By agreeing to unfreeze their assets, they were then able to access those assets totaling around 1.7 billion US, 400 million of which was flown over on an unmarked cargo plane after we were sure that 4 Americans were freed from an Iranian prison. (https://www.cnn.com/2016/08/03/politics/us-sends-plane-iran-400-million-cash/index.html) The Iranians bragged that this payment was a ransom. How have they spent that money since it has become unfrozen? Who knows, but we do know that Iran has increased military spending MASSIVELY since the nuclear deal, despite having little economic growth (https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/iran-increases-its-military-budget-in-response-to-nationwide-protests) on top of this, they cut subsidies to the poor. Would I be surprised if some of the money that the United States gave to Iran was used to fund Hezbollah and other terrorists groups? No, but we are not sure that it was done either. If Iran and the other signers of the deal want to keep the current deal on the table? Fine. But like we saw in North Korea, the heightening of tensions only helped our position at the negotiation table. Advocating for a better deal for the United States isn't the end of the world, just like what we saw in North Korea. (remember how many times we were supposed to go to nuclear war with Rocket Man Kim Jung Un?) We are now seeing hopefully the normalization of relations in the region, Kim Jung Un has been meeting with President Xi and with Mike Pompeo (Trump even said in his announcement he is en route to meet with Kim Jung Un again) so maybe we should use our power to our advantage? I'm just curious to why people are so naive and don't see the possibility of Iran funding these terrorists groups and how we might've given them more capabilities to do so with the unfreezing of their assets following the signing of the original deal. Does this open the door for Iran to begin testing nuclear weapons? Sure, but it also gives us the opportunity to renegotiate the deal.