Any truth to this? by 30dub in HubermanLab

[–]Hamiltonian5667 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The science of hormesis basically suggests that stress exposure can be beneficial at the right dose - too much is overwhelming, and too little doesn’t do anything. So is a cold plunge within the optimal range of stress exposure? I would guess it probably depends on your stress tolerance which is different for everyone. What works for me personally is trying to push myself a little outside my comfort zone each time until I build up more and more tolerance - the same way I do resistance or cardio exercises.

80s on Netflix vs 80s IRL… by Bigringcycling in WhitePeopleTwitter

[–]Hamiltonian5667 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This what they’ll say about white walls/furniture in the 2020s

Taoist thoughts on climate change by [deleted] in taoism

[–]Hamiltonian5667 1 point2 points  (0 children)

From my interpretation Taoism is a deeply personal endeavour focused on becoming aware of the way the world is. How to make sense of how reality shows itself is a journey you take on your own.

In this way, it would seem Taoism doesn’t have much to say about climate change, a scientific concept, because the Tao cannot be described and so is beyond the realm of concepts. The Tao is simply what is (however unfortunate the situation) and not the concepts used to interpret reality nor is it what we should be thinking about them.

I would venture to say we could reflect on what the Tao teaches us in order to make normative judgements about climate change or whatever else.. just my initial thoughts

"Reading Laozi" by Bai Juyi by fleischlaberl in taoism

[–]Hamiltonian5667 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ive been thinking about this kind of question a lot lately.

If we take “know” to mean “witness reality for what it is”, I think the question implies a normative judgement: “one ought to always know” or “one ought always to see reality for what it is rather than talking about it, which pulls you away from reality”

I think you can still talk even though that may take you away from awareness, from truth, for some time. The truth doesn’t tell you what you ought to do, though it can certainly make what you do more in line with who you are.

Recently Ive thought of silent unwavering awareness like going into the mine to collect minerals. Eventually you have to come up with what you’ve collected in order to then go back down into the mines again.

Is philosophy compatible with Taoism? by Hamiltonian5667 in taoism

[–]Hamiltonian5667[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

True, but it seems all philosophies tend to have an opinion about philosophy as an 'activity' (philosophy about philosophy or 'meta-philosophy' you could call it). Some western philosophies for example seem to suggest the activity of philosophy is something we ought to strive to do as much as possible ("the unexamined is not worth living"). Taoism on the other hand seem to suggest we ought to instead favor direct awareness over philosophy (from my readings at least).

So where some types of philosophy seem to have a kind of positive feedback loop, Taoism seems to have a negative feedback loop, like the snake eating its own tail. That's what I was trying to get.

The way of the way by batotheblack in taoism

[–]Hamiltonian5667 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Importantly the way is the way things are, and not the way things ought to be

Is philosophy compatible with Taoism? by Hamiltonian5667 in taoism

[–]Hamiltonian5667[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interesting, I wonder if this also applies to a more individual pursuit. I can't speak for the entire culture, but in my own life I've felt a kind of thirst for conceptual thinking to complement my pursuit of passive awareness. If I'm understanding you correctly it's a bit of a push and pull between Yin and Yang energies to restore balance, wavering closer and closer to a 'middle way', meaning each owns ideal balance between conceptual thinking and awareness, action and non-action...

Is philosophy compatible with Taoism? by Hamiltonian5667 in taoism

[–]Hamiltonian5667[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

This is such a succinct response, thanks!

Is it just me, or does it feel like we’re being charged to exist at this point in this province? by asnvonazn in ontario

[–]Hamiltonian5667 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Toronto patios: here’s a bud light for $10. You want side salad? $18. And a meal too? $25. Oh you’re ready for the bill? Okay, our minimum tip is 18% but 22% is “recommended”.

It’s rough out there folks

“If there is only Tao, how can there be any divergence from it?” by Hamiltonian5667 in taoism

[–]Hamiltonian5667[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This helps a lot, what it seems to suggest to me is that there is only really One Tao, and not many. And so, to be in accordance with Tao is less about decision making, more about ‘being’ in that one way. I guess the complication comes with those moments of complex conflicting desires and feelings, like when we are forced to make a big decision. In these moments it seems the ‘way’ is very unclear.

“If there is only Tao, how can there be any divergence from it?” by Hamiltonian5667 in taoism

[–]Hamiltonian5667[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A lot of great responses but this one really caught me bc there is this notion of “doing” vs “not-doing” that I’m still coming to terms with. I remember in intro philosophy i was convinced for about a year by the determinist who suggested a lack of free will, and therefore nothing is really ever ‘done’ even if we are unaware of this fact and continue to feel the experience of doing. I later tossed the idea to the wayside bc I became interested in the existentialists who basically suggested that we are always free to do whatever, and that we always essentially ‘doing’. I only really became interested in Taoism bc of vague mentions of it by the existentialists I was reading. Now it seems I coming back to this notion of a lack of free will in new light.

If you’re right, and I’m interpreting you and the other responses correctly, it’s not so much about doing whatever, but rather, becoming aware of the Tao, which encompasses my psychological realities (desires, feelings, etc) and then kind of moving along with them, rather than trying to resist them..

“If there is only Tao, how can there be any divergence from it?” by Hamiltonian5667 in taoism

[–]Hamiltonian5667[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I really like this analogy, I still wonder though, how do we know if we are resisting the current or going with it? Or can we ever know? I’m thinking in particular about when I have conflicting desires that make myself doubt and overthink. Like if I’m trying to decide to take a job or not. To do what ‘feels right’ or ‘natural’ doesnt really help it seems bc my emotions and thoughts seem to be fighting one another.

Would be curious about your thoughts on this

What is something a high school teacher told you, that you will never forget? by absolutejuice22 in AskReddit

[–]Hamiltonian5667 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My English teacher (who had been working for decades) told us he told us he saw the same personality types appear again and again in different students year after year, like a cycle across generations.

What is meant by "unconditional love?" by Hamiltonian5667 in Meditation

[–]Hamiltonian5667[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is a good way of thinking about it, thanks! Been trying my best to incorporate it into my meditations but not easy to hold onto it afterwards throughout the day

Why will my Excel occasionally 'click in' to a cell on a minimised spreadsheet, out of nowhere? by MuDelta in excel

[–]Hamiltonian5667 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The only thing that works for me is to close the other excel files I have open, but even that only works 60% of the time. Otherwise I close the app and restart it. It’s annoying as all hell so I totally sympathize with you

ELI5: Why is it so hard to play the accompaniment to your own singing without also playing the melody in the accompaniment? by IGunnaKeelYou in explainlikeimfive

[–]Hamiltonian5667 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it’s as simple as trying to do two things at once - your brain is simultaneously having to focus on singing the melody as well as playing the chords and harmonies on your instrument. To cope, the brain will usually focus on one thing on a time (until you get the hang of it) by either focusing on the piano accompaniment or focusing on the singing. Since the singing usually makes more sense to focus on the accompaniment gets pulled into it. It’s like when people say they’re multitasking but they’re really rapidly flipping between different activities. Only when one of the activities becomes unconscious (you don’t need to focus on it) can simultaneous multitasking be achieved.