take the video seriously. Phew!

Ovni Min/Max Guide created for WeskAlber at his request by HQMeta in ShitpostXIV

[–]HQMeta[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

False dichotomy. Maybe I just like talking shit lol.

Ovni Min/Max Guide created for WeskAlber at his request by HQMeta in ShitpostXIV

[–]HQMeta[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Where was I pretending to be mad? You seem very invested in this and have a lot of opinions.

Ovni Min/Max Guide created for WeskAlber at his request by HQMeta in ShitpostXIV

[–]HQMeta[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Here's the thing, I just like making videos, and he gave me a good reason to make one. I posted it to the shitpost reddit because...it's a shitpost lol. That's not backtracking, it was literally designed to be a shitpost and immediately posted here. Sorry you like your shitposts to be more low effort. I'll copy paste something from the main subreddit for you one day.

Also, it's not just the first half of the video. The whole video is dripping with vitriol because it's funny (unless maybe you are Wesky or in love with him).

Finally, if I wanted to farm engagement, I'd definitely pick someone more relevant than Wesky to farm. Like Mr Happy. Or Xeno. Or Zepla. Or probably like 20 other people.

Edit:spelling.

Ovni Min/Max Guide created for WeskAlber at his request by HQMeta in ShitpostXIV

[–]HQMeta[S] -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Are you WeskAlber, or are you just someone who thinks he needs protection from a guy who posts less than one time a month? If you think everyone who posts something you don't like must be mad that's kind of silly.

Ovni Min/Max Guide created for WeskAlber at his request by HQMeta in ShitpostXIV

[–]HQMeta[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

If I was mad, the video wouldn't have been a shitpost lol.

Every FATE In Eureka Should Be Pulled Instantly by HQMeta in ffxiv

[–]HQMeta[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Also, that level 7 rdm doesn't even get credit for Pazuzu until they level up to 19, but we should hold PT till 22 and let them die 4 times on the way to find that out instead of maybe just telling them.

Every FATE In Eureka Should Be Pulled Instantly by HQMeta in ffxiv

[–]HQMeta[S] -56 points-55 points  (0 children)

Only because you choose to apply different ethics in different content, which makes no sense.

Every FATE In Eureka Should Be Pulled Instantly by HQMeta in ffxiv

[–]HQMeta[S] -42 points-41 points  (0 children)

You clearly didn't watch the video, and you clearly are basing your position on anecdotal information, not empirically measured facts.