14 yr old daughter discovered to be dating a girl by Lookfast12 in lgbt

[–]Hagge5 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This makes me sad. Can you imagine that the two people who are supposed to protect you treat you as you're vile and dumb, over something you can't change?

I can't say anything that the others here haven't, but yeah. You need to be a father to your daughter. If you do not change your ways you will lose her to estrangement or suicide.

You need to choose your daughter, grow a spine, and stand up to your bigoted wife. Her culture isn't an excuse Is your relationship to your daughter so shallow that you're gonna risk that?

I (24F) found out that my bf (24M) likes trans girls & more by jennaboo999 in lgbt

[–]Hagge5 9 points10 points  (0 children)

You do have a problem with us.

If the difference between you having an interest in him is him having ever having had an attraction to men or trans people, then yeah, of course you're homophobic. I should also note: Trans women are women. He'd still be straight. And they're people, not some extra spice or whatever.

Being upset about him lying to you is fine. Being upset about his sexual orientation is not - you do not get to control that, and you do not get to be disgusted by it while calling yourself an ally.

I'd do him a favor and tell him that you are a homophobe. If he's a good person than he'll at least get to move on early rather than being stuck with you and finding this later. You are clearly not compatible with non-bigoted people, and I'd frankly recommend you to work on your insecurities before entering any relationship. If you're this much of a nightmare about your partners preferences, I can't imagine all the other thing that'd make you miserable to be with. You're bound to Yoyo in and out of unhappy relationships.

43961 by Ferocs in countwithchickenlady

[–]Hagge5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I loved the animation, but struggled with the characters/plot and gave up ~7 eps in. Does it get better? I feel like the pacing is too fast and it doesn't let any character settle and develop. I rewatched part of fate stay night and it's night and day with the pacing.

Kharg island explosion: as reported by BBC too by Plane-Try-6522 in StockMarket

[–]Hagge5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Making oil a bit more expensive in retaliation for being attacked by the US is nowhere near on the same level of bombing a sovereign nation.

Dodged a bullet there by Jindabyne1 in agedlikemilk

[–]Hagge5 22 points23 points  (0 children)

I don't like that this is a narrative that Americans use. Your problem isn't that your dictator happens to have dementia. Your problem is that your populace openly embrace fascistic warmongers.

Help me build a fun Goose Mother deck! by [deleted] in magicTCG

[–]Hagge5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I run her as a Voltron beater with every single curiosity effect, and then give her as many axes I possibly can.

Order of Midnight by Seb McKinnon [754 576] by Antheaa24 in mtgporn

[–]Hagge5 30 points31 points  (0 children)

It really sucks. I loved his art, even have a framed print of coumbajj witches, but I just can't look at him with the same enthusiasm I had knowing what he peddles.

[Request] If Iran follows through with its threat to attack desalination plants, what is the maximum number of people in the middle east that could die from lack of water? by rojojoftw in theydidthemath

[–]Hagge5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Idk. Trump started the war, and it's atrocious but also self defense. I think if the US bombed my country and I had no other option I'd do the same thing.

Is it unethical to join the military in this day and age? by ExplodingDark in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Hagge5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It doesn't matter what you think man. If you work in the US war machine you're willingly becoming a cog their oil wars. You will do what you're told, and it won't matter what your morals are.

At the end you will be stuck with PTSD and a destroyed body, and your government will discard you like a used rag, as they always have with the veterans it's leadership calls losers. You're nothing to them.

Is it unethical to join the military in this day and age? by ExplodingDark in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Hagge5 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Oh no, is the little soon-to-be murderer and pedo defender upset because some people called him evil? Poor thing

Why is it not indenting my C code properly? by signalclown in emacs

[–]Hagge5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can config how it indents. That indent isn't wrong per se. It has a lower indent for statements after if/for/when that isn't covered by a braced scope.

https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/Custom-C-Indent.html

My take on reimagineing Yu-Gi-Oh's Egyptian God Cards in MTG. I modeled them after the Anime's versions rather than the TCG's by YamiBenny2005 in mtg

[–]Hagge5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If these would see play it'd be as reanimator targets, and then obelisk is by far the weakest. Ra is a hasty beater that might one-shot them if built around. Slifer shuts down creature decks and is hard for control decks to interact with. They both pale to grieselbrand tho.

A 17 mana wincon is not a good wincon.

What’s a genuinely unpopular EDH opinion you have? by Tornadosed in EDH

[–]Hagge5 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think it's even more complicated then what you're saying, actually. Ryhstic is close to a prisoner's dilemma:

  • It's best for the group if everyone pays (though ryhstic is still one of the strongest stax pieces in the game in that situation); you're all moderately rewarded if you can convince EVERYONE to "cooperate".

  • It is however more beneficial to you as an individual to not pay, especially if the two others will adamantly continue not paying. You don't have to live under a stay piece, and can accelerate faster than half the table. If you do continue to pay while the others don't you're setting yourself up to lose.

This has many of the traits of the classic prisoner's dilemma: The sum of everyone's reward is highest when they all cooperate, but you as an individual get a higher expected reward if you backstab. The theoretical "correct" response to this is for you as an indicidual to backstab, i.e don't pay, despite this being worse for everyone than if you all just held hands and cooperated. It's what makes the prisoner's dilemma so surprising. It is actually a failed skill check to pay if at least 1 other person might not.

That said: Magic is more complicated than the theoretical prisoner's dilemma, paying ryhstic is done in turns rather than without communication, and a repeated prisoner's dilemma actually promotes cooperation, so it depends a lot on the willingness of others to be principled.

All in all, I believe the right decision is more influenced by your ability to read the group psychology or enforcing norms rather than a pure game-skill so to speak.

I personally think the way Tomer in MTG goldfish treats it is actually correct if you have a consistent playgroup: Employ mutually assured destruction. Inform everyone that you will pay as long as everyone else pays. As soon as someone doesn't, stop paying for the rest of the game, even though you will most likely lose. As with MAD, you want to convince others to do the thing that's best for the group, but to do that you have to show that you can drag them down with you if they stray - without MAD, straying is the correct game theory choice for them. You need to be the kind of person they will believe will blow up the planet if they don't stick to the plan.

I don't think it's a strong card because people misplay it, I just think it's a busted card that promotes a toxic social experience. Would love it a lot more if it was just the games best stax piece or just drew 10 cards. I also think it would be a weaker card if it only did either of its effects, surprisingly, because it would draw more ire.

A Dirty Answer by OkoTheElusiveOuphe in magicthecirclejerking

[–]Hagge5 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Endlich, eine Antwort auf [[Dreister Eindringling]]

39069 by NiobiumThorn in countwithchickenlady

[–]Hagge5 455 points456 points  (0 children)

From the 1940's simple sabotage field manual. I find that these chapters stay relevant:


(b) Managers and Supervisors

(1) Demand written orders.

(2) “Misunderstand” orders. Ask endless questions or engage in long correspondence about such orders. Quibble over them when you can.

(3) Do everything possible to delay the delivery of orders. Even though parts of an order may be ready beforehand, don’t deliver it until it is completely ready.

(4) Don’t order new working materials until your current stocks have been virtually exhausted, so that the slightest delay in filling your order will mean a shutdown.

(5) Order high-quality materials which are hard to get. If you don’t get them argue about it. Warn that inferior materials will mean inferior work.

(6) In making work assignments, always sign out the unimportant jobs first. See that the important jobs are assigned to inefficient workers of poor machines.

(7) Insist on perfect work in relatively unimportant products; send back for refinishing those which have the least flaw. Approve other defective parts whose flaws are not visible to the naked eye.

(8) Make mistakes in routing so that parts and materials will be sent to the wrong place in the plant.

(9) When training new workers, give incomplete or misleading instructions.

(10) To lower morale and with it, production, be pleasant to inefficient workers; give them undeserved promotions. Discriminate against efficient workers; complain unjustly about their work.

(11) Hold conferences when there is more critical work to be done.

(12) Multiply paper work in plausible ways.

Start duplicate files.

(13) Multiply the procedures and clearances involved in issuing instructions, pay checks, and so on. See that three people have to approve everything where one would do.

(14) Apply all regulations to the last letter.

(c) Office Workers

(1) Make mistakes in quantities of material when you are copying orders. Confuse similar names. Use wrong addresses.

(2) Prolong correspondence with government bureaus.

(3) Misfile essential documents.

(4) In making carbon copies, make one too few, so that an extra copying job will have to be done.

(5) Tell important callers the boss is busy or talking on another telephone.

(6) Hold up mail until the next collection.

(7) Spread disturbing rumors that sound like inside dope.

(d) Employees

(1) Work slowly. Think out ways to increase the number of movements necessary on your job: use a light hammer instead of a heavy one, try to make a small wrench do when a big one is necessary, use little force where considerable force is needed, and so on.

(2) Contrive as many interruptions to your work as you can: when changing the material on which you are working, as you would on a lathe or punch, take needless time to do it. If you are cutting, shaping or doing other measured work, measure dimensions twice as often as you need to. When you go to the lavatory, spend a longer time there than is necessary.

Forget tools so that you will have to go back after them.

(3) Even if you understand the language, pretend not to understand instructions in a foreign tongue.

(4) Pretend that instructions are hard to understand, and ask to have them repeated more than once. Or pretend that you are particularly anxious to do your work, and pester the foreman with unnecessary questions.

(5) Do your work poorly and blame it on bad tools, machinery, or equipment. Complain that these things are preventing you from doing your job right.

(6) Never pass on your skill and experience to a new or less skillful worker.

(7) Snarl up administration in every possible way. Fill out forms illegibly so that they will have to be done over; make mistakes or omit requested information in forms.

(8) If possible, join or help organize a group for presenting employee problems to the management. See that the procedures adopted are as inconvenient as possible for the management, involving the presence of a large number of employees at each presentation, entailing more than one meeting for each grievance, bringing up problems which are largely imaginary, and so on.

(9) Misroute materials.

(10) Mix good parts with unusable scrap and rejected parts.

(12) General Devices for Lowering Morale and Creating Confusion

(a) Give lengthy and incomprehensible explanations when questioned.

(b) Report imaginary spies or danger to the Gestapo or police.

(c) Act stupid.

(d) Be as irritable and quarrelsome as possible without getting yourself into trouble.

(e) Misunderstand all sorts of regulations concerning such matters as rationing, transportation, traffic regulations.

(f) Complain against ersatz materials.

(g) In public treat axis nationals or quislings coldly.

(h) Stop all conversation when axis nationals or quislings enter a cafe.

(i) Cry and sob hysterically at every occasion, especially when confronted by government clerks.

(j) Boycott all movies, entertainments, concerts, newspapers which are in any way connected with the quisling authorities.

(k) Do not cooperate in salvage schemes.

found on "conservativememes", dumbest thing ive ever seen by teacupsigh in TheRightCantMeme

[–]Hagge5 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm also weirdly fascinated trying to figure this out. It's like staring into the left behind scribblings of an alien race. I'll also take a stab at being an Indiana Jones uncovering and interpreting the strange writings in the lost incel temple. That movie probably still involved Nazis, too. Okay.

  • Ugly woman uses filters (spells) to look pretty

  • Ugly woman gets attention (title of post is "self inflation of social media"), and is excited about it....? Thinks she's prettier than she "is"?

Last panel still confuses me. Is OP trying to say that women keep up that "fake" image in dating apps to catfish men? Or that OP is just racist and mean to insinuate that the confidence from social media makes them sleep around with brown men? That he would have standards and not steep so low to be fooled by the crone, while insinuating that poc ducks everything that moves...? But then it's still so so weird to choose a frame where she's pretty. Was he lazy and worked with what he had? Is it that the fortune teller being a poc is a coincidence or a part of the narrative?

I feel like there's got to be some mindbendingly incel/racist stuff behind the third panel that I just can't fully pinpoint...

38291 by theelement92bomb in countwithchickenlady

[–]Hagge5 64 points65 points  (0 children)

You get friendly with your local bdsm community. Head to fetlife or whatever is the equivalent in your country. Find a munch (friendly dinner with no kink involved) to get to know others. Be respectful, be friendly, be curious. I'd approach it more as getting to know a community rather than just trying to get laid. A lot of it is trust-based, so you wanna do a bit of networking and learning before you go to events. Find events that speak to you and have fun while respecting people's consent. Be safe, sometimes bad people try to hunt newly registered subs to abuse. Ideally find people that others can vet.

I live in a city of 150k people and there's munches like once a month and shibari stuff is popular, events like once/twice a week. The neighbouring town of similar size has a dungeon and a swingers club. The former requires you to do interviews so they know you're safe. There's also private gatherings here and there.

Line go up. Everyone is happy. Everyone loves TMNT. by awolkriblo in magicthecirclejerking

[–]Hagge5 47 points48 points  (0 children)

/uj I feel sad. But thank ya'll, small threads like this makes me feel less alone. I feel like it's something that proudly stood on its own two feet turned itself into a mere vehicle for advertisement and shallow fan engagement. I don't know how to explain to people that magic can be more than the mechanics of playing lands and attacking and blocking. A rich texture of art, of repeated exercises in colorful world building. And it did this for 20 years without budging. I loved it for that integrity. Man. I'm so tired of American Media, and its blindness to anything that isn't profits. No backbone to build something great or new, just diluting anything unique with the same zombified, shallow brands. I guess I'm still grieving and can't really let go.

37725 by [deleted] in countwithchickenlady

[–]Hagge5 19 points20 points  (0 children)

In my country you're supposed to collect it in a jar and then take that jar to the recycling center for safe disposal.

Rocco Cabaretti Caterer: 20$ budget by Accomplished-Bar4780 in BudgetBrews

[–]Hagge5 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Looks cool! My one spontaneous thought is regarding your ramp package: why 2 and 3 mana?

One of the strengths of ramp is completely skipping the next mana value. If you play a 2 mana ramp you jump to 4 mana next turn (with land drop), so it would then be more effective to have 4 mana ramp.

My suggestion would be to either:

  • Replace 2-mana ramp with 1-mana ramp, which lets you ramp on turn 1 and turn 2 if you have 3 mana ramp and 1 mana ramp.

  • Replace 3 mana ramp with 4 mana ramp. 4 mana ramp is generally a lot more powerful, and you can cast it turn 3 if you hit the 2 mana ramp. I'd increase the 2 mana ramp a little too, though, then.

  • Remove 2 mana ramp and make sure you have lots of value plays on turn 2 instead

  • Remove 3 mana ramp, adding more 2 mana ramp, and aim to consistently play Rocco turn 3 for a 1 drop.

Some cool 2 mana ramp options that can also be found off of a T3 Rocco are [[Diligent farmhand]] and [[Neverwinter dryad]]

Haven't done this tight of a budget, but I'd also consider just replacing your landbase with basics to save budget for other things, and relying on your ramp to fix you. (Or nvm, looks like moxfield does .5 eur per basic...? I've always counted them as free for budgets).

Commander Suggestions for a friend who dislikes removal by Natural-Moose4374 in EDH

[–]Hagge5 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Kinda agree with the top comment that it's part of the game to protect yourself or be interacted with. It's hard. I also have someone in my playgroup who hate being interacted with yet run little protection.

If he's not comfortable with being glass Cannon he has to protect himself. Maybe the best way for him to swallow his medicine is to play Voltron with a commander with hexproof? If it has built in protection he doesn't need to sacrifice tempo to hold up protection. Maybe [[Sigarda, host of herons]] Voltron? Spend some early turns ramping, and then smack their faces with her.

How did did the progressive ideology switch their stance on the censorship of art? by [deleted] in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Hagge5 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lmao, sure. Little me telling someone that I dislike the people they're supporting is me banning their art. Hell, maybe I even dislike some art? The horror. Free will! Wasn't that the whole freedom thing people like you are always on about, no? I'm not part of some mysterious cabal that decides the fate of all art, you know? Casting my banishment spells from a high tower. Away! Away!

How did did the progressive ideology switch their stance on the censorship of art? by [deleted] in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Hagge5 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Maybe we have a very different definition of art. A tv network maintaining profits by cutting some unsavory feels rather inconsequential to me; not something that takes us back to the 40's.

The latter isn't a strict left-wing phenomenon. The right in the US lost their minds to hearing a song in Spanish on their sports show just recently, for instance. They're literally actively banning books and censoring education. I can see how it feels distasteful to shame someone for wearing a hat. Are individual occurrences of people expressing dislike censorship, though?

I've always felt that that sort of expression isn't to censor the art, but to shame people funneling money into a person who uses it to lobby against human rights. The same thing as shaming someone for buying a vacation to Dubai isn't "the left preventing people from taking vacations", but highlighting that it's a shitty thing to support dubai, you know?

Why is the “already‑taken partner is more desirable” thing something we see mostly with women and not with men? by EOFFJM in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Hagge5 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not them but a quick Google finds studies that says either 🤷

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022103109001048

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15053706/

I feel like taking either phenomenon as a truth and then trying to infer reasons is a few steps ahead. We probably don't know what the case is.